Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.6-incubating (RC2)

Silly me - send this email too early. I see the vote is closed already. Sorry for the noise. Cos On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:43AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Thanks Alex! > > BTW, the vote has been open for the whole week now, and it seems that you have > enough binding votes to make it happen.

Re: Incubator wiki

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Felix Cheung wrote: > FelixCheung > > Permission to edit please Done. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zeppelin (incubating) 0.5.6-incubating (RC2)

Thanks Alex! BTW, the vote has been open for the whole week now, and it seems that you have enough binding votes to make it happen. Perhaps, this is time to close and publish the release? There are people waiting for it, you know ;) Cos On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:34PM, Alexander Bezzubov wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Friday, January 22, 2016, 9:13:15 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > There are unexpected jars in source release but this will be fixed in a later > release. [1] > > I checked: > - incubating in release name > - disclaimer exists > - license and notice correct > - unexpected

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the meantime inside Google, FlumeJava evolved into Dataflow. So all three share a number of concepts like PCollections, ParDo, DoFn, etc. However, Dataflow adds a number of new things -- the biggest being a unified

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Thanks Frances ! That explains it. Wrote a couple of posts on basic usage of Crunch, may be its time to rewrite them with Dataflow. On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Frances Perry wrote: > Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Crunch has Spark pipelines, but not sure about the runner abstraction. May be Josh Wills or Tom White can provide more insight on this topic. They are core devs for both projects :) On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know deeply

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Friday, January 22, 2016, 6:29:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Maybe it's too late or has been already reported but at 1st glance > it was not obvious to me that, after downloading/installing Ant and Ivy, I > should > have copied ivy.jar in ant/lib to be able to build. > > Else you get this

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

It makes perfect sense, and it's something that we already discussed. Thanks James and Marvin. @James, yes, we are going to deal with that together, not a problem at all. I agree that renaming should happen now. As discussed, we should be back with a new name early next week. I'm happy to

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Tsuyoshi Awesome: I added you on the proposal. Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/22/2016 04:29 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: Hi, I'm a core developer of Apache Hadoop and a contributor of Apache Tez. I'd be also interested in working on Apache Dataflow as an individual. Regards, - Tsuyoshi

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Mayank, sure: you are in. Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/22/2016 12:29 AM, Mayank Bansal wrote: Hi Jean, Nice Proposal. I wanted to contribute to this project. Can you please add me too? Thanks a lot for the help Thanks, Mayank On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Supun, I added you on the proposal. Thanks ! Regards JB On 01/22/2016 12:37 AM, Supun Kamburugamuve wrote: We are developing parallel machine learning algorithms for a research project and are very interested in DataFlow. I would like to contribute to this project as well. It will be great

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Once I had time to check this new attempt, I vote +1 (binding) to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01. On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > I'd also suggest that you name each release candidate in order e.g rc1, > rc2, rc3 etc etc rather than

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Hi, > Now there is (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-15). Thanks for that. > I have red the related ASF documents back then, and I don't understand > how can this lead to any legal problem since: > - These binaries were contributed directly to the project > - Their origin is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Hi, +1 binding There are unexpected jars in source release but this will be fixed in a later release. [1] I checked: - incubating in release name - disclaimer exists - license and notice correct - unexpected binary files in source release (jars) - all source files have Apache headers - can

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

On 1/22/16, 10:58 AM, "Frances Perry" wrote: >Crunch started as a clone of FlumeJava, which was Google internal. In the >meantime inside Google, FlumeJava evolved into Dataflow. So all three >share >a number of concepts like PCollections, ParDo, DoFn, etc. However,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

On 1/21/16, 11:52 PM, "Daniel Dekany" wrote: >Friday, January 22, 2016, 1:08:36 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> If may be (but unlikely IMO) that this applies [1]. Best to ask on >> legal discuss to confirm. > >I have red the related ASF documents back then, and I don't

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Hi, > Justin, Podling has decided to keep their old method having RCs out for a > while for integration testing. It’s only a suggestion. It’s totally up to the PMC how they name their release candidates. > That's was the source I vote -1,because FMPOV that was not properly handled > in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi Seshu, I blogged about Apache Dataflow proposal: http://blog.nanthrax.net/2016/01/introducing-apache-dataflow/ You can see in the "what's next ?" section that new runners, skins and sources are on our roadmap. Definitely, a storm runner could be part of this. Regards JB On 01/22/2016

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi JB, Curious to know about how it compares to Apache Crunch? Constructs looks very familiar (had used Crunch long ago) Thoughts? - Ashish On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Seshu, > > I blogged about Apache Dataflow proposal: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Awesome to see CloudDataFlow coming to Apache. The Stream Processing area has been in general fragmented with a variety of solutions, hoping the community galvanizes around Apache Data Flow. We are still in the "Apache Storm" world, Any chance for folks building a "Storm Runner²? On 1/20/16,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

+1 (binding) quickly checked legal files (disclainer, license and notice) and build from source without problem. Regards JB On 01/20/2016 08:26 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote: Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

As a committer of another "dataflow" incubator Taverna, I think this looks like an exciting proposal. Agree on the confusion of the name, and it's probably better to get that sorted early. In Taverna we have used the term "dataflow" since 2004, and as a concept the paradigm was created in the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-rc01 (incubating)

Maybe it's too late or has been already reported but at 1st glance it was not obvious to me that, after downloading/installing Ant and Ivy, I should have copied ivy.jar in ant/lib to be able to build. Else you get this error: <

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Dataflow Incubator Proposal

Hi, I don't know deeply Crunch, but AFAIK, Crunch creates MapReduce pipeline, it doesn't provide runner abstraction. It's based on FlumeJava. The logic is very similar (with DoFns, pipelines, ...). Correct me if I'm wrong, but Crunch started after Google Dataflow, especially because

Incubator wiki

FelixCheung Permission to edit please