Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > What does it mean to "didn't sign-off" does it mean they refused to sign-off > or that they simply didn't tick a box? Does it mean they didn't even read > the report or that they didn't tick a box? It means the box is not tic

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache AsterixDB Incubator

Hi, if you read the proposal all the way to the end you will see that - while we do have some community and code - we don’t have mentors. So if you like the proposal, please volunteer. Cheers, Till > On Jan 14, 2015, at 6:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) > wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I am pleas

[PROPOSAL] Apache AsterixDB Incubator

Hi Folks, I am pleased to bring forth the Apache AsterixDB proposal to the Apache Incubator as Champion, working in collaboration with the team. Please find the wiki proposal here: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AsterixDBProposal Full text of the proposal is below. Please discuss and enjoy.

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/01/15 19:37, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >What would be more useful and more easily digested is a general top level >opaque metric, e.g. 55% of the mentors signed off on reports, and then for >each podling a similar metric. If naming names is imp

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating

The release vote passes with 3 +1 binding votes from Justin, Alan, and Chris and no -1 vote. We already addressed the comments about DISCLAIMER and NOTICE in our master branch for our next release. Thanks to everyone involved in making this release happen! On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Chris

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating

+1 Checksum and signature match, RAT OK, source tarball builds cleanly. LICENSE/NOTICE lgtm, and I agree with Marvin w.r.t. the missing DISCLAIMER (can be fixed in subsequent releases). -C On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > The Apache REEF PPMC has voted to release Apache R

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

> On Jan 14, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > With that said, I do agree that a board report is not the appropriate venue > for the Weegee paddy wagon parade. What would be more useful and more easily > digested is a general top level opaque metric, e.g. 55% of the mentors signed

RE: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

I don't agree with many of the assertions below. But I'll not easy those arguments My concern is this going into public record without an adequate explanation of what it means. You addressed that - thank you. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Alan D. Cabrera

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

> On Jan 14, 2015, at 10:56 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) > wrote: > > What does it mean to "didn't sign-off" does it mean they refused to sign-off > or that they simply didn't tick a box? Does it mean they didn't even read the > report or that they didn't tick a box? > > I've said it befo

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

Daniel, sorry about. I have updated the Wiki. Attaching the link to you email for reference to others: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ranger-dev/201501.mbox/ajax/%3C54A 920A7.5000501%40apache.org%3E Thanks for your help and guidance. Regards Bosco On 1/14/15, 8:48 AM, "Daniel Grun

RE: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

What does it mean to "didn't sign-off" does it mean they refused to sign-off or that they simply didn't tick a box? Does it mean they didn't even read the report or that they didn't tick a box? I've said it before, I see no value in having a "naughty list" like this. What I care about (with my

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

I did sign off on some of the projects I mentored: Aurora, and Kylin. I apologize for missing Ignite, and Zeppelin. - Henry On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > The following will be submitted to the board at midnight: > > The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

Tim’s changes seem to be victim of an edit conflict. In fact there are 3 edit conflicts in the report currently. On Jan 14, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Timothy Chen wrote: > Hi Roman, > > I just added my shepherd notes last night and I don't think it appeared. > > Not sure it's a big deal but if you c

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

Hi Roman, I just added my shepherd notes last night and I don't think it appeared. Not sure it's a big deal but if you can please pull the latest change. Thanks, Tim On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > The following will be submitted to the board at midnight: > > The Ap

RE: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

Please go ahead - apologies for not doing it myself I have access problems on the incubator wiki. Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -Original Message- From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:22 AM To: g

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

Anyone mind then if i put strawman up on the wiki? On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 12:11:42 PM Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > On Jan 14, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > at this point we have had a few lively threads > > discussing three somewhat different proposals: > > #1 m

RE: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

Thank you for volunteering to wikify my proposal - I appreciate it. Ross Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -Original Message- From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman Shaposhnik Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 8:

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

> On Jan 14, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Hi! > > at this point we have had a few lively threads > discussing three somewhat different proposals: > #1 mentor re-boot https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal

Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

Roman, Are all three available on the wiki? Maybe link to them just in case I missed one.. John On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:41 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > at this point we have had a few lively threads > discussing three somewhat different proposals: >#1 mentor re-boot >#2 pTL

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache REEF 0.10.0-incubating

Dear IPMC members, We have received 2 +1 binding votes so far. We'd really appreciate it if some of you can check the release and cast a vote for us to make progress. Please first check my response to Alan's email in case you have questions on the release. Thanks! - Gon On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 a

Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.)

Hi! at this point we have had a few lively threads discussing three somewhat different proposals: #1 mentor re-boot #2 pTLP #3 Ross's strawman http://s.apache.org/8eS it feels to me that all three need additional work to be done before we can have any reasonable consensus around them (let

Re: Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

*ahem*, I did sign off on both reports. However, my wiki access was fubared at the time, so I asked if anyone from the Ranger project could put a check mark next to my name. This has apparently not happened. I have also signed off on the Corinthia report. With regards, Daniel. On 2015-01-14 1

Final draft of IPMC report for January 2015

The following will be submitted to the board at midnight: The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts. There are currently 36 podlings undergoing incubation. One podling joined us this month (Corinthia). One me

Re: What is "The Apache Way"?

> > Please assign me this task. > This is a do-ocracy. Just do it :) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org