Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:30 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik > > wrote: > > > >> First of all, the way apache org is

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread John D. Ament
Jake, I"m definitely interested in hearing more. I've been off and on trying to get ActiveMQ Artemis builds up on docker. I haven't gotten quite enough of an answer from infra, and don't know enough myself to get it working right. I suspect, from my own artifactory experience, the bintray

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > We have our own docker registry available for projects to use, its hosted > out of bintray. Access can be granted per project via an infra ticket > request. > > Dockerhub is used in an automated builds capacity, we can

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pirk 0.1.0-incubating Release

2016-08-29 Thread Ellison Anne Williams
Hi, It has been 72 hours and the IMPC vote for Apache Pirk 0.1.0-release has passed with four +1 (binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes. The Apache Pirk (incubating) community will proceed with the release. Thanks! Ellison Anne On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Tim Ellison

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread Jake Farrell
We have our own docker registry available for projects to use, its hosted out of bintray. Access can be granted per project via an infra ticket request. Dockerhub is used in an automated builds capacity, we can set it to only build tagged versions. Happy to answer any questions about either

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > FWIW, I say that we should just adopt a repository.apache.org approach > and declare that nightly/snapshot Docker images can only be distributed > from our own Docker repo. That way there's absolutely 0 chance

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread Mike Jumper
On Aug 29, 2016 8:30 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > ... > >> Note that there was a separate discussion focused on where is the right > >> place for nightly/snapshot Docker builds to be deposited to. > >> > >> Sadly, that discussion bore no fruit :-( > >> > > > > Was

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
See my reply to John if you're curious to know my take on both questions. Thanks, Roman. On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > On Aug 28, 2016 5:58 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: >> >> First of all, the way apache org is setup on

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > >> First of all, the way apache org is setup on GitHub make me 99% sure >> that the only artifacts allowed there would be release ones.

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

2016-08-29 Thread Edward Capriolo
Sorry for a lazy question. Can you point me at the proces you have ant/maven/shell/jenkins/whatever that builds the dockers. I would be interested in seeing if I can apply that elsewhere. On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > Hello all, > > We, Apache