RE: When podlings don't file a report

Your reply is fine, except that your original question was about what happens when “If it turns out that the Mentors have been reminding the podling to file but nobody's followed through” In other words mentors have already said “I’m on it” and have already tried to fix the problem. Your reply

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?.. 4 weeks is to get the board to vote on the resolution - our meeting was yesterday and the next one is on November 18. As Hadrian says, It is unfortunate that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Jason, You need to update the LICENSE file for Kylin to include the one for AdminLTE. I will reopen the JIRA to reflect this. - Henry On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> But this should not a block issue for release. > > My +0 doesn’t block

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Luke Han wrote: > Just got SGA confirmation from ASF as below... Confirmed, +1 for graduation then. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Thanks Henry, I'm also happy to help Eagle for incubating, the experience we have learnt during Kylin's incubating will share to Eagle team and community. Sign off reports and vote for release is not only things mentors will help, for the process, setup, policy, infrastructure, guidance,

Re: Short form IP clearance

First and foremost, I have not followed this thread almost at all. I've been at ATO2015 and then traveling. What I will say, whether it has been said or not, that as VP Legal, I will work w/ the Incubator on whatever issues or questions they may have. If it's time for a conversation between VP

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Arun - This is a very interesting proposal and I can imagine at least a couple ways that it and Apache Knox could work together. I would like to be a contributor to Eagle as well - if you are interested. I am a committer and PMC member on Knox and Ranger and have contributed to a number of

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Thanks Larry. We have some ideas for integration with Ranger and would love to get your inputs. On 10/22/15, 4:55 AM, "larry mccay" wrote: >Arun - > >This is a very interesting proposal and I can imagine at least a couple >ways that it and Apache Knox could work together. >I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi, > But this should not a block issue for release. My +0 doesn’t block the release, you only need 3 +1 votes. Normally I would of asked to fix in next release and probably voted +1 as it’s likely they are Apache comparable licences, but this issue has occurred before and there's a vote on

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the board meeting. Now I get it. On Oct 21, 2015 23:09, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > I think that's my point. Those

Re: Not just yet

For the curious and conspiracy theorists :) let me complete the picture. I did actually attend the board meeting as I usually do and the board was gracious enough to give me a couple of minutes to correct the resolution. Unfortunately, whimsy wouldn't save the corrected resolution, for a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

HI, > You need to update the LICENSE file for Kylin to include the one for AdminLTE. The files in question are not part of AdminLTE [1] that I can see. Even if they were they would have different copyright owners and a different LICENCE to AdminLTE. An educated guess is that they are the

[IP Clearance] Alibaba JStorm

Apache Storm has received a code donation for Alibaba JStorm: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/storm-jstorm.html The source code can be found at https://github.com/alibaba/jstorm with the following git commit SHA: e935da91a897797dad56e24c4ffa57860ac91878 Please vote to approve this

Re: Short form IP clearance

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > First and foremost, I have not followed this thread almost at > all. I've been at ATO2015 and then traveling. > > What I will say, whether it has been said or not, that > as VP Legal, I will work w/ the Incubator on

Re: Short form IP clearance

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> First and foremost, I have not followed this thread almost at >> all. I've been at ATO2015 and then traveling. >> >> What I will say, whether it has

Re: Short form IP clearance

Again my apologies for polluting this thread with tangential thoughts. Maybe I should start a new thread: "Is IP Clearance Optional?" My point is that some projects seem to be diligent, while others do not -- to the point that at times the IP Clearance process seems optional. I would expect

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Looks like the discussion has calm down, so unless there is more comments we will send VOTE thread tomorrow. Thanks all for the feedback. - Henry On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > My name is Arun Manoharan. Currently a product

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

Looks like the discussion has calm down, so unless there is more comments we will send VOTE thread tomorrow. Thanks all for the feedback. - Henry On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Manoharan, Arun wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > My name is Arun Manoharan. Currently a product

Re: [DISCUSS] Eagle incubator proposal

+1 for moving forward with a VOTE. > On Oct 22, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > > Looks like the discussion has calm down, so unless there is more > comments we will send VOTE thread tomorrow. > > Thanks all for the feedback. > > - Henry > >> On Mon, Oct 19,

Re: When podlings don't file a report

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Your reply is fine, except that your original question was about what > happens when “If it turns out that the Mentors have been reminding the > podling to file but nobody's followed through” > > In other words

Re: Not just yet (was: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Brooklyn from incubator)

