Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

+1. And I also volunteer to Mentor is another is desired or required. > On Oct 5, 2015, at 12:39 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > > Hi! > > We would like to start a discussion on accepting Mynewt, a RTOS (real-time > operating system) for Internet of Things devices, into

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

+1 It looks interesting, and open new "spaces". Regards JB On 10/05/2015 06:39 PM, Sterling Hughes wrote: Hi! We would like to start a discussion on accepting Mynewt, a RTOS (real-time operating system) for Internet of Things devices, into the Apache Incubator. Please take a look at the

Re: Concerted Proposal

If Incubator PMC sees fit, can I move this thread to a discuss thread to discuss accepting of Concerted into ASF Incubator? On 5 Oct 2015 14:24, wrote: > As a member of Concerted community, I believe that acceptance into ASF > Incubator is beneficial for Concerted

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating. I have a few questions for you: How many arches are you targeting initially? I saw ARM and MIPS commented below, but not sure if that's the initial list, or just a few notable. What's the CI/Build/Testing environment that you currently have? How many nodes,

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating. > I have a few questions for you: > > How many arches are you targeting initially? I saw ARM and MIPS > commented below, but not sure if that's the initial list, or just a > few notable. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > We would like to start a discussion on accepting Mynewt, a RTOS (real-time > operating system) for Internet of Things devices, into the Apache Incubator. I'm very excited about this potential podling! The Internet of

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

Yes, I also think johnzon is really ready to graduate. Project is really doing fine imo. And another yes, it was the intention to give other IPMC members a chance to review the the release and cast their -1 if they find something wrong. The project has quite a few PPMC members which are also

Re: Concerted Proposal

Always! On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Atri Sharma wrote: > If Incubator PMC sees fit, can I move this thread to a discuss thread to > discuss accepting of Concerted into ASF Incubator? > On 5 Oct 2015 14:24, wrote: > > > As a member of Concerted

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1. > > And I also volunteer to Mentor is another is desired or required. Excellent -- it's great to have a fourth Mentor! I'll add you to the proposal. Marvin Humphrey

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

2015-10-05 22:09 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Yes, I also think johnzon is really ready to graduate. Project is really > doing fine imo. > > And another yes, it was the intention to give other IPMC members a chance > to review the the release and cast their -1 if they find

Re: Concerted Proposal

It looks like there is plenty of mentor-power left on the project. I don't see why one mentor dropping out from a good and large group is a problem. On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > as some of you know, Atri and I have been > discussing his

Re: Concerted Proposal

Well, I think what we should ask ourselves is if this is actually the role of ASF incubation. FMPOV the project will evolve much easier at github, and once the code base becomes a reality we can help mentoring the project in the Apache way. But this is just my personal opinion. On Mon, Oct 5,

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Unomi into the Apache Incubator

Hi all, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Bertrand Delacretaz, Seetharam Venkatesh, Chris Mattmann, John D. Ament, Roman Shaposhnik, Hadrian Zbarcea, Henry Saputra +1 (non-binding): Serge Huber, Raul Kripalani 0: none -1: none Thanks everyone

Re: Concerted Proposal

As a member of Concerted community, I believe that acceptance into ASF Incubator is beneficial for Concerted especially in terms of community support. Being an independent project on github really does not help when we want to build a healthy community of people interested in Concerted and

Re: Concerted Proposal

The Board created the Incubator as a mechanism to bring projects into the ASF. Whether that could be construed as "provide a space for a project to bootstrap itself, into a new ASF project" is arguable. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > Well, I think

Re: Concerted Proposal

While I do not disagree with the fact that the code base can evolve at github, the situation here is a bit different. Preliminary though it is, Concerted does have an existing code base. The bigger question is having the code base evolve at a higher frequency with a wider community. I think that

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Unomi into the Apache Incubator

Thanks a lot JB for helping me through this process. It's still a little new to me :) cheers, Serge... - -- --- -=[ shuber at jahia dot com ]= --- -- - CTO & Co-founder - Jahia Solutions Group, 9 Routes de Jeunes, 1227 Acacias, Switzerland twitter: @sergehuber

[ANNOUNCE] Josh Elser joins the Incubator PMC

Greets, Apache Member Josh Elser has joined the IPMC, where he'll be helping out the Rya podling as a Mentor. Josh is a member of the Accumulo PMC and a committer on Slider. Welcome, Josh! Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe,

[ANNOUNCE] Sterling Hughes joins the Incubator PMC

Greets, Sterling Hughes, an emeritus Apache Member, has joined the Incubator PMC. He is a core contributor for the Mynewt OS and is proposed as a Mentor for that pending podling. Sterling was active at the ASF during the early days of HTTPD and PHP. Sterling, if you have any reminiscences about

Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

Hi incubator, Mark forwarded the vote at the beginning of dev@ vote. Therefore it sounds to me we don't need to vote again on these binaries. Can you confirm it please? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

@Marvin: right for source/binary, sorry for this miswording Think we should graduate soon yes, just one of us needs to take time to do it. Then I consider the vote done and will finish the release Thanks guys! 2015-10-05 7:29 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament : > I don't believe

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

I don't believe that to be the case. You guys are mature enough, why not graduate? On Oct 5, 2015 10:06 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote: > Hi incubator, > > Mark forwarded the vote at the beginning of dev@ vote. Therefore it sounds > to me we don't need to vote again on

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Mark forwarded the vote at the beginning of dev@ vote. Therefore it sounds > to me we don't need to vote again on these binaries. Apache votes are on the source releases, not binaries. > Can you confirm it >

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

understood it hasnt been clear enough in Mark's mail but still matches the incubator policy. If not we can do the same vote with the same votes, not a big deal. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'm not sure that matches what we are saying. It matches what I was saying -- I think the thread was (barely, arguably) within the letter of Incubator policy and thus it's not necessary to run another vote. But it

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

I'm not sure that matches what we are saying. On Oct 5, 2015 10:34, "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote: > @Marvin: right for source/binary, sorry for this miswording > > Think we should graduate soon yes, just one of us needs to take time to do > it. > > Then I consider the vote

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

I'm fine either way. Could the podling forward their result at least with the IPMC binding votes listed? On Oct 5, 2015 11:58, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > I'm not sure that matches what we

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

the +1 bindings listed in the result were the ipmc votes, ie: - Mark - Justin - Daniel - and me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Incubator PMC/Board report for Oct 2015 ([ppmc])

Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 October 2015, 10:30 am PST. The report for your podling

[DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

Hi! We would like to start a discussion on accepting Mynewt, a RTOS (real-time operating system) for Internet of Things devices, into the Apache Incubator. Please take a look at the proposal and let us know any comments or feedback you have. We think this project could be a pretty exciting way