Hi Felix, most of the ASF project have successfully manage to keep using GitHub for PRs, having the master git repository in ASF-controlled infrastructure. In the end it doesn't represent that big break on the common workflows. But definitely something the podling could try to address during incubation.
I'd be happy to jump-in the proposal and help as mentor. Cheers, On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi John > > My understanding is, that we are well aware of this concern, which others > have mentioned as well. > > Also Greg noted in the proposal: > > > gstein sez: the podling can only graduate within an approved repository > system. The IPMC may have a differing opinion, but from an Infra > perspective: the OpenWhisk podling can continue with their usage of a > GitHub repository, but faces a clear obstacle: GitHub "as master [as > allowed by the Foundation]" must be approved and working before the > graduation, or they must migrate their primary to the Foundation's Git > repository (at git-wip) before they graduate. > > I think this sounds like a good compromise to work on and the poddling > intends to work actively with Infra to see that we can stay in GitHub. If > that is not possible, we byte the bullet accordingly. > > In addition, also according to Greg: > > > We require that anybody committing to a GitHub repository authenticates > with BOTH: GitHub, and the ASF. No commits without that multiple > authentication. (this is based on our current experiments with Whimsy and > Traffic Server; same rules would apply to this podling) > > The original discussion took place after the initial submission, see [1] > > Does that help ? > > Regards > Felix > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1c22a29b69e944ee725278aae05bd4 > 1dea80d10d0d204c26eb4cb24c@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > Am 04.11.2016 um 15:20 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > I raised the concern over using github as the primary repo. This is > still > > unresolved, as I understood it. > > > > John > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi all > >> > >> I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]: > >> > >> - restructured the API Gateway references: It is expected > >> that the API Gateway will be refactored with additional > >> code donated by IBM during incubation. > >> - added a note on the API Gateway’s dependency on OpenSSL > >> - added a note on Trademarks IBM is currently pursuing and > >> intends to transfer to ASF > >> - fixed some typos > >> > >> With these changes and no discussions over the course of the recent > weeks, > >> I would propose we could could vote for OpenWhisk to become an > incubating > >> project over the course of next weeks. > >> > >> Of course we are still open to welcome interested people to become > initial > >> committers to OpenWhisk Servlerless Runtime and API Gateway ! > >> > >> WDYT ? > >> > >> Regards > >> Felix > >> > >> [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWhiskProposal > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co w: http://redlink.co