Indeed, if Hadrian had succeeded in editing during the meeting, it would have been fixed right then. Murphy weighed in and we have a 4 week delay. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened

Re: [IP Clearance] Alibaba JStorm

Finally JStorm is coming:) There are many discussion between my friends and local community in China about JStorm/Storm, people are really would like to have them together. I think this is great milestone to have more contribution from big giant from China market (even the biggest in the world;-)

Re: Short form IP clearance

It certainly is not optional, and it would be very unfortunate if TLPs thought so or are unaware. One of the reasons I'd prefer Legal to be the clear owner. (But to be clear, that is separate from my original post) On Oct 22, 2015 6:13 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: > Again my

Re: Not just yet

Indeed, the month delay in consideration is exactly an opportunity to correct the resolutions technical defects. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Hi John, > > I was a reply to your message, but it was not pointed at you. Seriously. > Maybe the

Re: [IP Clearance] Alibaba JStorm

+1 (non-binding) Amol On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:13 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Apache Storm has received a code donation for Alibaba JStorm: > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/storm-jstorm.html > > The source code can be found at

[ANNOUNCE] Apache AsterixDB 0.8.7-incubating released

The Apache AsterixDB (incubating) Team is happy to announce the first release of Apache AsterixDB 0.8.7-incubating and its associated Hyracks release. Apache AsterixDB is a Big Data Management System (BDMS) that can store, index, manage, and query semi-structured data at scale on a cluster.

Re: Not just yet

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > For the curious and conspiracy theorists :) let me complete the picture. > > I did actually attend the board meeting as I usually do and the board was > gracious enough to give me a couple of minutes to correct the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Thanks Justin, Will raise another thread to continue discuss this. Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate? Thanks. 发自我的 iPhone > 在 2015年10月23日，12:56，Justin Mclean 写道： > > Hi, > >> So my question is: Which license should to be declare in downstream

RE: When podlings don't file a report

+1 Sent from my Windows Phone From: Ted Dunning Sent: ‎10/‎22/‎2015 6:10 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Marvin Humphrey Subject: Re: When podlings don't file

Re: Not just yet

On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote: >... > I've also opened another issue that I would appreciate feedback on: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-28 Cross-check is nice. I'd suggest another possibility: a web tool to *add* a template-based resolution

[Result][VOTE] Graduate Apache Kylin from the Apache Incubator

The vote for Apache Kylin to become a top-level project has passed with 27 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Thank you everyone for taking the time to review and cast your vote. We will now prepare a resolution for the next Board meeting. 10 binding: * Henry Saputra * Andrew Purtell * Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi, > So my question is: Which license should to be declare in downstream of > Google Fonts? INAL you may want to ask for clarification on legal discuss. I would go with what is in the metadata of the font file as it usually contains the copyright holder and the licensing information, but I’d

Re: Not just yet

Agreed, it would likely make more sense for the entire doc to be a template, with only a few variables and maybe a single check indicating they want bylaws or not. On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM Greg Stein wrote: > On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi Justin, JIRA has been reopened and added information about license. Also added Google Fonts and Source Sans Pro license information in Apache Kylin's LICENSE file. It looks like Google Fonts included Source Sans Pro, and has it's own license agreement, suppose Google

Re: Not just yet

Hi Hadrian, All, We have acquired a lot of familiarity with the challenges of the due processes and also their importance. We in the Brooklyn community understand completely and we really appreciate all the assistance we are getting. I suggest we still look to release an 0.9.0 around the

Re: Short form IP clearance

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > First and foremost, I have not followed this thread almost at > all. I've been at ATO2015 and then traveling. > > What I will say, whether it has been said or not, that > as VP Legal, I will work w/ the Incubator on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Kylin 1.1-incubating (rc1)

Hi, > Would you mind to change your vote to release this candidate? You can release it without me changing my vote, there are no veto on releases. But as you asked and it's been dealt with my vote is +1 (binding). Thanks, Justin

Re: Not just yet

On Oct 22, 2015 8:05 AM, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote: > > For the curious and conspiracy theorists :) let me complete the picture. > > I did actually attend the board meeting as I usually do and the board was gracious enough to give me a couple of minutes to correct the

Re: Not just yet

Hi John, I was a reply to your message, but it was not pointed at you. Seriously. Maybe the "curious" part a bit, because you asked. We know however from experience that there are many other people who are curious what happens when unusual events like this take place and even a few, as I