Hi John,
Thanks a lot!
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2016年11月4日，上午10:15，John D. Ament 写道：
>
> I am about to do the next steps for you.
>
> John
>
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 PM Willem Jiang wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to join the IPMC. I'm a PMC member for Camel, CXF and have
>> also contri
+1
Fred
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> SystemML version 0.11.0!
>
> The PPMC vote thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> org/msg01097.html
>
> And the result:
> h
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:49 AM Felix Meschberger
wrote:
> Hi John
>
> My understanding is, that we are well aware of this concern, which others
> have mentioned as well.
>
> Also Greg noted in the proposal:
>
> > gstein sez: the podling can only graduate within an approved repository
> system. T
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:43 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> The proposal looks fine in general, but I'm slightly concerned about:
>https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/graphs/contributors
>
> It seems that the model so far has been -- through huge blobs of
> code over the wall. Given that the com
After seeing the PPMC respond quickly and sensibly to issues I identified
without push back, I'd be happy to see them graduate. (I'm also really
anxious to drive down our podling count)
John
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> Geode looks ready for gradu
The proposal looks fine in general, but I'm slightly concerned about:
https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/graphs/contributors
It seems that the model so far has been -- through huge blobs of
code over the wall. Given that the composition of initial committers
is all from Alibaba I hope their me
+1 !
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Cool.
>
> +1
>
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> >
> > Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache
> > RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to
> use
> > mess
Cool.
+1
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Please find below a proposal for a new Incubator podling named Apache
> RocketMQ, a fast, low latency, reliable, scalable, distributed, easy to use
> message-oriented middleware, especially for processing large amounts of
> streamin
Perfect, already added to the wiki.
Thanks, Felix.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Felix Meschberger
wrote:
> Hi Sergio
>
> Pleased to meet you and thanks for offering to become a mentor. That helps.
>
> Feel free to add yourself to the proposal
>
> Thanks
> Felix
>
> Am 04.11.2016 um 15:57 schr
Hi Sergio
Pleased to meet you and thanks for offering to become a mentor. That helps.
Feel free to add yourself to the proposal
Thanks
Felix
Am 04.11.2016 um 15:57 schrieb Sergio Fernández
mailto:wik...@apache.org>>:
Hi Felix,
most of the ASF project have successfully manage to keep using Gi
Hi Felix,
most of the ASF project have successfully manage to keep using GitHub for
PRs, having the master git repository in ASF-controlled infrastructure. In
the end it doesn't represent that big break on the common workflows. But
definitely something the podling could try to address during incub
Hi John
My understanding is, that we are well aware of this concern, which others have
mentioned as well.
Also Greg noted in the proposal:
> gstein sez: the podling can only graduate within an approved repository
> system. The IPMC may have a differing opinion, but from an Infra perspective:
Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
SystemML version 0.11.0!
The PPMC vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01097.html
And the result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01118.html
The tag
Thanks Justin,
We have addressed the issues you have found and we are starting to simplify
the released artifacts.
We have voted a new RC on the SystemML podling list and I should be sending
a new vote soon.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -1 binding due to LI
Hi Roman,
Geode looks ready for graduation to me.
+1
Regards
JB
On 11/03/2016 08:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
with the 1.0.0-incubating release officially out (huge kudos
to the team!) there's an overwhelming sentiment among
the Apache Geode community and its mentors that
it is time to
I raised the concern over using github as the primary repo. This is still
unresolved, as I understood it.
John
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]:
>
> - restructured the API Gateway references: It is ex
On 04/11/2016 13:36, Anthony Baker wrote:
> Thanks, updated with notes on RE50.
Excellent. Tx.
Mark
>
> Anthony
>
>> On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>>> Maturity assessment:
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GE
Thanks, updated with notes on RE50.
Anthony
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> Maturity assessment:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
>
> I'd like to see this updated to us
Hi all
I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]:
- restructured the API Gateway references: It is expected
that the API Gateway will be refactored with additional
code donated by IBM during incubation.
- added a note on the API Gateway’s dependency on OpenSSL
- added a no
Thanks, works.
Regards
Felix
> Am 04.11.2016 um 13:27 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz :
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
>> ...Can it please be reestablished for user FelixMeschberger ? ...
>
> You should be good now.
> -Bertrand
>
> --
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> ...Can it please be reestablished for user FelixMeschberger ? ...
You should be good now.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
F
Hi
As a mentor I have to add some updates to the OpenWhiskProposal but it looks
like my editing karma has been revoked.
Can it please be reestablished for user FelixMeschberger ?
Thanks
Felix
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-u
Slack is more stable than hipchat, some of the infra staff have had
difficulties with new versions of the desktop client breaking.
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 at 21:04 Wade Chandler wrote:
> Personally I tried gitter as GitHub was to come on-site at work, and
> planned to use it, and the experience was q
Thanks for welcome.
Jut FYI, creating the editable proposal page on the wiki ( maybe
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WeexProposal ) allows easy
collaboration! To get edit permission to edit Wiki, please send a mail
to general@i.a.o.
Thanks.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Longda Feng wrote:
Personally I tried gitter as GitHub was to come on-site at work, and
planned to use it, and the experience was quite horrible. Look at its app
reviews; I tend to agree with the low ones which get into its UX and
usability. Even creating a room or finding existing groups didn't seem to
work well (or
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...I'd also seek out
> some usability style testing from other users to make sure they're
> comfortable before doing anything permanent...
I should be able to help with that, at least.
-Bertrand
--
On 03/11/2016 19:47, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Maturity assessment:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Geode+Podling+Maturity+Assessment
I'd like to see this updated to use the latest version of the maturity
model.
Mark
-
I believe they are ready.
+1
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:47PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> with the 1.0.0-incubating release officially out (huge kudos
> to the team!) there's an overwhelming sentiment among
> the Apache Geode community and its mentors that
> it is time to consider graduati
I think for external chats we should rather recommend Gitter, which has
open rooms (anonymous lurking allowed) and "unlimited" searchable logs (and
unlimited number of users) and don't require workarounds with a sign up bot.
We did the same for Taverna, we tried an IRC chat, but its synchronous
na
29 matches
Mail list logo
