[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Streams version 0.3-incubating

Hello, The IPMC vote passes. The IPMC vote thread is here: http://markmail.org/thread/skg4ttfwjhbq6wc5 Summary: 4 (binding) [+4] 0 [<= 0] The following binding +1 votes were received: - Ate Douma - Matt Franklin - Suneel Marthi - Justin Mclean Thanks, Steve Blackmon sblack...@apache.org On

Re: [VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

Hey Justin Here is the Dockerfile and build commands I used to test the release with which gave me a successful build for the Apache HTrace (incubating) 4.2.0-rc0 release candidate -Jake [INFO] Apache HTrace . SUCCESS [2:49.326s] [INFO] htrace-c

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.0.0-incubating (rc2)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - All source files have ASF headers - No unexpected binaries in source - Can compile from source Convenience binary also looks good. You may want to consider adding

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC4

Hi, +1 binding but i did have a bit of trouble building from source I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - All ASF file have ASF headers - No unexpected binary files - manage to compile on OSX IMO It would be best if build

[VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.0.0-incubating (rc2)

Dear IPMC, Please vote for the following release candidate of Apache Fluo 1.0.0-incubating. PPMC vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b6ec5f17e277ed2d01e8df61eb1f1f42266cd30b9e114cb431c1c17@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E Staged dist artifacts:

Re: [VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

Hi, +0 binding as I had issues compiling (see below). Happy to change to +1 if I can compile everything else is good. I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is missing MIT licensed normalise.css bundled in several bootstrap files. e.g. [2].

Re: [VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

+1 -Jake Checks: - No unexpected binary file - Name contains incubating - Valid signatures and hashes - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE up to date - ASF headers for all source files On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > Resending this after being told

Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release (take 2)

+1, release contents look good. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:49 AM Thomas Draier wrote: > Hi all, > > The Unomi community has voted again for the release of Apache Unomi 1.1.0 > (incubating). Previous issue with license has been fixed, the dependency to > lgpl library has been

Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release (take 2)

Hi, +1 binding Checked for the source release: - name contains incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE good - NOTICE stills contains unneeded info re MIT licensed code [1]. While this is a minor documentation issue please remove in the next release. Notice files

Re: [VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

+1 (binding) On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:16 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Resending this after being told that I used an incorrect subject format. > > On 2016-09-29 21:20 (-0500), "Mike Drob" wrote: > > Dear IPMC, please vote on our latest release candidate as an

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

Hi, > This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same > in the next release, but be allowed (as I read it) under the licensing > rules. As long as it not compile source files it should be fine. It's not not binary files i.e. jpg and pngs and the like are ok. What does

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

I think the community behind this proposal is ready to accept defeat at this point. With DataStax' objection, the project simply can't be brought under the auspices of the ASF unless DataStax reverses its stance. Personally, I'm somewhat discouraged to see a company I once held in high regard

[CLOSED] [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

Thanks to all participating. Due to response from Datastax legal rep, this proposal at this moment considered "hostile" fork and hence no longer open for discussion. - Henry On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi All, > > Please find below a

Re: Toree's LGPL Dependency resolved!

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Gino Bustelo wrote: > Just wanted to announce that the Apache Toree team was able to work with > the JeroMQ (https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq) team to get their library > relicensed as MPL v2. This is a key milestone for the Toree project, as

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator On 2016-09-27 16:30 (-0400), Ate Douma wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > > > The ASF voting rules are

[VOTE] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC4

Hi IPMC, HAWQ community has voted and passed RC4 build. Previous IP issues have all been fixed. The Vote thread can be found: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-hawq-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCABJ%3DBRr4xY_J0AY6Jfdvzd_uyOQAsEr9UrF6chOnRy2dEGMwmQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E This is the 1st

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams version 0.3-incubating

+1 binding Verified signatures & hashes Verified compiles from source Verified LICENSE & NOTICE On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:43 AM Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 binding > > Checked: > > 1. Signatures and hashes are correct > 2. Compiles from source > 3. Verified Apache headers >

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

On 30 September 2016 at 11:39, Jim Apple wrote: > Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not > to clutter the VOTE thread. > > > - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15] > (not sure what this is) > > This (an

[VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

Resending this after being told that I used an incorrect subject format. On 2016-09-29 21:20 (-0500), "Mike Drob" wrote: > Dear IPMC, please vote on our latest release candidate as an Apache Incubator > project. > > Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below

[VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

Let's try this again (using lists.apache.org): +1 (binding) On 2016-09-27 16:30 (-0400), Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting

How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not to clutter the VOTE thread. > - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15] (not > sure what this is) This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same in the next release, but

Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

Hi Carl - is this a +1 to the release or to Tom's note about Strata/Hadoop World? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hey Jim, >> >> Just a quick note: I think several of

Re: Reuse Maven repository more

On Friday 30 September 2016, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > 28. 9. 2016 v 11:25, Greg Stein >: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jaroslav Tulach < > jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > >> ... > > > >> One idea that

Re: MySQL FOSS License Exception

As Shane points out, such "Special exceptions" would in theory be good enough for an open source project, but it restricts commercial downstream users beyond the ASF license (which gives them the "freedom" to NOT distribute the source) https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-x However

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:39 PM, jag wrote: > +1 (expressing unbridled enthusiasm and glee!!) Note: The above is James Gosling. :-) - Gj On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:39 PM, jag wrote: > +1 (expressing unbridled enthusiasm and glee!!) > > > > -- > View this message in

[VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release (take 2)

Hi all, The Unomi community has voted again for the release of Apache Unomi 1.1.0 (incubating). Previous issue with license has been fixed, the dependency to lgpl library has been removed. The vote thread can be found at :

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (expressing unbridled enthusiasm and glee!!) -- View this message in context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Accept-NetBeans-into-the-Apache-Incubator-tp51613p51725.html Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Can you un-open-source a product? Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

I think Apache should not take an active part in any forks, as it could ruin the long-standing approval with the commercial community. However I think going the Jenkins fork route is the way for these communities that want to move forward: Move to GitHub, change the name & logo, clean up IP,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams version 0.3-incubating

+1 binding Checked: 1. Signatures and hashes are correct 2. Compiles from source 3. Verified Apache headers 4. License and Notice files are good On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:13 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > Everything checked as pre previous email. > > Thanks, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

I like the re-licensing threat get it forked on github and prove to them there is a willing community out there! Tom On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:17 AM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > I'd leave it open for now. I imagine/hope there are enough people aware of > this thread that

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating Release

The Apache BatchEE and Incubator teams are pleased to announce the release of Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating. The release passes the JBatch 1.0 TCK test 1.1-b03. Sources are available on Apache download area ( https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/batchee) accessible through BatchEE

Re: Reuse Maven repository more

28. 9. 2016 v 11:25, Greg Stein : > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jaroslav Tulach > wrote: >> ... > >> One idea that keeps puzzling in my mind is to reuse central Maven >> repository >> more than we used to. If I understand correctly while the