Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

So on one hand the initial commiters list is not something so important and we should realy just be careful about the PPMC then vote more commiters during incubation. On the other hand the initial commiters list is super important. Is there some actual incubation documentation clearing this up?

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Greg, many people on this list are probably unaware that your role changed a couple of days ago... On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@apache.org > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > >...there hasn't even been a vote on the proposal at this stage. :-) > > Correct ;-) > > FWIW I've seen an

Re: [discuss] Move podling rosters to LDAP

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:17 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > cc += gstein > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes > wrote: > > Did this conclude..? Just in case it didn't, here's my +1 as well to > > make podling membership be in proper LDAP

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Hi, I actually have a question regarding the plugins. Maybe I missed it in the discussion so far, but what will happen with all of those? I mean some are part of the binary download by default. Will they all move to apache license and then be hosted at apache if possible too, or will this

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:30 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I spoke with Geertjan this afternoon. We both happened to be at the same > popular java conference in San Francisco. I did give him some advice on > the current initial contributors list. Basically two notes: > > -

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Wade Chandler > wrote: >> ...I recently contributed some things for Groovy support, and intend to work >> quite a bit on those features... >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Wade, > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Wade Chandler > wrote: >> ..I can say as a long time contributor who is not on the initial list, I >> understand, think it is fine, and

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Still, the question remain -- for somebody like that, what would be a >> criteria >> to be added as a committer after the project enters incubation? > > > Let's stop wasting

Re: [discuss] Move podling rosters to LDAP

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Does means podlings will also need to define both a $podling and > $podling-pmc group? It doesn't require that... it doesn't preclude that. My original proposal was not to add that separation, but such could be

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

The vote passes, with 7 +1 votes (4 binding) and no -1 votes. +1 Jarek Jarcec Cecho (binding) +1 Gangumalla, Uma +1 Todd Lipcon (binding) +1 Tom White (binding) +1 Zheng, Kai +1 Stack (binding) +1 Debo Dutta Thanks all for voting. Spot has been accepted for Incubation at Apache. Welcome Spot!

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

Great news. You Apache Streams had a going out of business sale that went so well their back in business ! On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:08 PM, apache wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On September 23, 2016 at 12:51:30 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org) > wrote: > >

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

+1 (non-binding) On September 23, 2016 at 12:51:30 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org) wrote:

Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Le 23/09/16 à 15:30, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit : > OK. Before the vote, will work on making the initial contributors list as > complete as possible. > > What is the process for doing that? Do I simply make changes directly in > the proposal? Do I make the changes public here before adding them to

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

In light of the positive feedback and input from Benjamin Young from W3C and Suneel Marthi which hopefully will lead to a renewal of activity and a move forwards for Apache Streams, I'm hereby cancelling this vote for retirement. I'm looking forward to the next steps! Kind regards, Ate On

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

Hi Benjamin, Thanks for chiming in, and not a bit too late :-) I think it would be great if the ActivityStreams 2.0 group and Apache Streams can work together and with the help of the W3C group might help 'reset' the project and move forwards again. I am really happy to cancel the vote for

RE: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

I am currently sitting in the W3C’s Social Web Working Group’s face-to-face meeting and have just finished discussing features of ActivityStreams 2.0: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ The Social Web WG is nearing the end of it’s charter, and preparing to ship the AS2.0 spec—which

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

On September 22, 2016 at 5:05:39 PM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu) wrote: On 2016-09-21 18:28, apache wrote: > I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social > web > data interoperability. Participating in the incubator process has taught me a > > lot, and I would

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

OK. Before the vote, will work on making the initial contributors list as complete as possible. What is the process for doing that? Do I simply make changes directly in the proposal? Do I make the changes public here before adding them to the proposal? Do I work directly with the mentors via

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.4.0 (incubating) RC1

My vote: 0 (non-binding) +1 tag/commit +1 git vs source zip +1 No binaries 0 mvn install fails in test 0 Apache rat is not happy 0 dist includes a _remote.repositories file - this should be removed +1 LICENSE DISCLAIMER NOTICE I'm afraid it's not a positive vote from me because the build fails

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Hi Bertrand, Responses in line. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Geertjan, > > I won't have time to look at your whole message now, just a few > clarifications as far as committers/PMC is concerned. > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:50 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

GJ, regarding this, I request you ta add me to the initial committers. -- Herzliche Grüße, Best regards Michael Müller Twitter: @muellermi Blog: blog.mueller-bruehl.de Web Development with Java and JSF: leanpub.com/jsf Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams: leanpub.com/lambdas Am 23. September

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Hi Geertjan, I won't have time to look at your whole message now, just a few clarifications as far as committers/PMC is concerned. On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > ...Anyone on the list > will, once the proposal has been voted on and