Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

+1 to both in principle (yay), but with admin access not initially given to podling committers; as that could encourage "business as usual" for adding friends as committers without a vote. So I agree that the transition of the existing repositories need to be handled well. On 7 Nov 2016 10:23

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Welcome Justin, that's really great:) Thanks. luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:07 PM, vongosling wrote: > Justin: > > welcome you join our mentor list ~ > > Best Regards, > > Von Gosling > > 2016-11-08 10:53 GMT+08:00 Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >... > > As one of the member of the IPMC, I would very much like to see > > podlings set up *EXACTLY* like PMCs, albeit with oversight by mentors. > > That means non-IPMC members are NOT removed, and committers in the >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Justin: welcome you join our mentor list ~ Best Regards, Von Gosling 2016-11-08 10:53 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the > project is willing to have me that is :-) > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

All, Not a lot has changed in the podling report. We still have 7 podlings missing sign off from mentors. Please review your podlings quickly and provide them feedback. John On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 AM John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Please find the current board

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 Thks Amol On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > +1! > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > > > > I was looking at

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1! On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me. > > > > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me. > > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with > people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all > commits over the

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the project is willing to have me that is :-) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see > > answered to be able to move forward on this. > > > > - Who

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see > answered to be able to move forward on this. > > - Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of the ACL. > Specifically, when the

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see answered to be able to move forward on this. - Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of the ACL. Specifically, when the podling joins the incubator, I expect that the "OpenWhisk" organization be handed over to

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Phil Sorber wrote: > I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP hurdle. > Has that been resolved? LDAP is tens of hours worth of work - total. And I volunteered to do the bulk of the initial effort. Frankly, it is more

Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

Hi Folks! Sadly, other commitments in my life require that I step down the amount of volunteer time I spend on the ASF. I had originally thought that I'd still have time for mentoring the two podlings I've been involved with (Gossip and Rya), but it doesn't look that way. As such, I'm hoping

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

Reading the other thread on this it seems it has not yet. Let me know if any external to infra help is wanted. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 16:29 Phil Sorber wrote: > I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP > hurdle. Has that been resolved? > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

I am +1 on both as well. My understanding is that there was an LDAP hurdle. Has that been resolved? On Mon, Nov 7, 2016, 15:24 Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has > requested to use GitHub as its primary

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

It does, Joe, but the IPMC needs to decide whether to even *ask* ... It is an entirely reasonable position to say that focusing primary development at GitHub could hurt some aspect of ASF-style community building, and (thus) the IPMC does not want to allow that. Infra will start with OpenWhisk

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

With regard to the second question I hope the ultimate decision still rests with Greg. This idea is fairly new and some baby steps are in order before opening the floodgates. IMO On Monday, November 7, 2016, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may have seen the

[DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

Hi, As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now has requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra Admin has OK’ed this for OpenWhisk iff the IPMC is OK with it. I ask now: 1. Is the IPMC OK with this for OpenWhisk? 2. Is the IPMC OK with this

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Awesome. Let me in. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all > > I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]: > > - restructured the API Gateway references: It is expected >that the API Gateway will be refactored with additional >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On 2016-11-06 12:58 (-0800), Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote. > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me. Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with people affiliated with a single company providing more than 90% of all commits over the past year and, as far as I can tell, the vast majority of tickets and email, as well

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 (binding). Great work! ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010) Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1! On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Nabarun Nag wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl wrote: > > > +1 > > > > --Mark > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:11 AM Mark Bretl wrote: > +1 > > --Mark > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 --Mark On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Avinash Dongre wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > good luck, guys! > > > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 11:42 PM, John D. Ament > >

[VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

Hi Incubator PMC,  The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to release Apache Streams 0.4 (incubating). We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator release.  PPMC and IPMC feedback received during rc1 and rc2 votes

Re: Request to join Incubator PMC

I sent notice. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:02 PM Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Hi, > I (apache ID "niclas") would like to rejoin the Incubator PMC. > > Thanks > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java >

Re: Please grant wiki write access for me

I've added you, happy editing. On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:08 PM BonoLv wrote: > My incubator wiki user name is "BonoLv" . Please grant write access > permission for me . > > Thx. >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, Guys: I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to focus our design attention about RocketMQ. Also, we have removed some mistakenly imported dependency. IMO, we are ready to accept contributions from other Apache projects  Thanks every apacher's advice and help, We

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ > communities to > > build cross platform clients? > > -

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi, On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ communities to > build cross platform clients? > - How can RocketMQ look to leverage Cassandra, Geode, Derby as backend > persistence stores?... It