On 04/27/2015 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
* Acquia: Jake Farrell
Someone also correct me in that I don’t think Jake is a paid infra
contractor.
In addition the way I see
On 04/27/2015 10:17 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
+1, that's what I was trying to convey.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 7:05 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC
On Mon, Apr 27,
Not sure if your concern is diversity or scale, so I'll address both
separately. If your concern is something else please be more explicit.
Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the project
be run according to the Apache Way which includes being open to any
Apache CloudStack is receiving code for an EC2 interface to the CloudStack API.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-ec2stack.html
Please vote to approve this contribution.
Lazy consensus applies.
If no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
Thanks,
Apache CloudStack is receiving code for a Google GCE interface to the
CloudStack API.
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-gstack.html
Please vote to approve this contribution.
Lazy consensus applies.
If no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes.
Thanks,
I'd like to be on the initial list as well, so I've added myself.
On 24 April 2015 at 04:46, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Initial sketch placed on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhimsyProposal
Anyone who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly.
No
Apologies if this has been asked, but Rich's points got me
thinking. As it stands, I'm not sure I can see how Whimsy
can graduate without us squinting just so. Basically, I don't
see a clear way for the community to grow much beyond
the initial list of committers.
In a way, I'd rather see Whimsy
On 4/27/15 10:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
It's a tough one. We could be setting a precedence here that we absolutely
do not want to set. On the other hand, it's problematic (not to mention
simply
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Not sure if your concern is diversity or scale, so I'll address both
separately. If your concern is
something else please be more explicit.
Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I don't see how this is any different from any other project. The initial
contributors will work on it to
satisfy their needs. If organization X wants to use it they can contribute
code to
Sam, I don't *want* the role, but if you want one less task to do each month
I'd be happy to take on the chair role.
If someone actually *wants* the role then let them take it.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: sa3r...@gmail.com [mailto:sa3r...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Sam Ruby
Sent:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:47 PM Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net Anyone
who is so inclined is welcome to edit the proposal directly.
No urgency or timeframe in mind (other than preferably starting sometime
in 2015ish). My current thinking is to follow in Steve's footprints and
go directly to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
As for going straight to TLP I agree. Sam did say this was a possibility but
I believe he (rightly so) wants to ensure that the proposal is solid before
asking the board and IPMC to consider this
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...
In case you're curious -- I'd ask the same question, for example,
about a community
that decided to produce software that is be only applicable as an add-on
for a small market share commercial offering.
The
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
The other person is Dan Norris. Dan is a paid contractor, but talked
with me before
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
I’ll note that the only person I see from infra that has been proposed
in the current PMC is Jake Ferrel:
* Acquia: Jake Farrell
Someone also correct me in that I don’t think Jake is a paid infra
I've often wondered why we don't open source more of the infra code. Maybe this
is the reason.
Perhaps we need a new brand for such projects. Something like Apache Foo
(Infra). This would be similar to the (Incubator) branding. We could even
adopt some of the same policies (e.g. no press
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/), prior to being an
Apache project, provided a tinkerpop-neo4j adaptor with each release.
TinkerPop sees Neo4j as the reference OLTP implementation of
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
...Our mission is software for the public good. Whimsy is software for the
ASF's good. How does the public benefit from Whimsy?...
It makes us more efficient. As a board member, Whimsy helps me spend
less time on the boring
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the
project be run according to
the Apache Way which includes being open to any viewpoint brought to the
project, regardless
of the source.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It requires that the
project be run according to
the Apache Way which includes being
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 4/27/15 10:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
It's a tough one. We could be setting a precedence here that we absolutely
do
Hi Rich,
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 5:44 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Whimsy PMC
On 04/27/2015
Hello,
TinkerPop (http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/), prior to being an Apache
project, provided a tinkerpop-neo4j adaptor with each release. TinkerPop sees
Neo4j as the reference OLTP implementation of TinkerPop. With TinkerPop's
migration to the Apache Software Foundation, TinkerPop
24 matches
Mail list logo
