Le 05/11/15 13:48, Joe Brockmeier a écrit :
> On 11/05/2015 03:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>> PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase,
>>> which is why I cringe every time I see people talking about what "the bar"
>>> should be. It's about trust. If you trust so
Hi,
+1 (binding) but only if you raise a JIRA and fix up LICENSE and NOTICE issues
for the next release.
Everything here is permissive so it's more a documentation issue than an
licensing error.
For the next release could you mind mentioning the git/svn hash that the
released code correspond
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> ...that brought us to our current, much less forceful, treatment
> of the maturity model. Which is what I (and a few others including
> it seems yourself) have been advocating on *this* thread.
I took the tenor of the conversation as headi
On 5 November 2015 at 17:02, Ali Lown wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> I have moved the nightly builds section to its own page only
> accessible under the releases section on the getting involved page.
> (It might be slightly too hidden for people to find it now).
The new page looks good, thanks.
> I have cor
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> IIRC you Roman were on the list of "undersigned" ;-).
Yup. And that's why I felt like clarifying.
> It got shot down for many, many reasons.
Well, that depends on what 'it' is. But that's a different conversation ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
---
IIRC you Roman were on the list of "undersigned" ;-).
It got shot down for many, many reasons.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > I don't think anybody is pining to make compliance with Bertrand's very
> nice
> > doc
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I don't think anybody is pining to make compliance with Bertrand's very nice
> document into a policy document.
To be fair, one offshoot of the 'undersigned' epic had that implication.
It got shot down with 'trust the mentors' argument. And..
I don't think anybody is pining to make compliance with Bertrand's very nice
document into a policy document. Rather, some people are finding it a
useful
guide to gauging project maturity, which is great and should be encouraged.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:35 PM, larry mccay wrote:
> Hi Caleb -
Hi guys,
Thanks for the info. My primary goal in proposing this project for incubation
is to build a developer community. If Apache Labs is a better place to start,
that's fine - I'll look into that.
FYI, the current source code for the project is here:
https://github.com/gk-brown/WebRPC
If
Hi Caleb -
I am glad that it is useful for your projects.
I think that the use of it that you describe is valuable.
It should be used as guidance and interpreted by the mentors for each
podling.
"These sort of metrics can be used to indicate health in this way or that"
- this is different from "
I am not in favor of bureaucracy, However...
Having reviewed the maturity model and speaking as a member of a newly
incubating podling I would like to chime in to say that I find it very
useful. It helps frame discussions around what we can be doing as a
community to embrace the apache way, move
+1 - I am concerned by the trend that I see developing here.
A set of interview questions for evaluation is one thing but criteria
checkboxes that will encourage behaviors by rote will not actually develop
more healthy communities just communities that can get the boxes checked.
While certain met
+1 Agree entirely. -C
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> Correct. It is a tool, but not a requirement (at least not yet).
>> And since I repeatedly suggested this tool on this thread let me explain why.
>
> An
Sebb,
I have moved the nightly builds section to its own page only
accessible under the releases section on the getting involved page.
(It might be slightly too hidden for people to find it now).
I have corrected that typo, thanks.
Ali
On 4 November 2015 at 01:02, sebb wrote:
> On 3 November 2
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Greg Brown wrote:
> ...As an ASF member myself, can I act as my own champion, or
> does another member need to act as champion on my behalf?...
I don't see a problem with you being the champion, but as Christian
says you'll need to have a few committers to enter in
Hi Greg,
from my experience it has proven to be very hard to start
single-man-shows here. The Incubator works best if there is an active
community already.
If you are a sole person, you might also consider labs.apache.org. Some
people say, Labs is for experiments, and when there is a community, g
Hi all,
I've been out of the Apache loop for a while, but I have a new project I'd like
to propose for incubation. I know new Incubator projects require a champion. As
an ASF member myself, can I act as my own champion, or does another member need
to act as champion on my behalf?
It certainly
On 11/04/2015 03:55 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> One question on discussing candidature of a person for PPMC on private:
> I know that private is only for PPMC, but I believe the new elected PPMC
> can always get the digest for older messages (or not?). If that is the case
> wouldn't it defeat
On 11/05/2015 03:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase,
>> which is why I cringe every time I see people talking about what "the bar"
>> should be. It's about trust. If you trust someone to work the gears on a
>> release,
>> that
On 11/05/2015 01:34 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Thanks Lenni. If Joe will permit me to put some words in his mouth,
> he seems to be focused on how the project is solving coordination problems.
> Coming to agreement on things like what to include in a release for
> instance, which jiras get punted t
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Correct. It is a tool, but not a requirement (at least not yet).
> And since I repeatedly suggested this tool on this thread let me explain why.
And, this is the root of my concern expressed in the other general@
thread: I fear that this
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, aditi hilbert wrote:
I would like to be granted write access to the Apache Wiki for the
Apache Incubator. I shall be posting the status report content on behalf
of the new Mynewt project.
My username is ‘aditihilbert'
Karma granted, good luck with the report!
Nick
-
> PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase,
> which is why I cringe every time I see people talking about what "the bar"
> should be. It's about trust. If you trust someone to work the gears on a
> release,
> that has considerable impact on the well-being of a proj
23 matches
Mail list logo
