Re: Throwing my hat in the ring

2016-05-14 Thread Mike Jumper
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:18 PM, wrote: > > ... > > AIUI, I'm able to be an informal mentor for any podlings of interest (hey, > there Guacamole!) so I'll just kinda poke around with that for a while, but > I'll also keep an eye out here for other stuff that comes up. > "Hey, Daniel!" - Guacamol

Re: Throwing my hat in the ring

2016-05-14 Thread Shane Curcuru
drugg...@primary.net wrote on 5/14/16 8:18 PM: > Hi, all; > I've been having a lot of great F2F talks the past few days at the con > and Marvin has talked me into throwing my hat in the ring to help with > the incubator project. So, yeah - I'm game to help where I can (and by > sending this email,

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

2016-05-14 Thread Simon Chan
Thanks Roman. 1. Apache Beam looks promising. I agree it can potentially be extremely useful in, for example, Data Preparator of DASE-architecture engine of PredictionIO so it can leverage Spark/Flink/Google Dataflow. Look forward to hearing more about it. 2. The integration with Apache Zeppelin

Throwing my hat in the ring

2016-05-14 Thread druggeri
Hi, all; I've been having a lot of great F2F talks the past few days at the con and Marvin has talked me into throwing my hat in the ring to help with the incubator project. So, yeah - I'm game to help where I can (and by sending this email, it kinda forces me to follow through). AIUI, I'm ab

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

2016-05-14 Thread Andrew Purtell
Yikes, apologies for the formatting. It looked fine in Gmail when I sent it alas. I must let the proposers respond to the technical questions but I think I can make the general observation that would-be contributors proposing and performing work on new and better Apache ecosystem integrations

Re: [DISCUSS] PredictionIO incubation proposal

2016-05-14 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Super excited to see this proposal! This will finally allow us to have an ASF managed backend for next generation data-driven apps that I see emerging quite rapidly. The proposal looks great to me (although I'd recommend calling Scala as an implementation language more prominently since it may att

Re: Additional mentor steps?

2016-05-14 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 4:38 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:29 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> > My reaction (being ignorant of the machinery behind phonebook and >> authorization) >> > is that adding to asf-authoriza

Re: Additional mentor steps?

2016-05-14 Thread John D. Ament
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 6:29 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > My reaction (being ignorant of the machinery behind phonebook and > authorization) > > is that adding to asf-authorization-template on podling creation would > be ok (since it > > is

Re: Additional mentor steps?

2016-05-14 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > My reaction (being ignorant of the machinery behind phonebook and > authorization) > is that adding to asf-authorization-template on podling creation would be ok > (since it > is done only once per podling, by a mentor who presumably knows wh

Re: Additional mentor steps?

2016-05-14 Thread Julian Hyde
My reaction (being ignorant of the machinery behind phonebook and authorization) is that adding to asf-authorization-template on podling creation would be ok (since it is done only once per podling, by a mentor who presumably knows what they are doing) but adding to asf-authorization-template ea

Re: Additional mentor steps?

2016-05-14 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
To answer back into the original thread (based on the question about Phonebook last week): On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:51 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Due to some changes in recent times around the ASF, I think I've identified > a new setup step for podlings. > > I'd like to recommend adding

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-14 Thread Suneel Marthi
+1 Sent from my iPhone > On May 14, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, James Taylor > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-14 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, James Taylor wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi > > wrote: > > > Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on > accepting > > > Fluo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-14 Thread James Taylor
+1 (binding) On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi > wrote: > > Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > > Fluo into the Apache Incubator. > > > > Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/F

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-14 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > Since discussion has died down, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > Fluo into the Apache Incubator. > > Proposal: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FluoProposal > > [ ] +1 Accept Fluo into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ]