+1 to both in principle (yay), but with admin access not initially given to
podling committers; as that could encourage "business as usual" for adding
friends&family as committers without a vote.
So I agree that the transition of the existing repositories need to be
handled well.
On 7 Nov 2016 10
Welcome Justin, that's really great:)
Thanks.
luke
Best Regards!
-
Luke Han
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:07 PM, vongosling wrote:
> Justin:
>
> welcome you join our mentor list ~😊
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Von Gosling
>
> 2016-11-08 10:53 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean :
>
> > Hi,
> >
>
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>...
> > As one of the member of the IPMC, I would very much like to see
> > podlings set up *EXACTLY* like PMCs, albeit with oversight by mentors.
> > That means non-IPMC members are NOT removed, and committers in the
> > "incubator" group are
Justin:
welcome you join our mentor list ~😊
Best Regards,
Von Gosling
2016-11-08 10:53 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean :
> Hi,
>
> I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the
> project is willing to have me that is :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> --
All,
Not a lot has changed in the podling report. We still have 7 podlings
missing sign off from mentors. Please review your podlings quickly and
provide them feedback.
John
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 AM John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> Please find the current board report below. As usual I
+1
Thks
Amol
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote:
> +1!
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton >
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
> >
> > > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> > >
> > > Is the Podling (and the
+1!
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
> >
> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> > people affiliated with a single company
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
>
> Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
> people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
> commits over the past year and, as far
Hi,
I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the project
is willing to have me that is :-)
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mai
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see
> > answered to be able to move forward on this.
> >
> > - Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see
> answered to be able to move forward on this.
>
> - Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of the ACL.
> Specifically, when the podling joins the incubator
I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see
answered to be able to move forward on this.
- Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of the ACL.
Specifically, when the podling joins the incubator, I expect that the
"OpenWhisk" organization be handed over to
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP hurdle.
> Has that been resolved?
LDAP is tens of hours worth of work - total. And I volunteered to do
the bulk of the initial effort. Frankly, it is more of a timing
conside
Hi Folks!
Sadly, other commitments in my life require that I step down the amount of
volunteer time I spend on the ASF. I had originally thought that I'd still have
time for mentoring the two podlings I've been involved with (Gossip and Rya),
but it doesn't look that way.
As such, I'm hoping s
Reading the other thread on this it seems it has not yet. Let me know if
any external to infra help is wanted.
Thanks.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 16:29 Phil Sorber wrote:
> I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP
> hurdle. Has that been resolved?
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 1
I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP hurdle.
Has that been resolved?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 15:24 Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has
> requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein ou
It does, Joe, but the IPMC needs to decide whether to even *ask* ... It is
an entirely reasonable position to say that focusing primary development at
GitHub could hurt some aspect of ASF-style community building, and (thus)
the IPMC does not want to allow that.
Infra will start with OpenWhisk (if
With regard to the second question I hope the ultimate decision still rests
with Greg. This idea is fairly new and some baby steps are in order before
opening the floodgates.
IMO
On Monday, November 7, 2016, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling bei
Hi,
As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has
requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra Admin
has OK’ed this for OpenWhisk iff the IPMC is OK with it.
I ask now:
1. Is the IPMC OK with this for OpenWhisk?
2. Is the IPMC OK with this
Awesome. Let me in.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]:
>
> - restructured the API Gateway references: It is expected
>that the API Gateway will be refactored with additional
>code donated by IBM
+1
On 2016-11-06 12:58 (-0800), Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> after a very positive discussion in the Geode community
> and at the IPMC level:
> http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6
> I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote.
>
> Please vote on the resoluti
I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me.
Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with
people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all
commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority
of tickets and email, as well
+1 (binding). Great work!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA
+1!
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > --Mark
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández
> > > wrote:
+1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl wrote:
> +1
>
> --Mark
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > good luck, guys!
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM,
+1
--Mark
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > good luck, guys!
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shapos
Hi Incubator PMC,Â
The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to
release Apache Streams 0.4 (incubating).
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this
incubator release.Â
PPMC and IPMC feedback received during rc1 and rc2 votes (respectiv
I sent notice.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:02 PM Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Hi,
> I (apache ID "niclas") would like to rejoin the Incubator PMC.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
I've added you, happy editing.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:08 PM BonoLv wrote:
> My incubator wiki user name is "BonoLv" . Please grant write access
> permission for me .
>
> Thx.
>
Hi, Guys:
I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to focus
our design attention about RocketMQ. Also, we have removed some mistakenly
imported dependency.
IMO, we are ready to accept contributions from other Apache projects 😊
Thanks every apacher's advice and help, We h
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ
> communities to
> > build cross platform clients?
> > - How can RocketMQ look to leverage Cassandra, Geo
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ communities to
> build cross platform clients?
> - How can RocketMQ look to leverage Cassandra, Geode, Derby as backend
> persistence stores?...
It would be wrong to require
32 matches
Mail list logo
