Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Liang Chen
Hi John Thanks for your comments. Because CarbonData is data format, for supporting multiple language(such as:Java,C++,C...) for satisfying different users, the source code(format files) could be compiled by Apache Thrift. As we discussed in the previous release session: 1. The build command

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating (RC1)

2017-01-26 Thread Mike Jumper
On Jan 26, 2017 19:22, "Justin Mclean" wrote: ... - client LICENSE is missing license for this file [1] (mostly likely BSD but not 100% sure). Server LICENSE is fine. Can you fix this in the next release. Sure thing: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-186

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating (RC1)

2017-01-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - names include incubating - signature and hashes good - please update year in NOTICE - client LICENSE is missing license for this file [1] (mostly likely BSD but not 100% sure). Server LICENSE is fine. Can you fix this in the next release. - No unexpected binary files

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread John D. Ament
LIang, Regarding the use of carbondata-format, during the last release this issue came up as well. My understanding was that it was to be fixed in this release. Is that no longer the case? John On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:04 PM Liang Chen wrote: > Hi Justin > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Liang Chen
Hi Justin Thanks for your checking. 1.Please install Apache Thrift 0.9.3 for compiling "carbondata-format", please find the build guide: https://github.com/apache/incubator-carbondata/tree/master/build (Remark:Once the release be published , general users don't need to install Thrift, the

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

2017-01-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I also be -1 binding on this due to missing DISCLAIMER, ASF header issues and a possible binary release issue. I checked: - name includes incubating - signatures good - DISCLAIMER is missing - License is OK - Year needs updating in NOTICE. - A large number of files seem to have have

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +0 (binding) woudl change to +1 if I could compile I checked - name includes incubating - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good (year in NOTICE needs updating) - No unexpected binaries - A couple of source files are missing headers [1][2]. Can you fix this in the next release release.

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

2017-01-26 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:06 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > Its not clear if you intended this to be the IPMC vote or the dev vote. > > > > Sorry. it is my first time doing incubator project release.

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

2017-01-26 Thread Sijie Guo
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:06 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Its not clear if you intended this to be the IPMC vote or the dev vote. > Sorry. it is my first time doing incubator project release. If I made something wrong, please let me know. This is vote is intended to for

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Gangumalla, Uma
+1 (binding) Regards, Uma On 1/24/17, 4:59 AM, "Jacky Li" <13561...@qq.com> wrote: >Hi Incubator PMC, > >Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache >CarbonData(incubating) version 1.0.0. > >PPMC has passed the vote, here's the PPMC vote thread for 1.0.0 release:

[REQUEST] Please add PR-related item to podling graduation checklist

2017-01-26 Thread Sally Khudairi
Hello Apache Incubator team --I hope you are all well. John Ament (copied) suggested I write to you regarding promoting a podling's graduation. Would it be possible to include a line item somewhere on  http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html along the lines of:  > "PPMCs: please

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

2017-01-26 Thread John D. Ament
Yes, you have special bits. So you can do certain things that not everyone can. John On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:14 PM Henri Yandell wrote: > Previously I've branched the git repo, modified and then emailed Infra > about the branch. Maybe that's an older process or because I

[VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating (RC1)

2017-01-26 Thread Mike Jumper
Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Guacamole 0.9.11-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas 0.7.1 (incubating) RC3

2017-01-26 Thread Madhan Neethiraj
Incubator PMC, Thank you for taking time to verify the release and your votes. The vote has passed with 4 “+1” votes from IPMC members and no “0” or “-1” votes. IPMC vote thread is at:

Re: Mentor docs: Incubator Access Authorization

2017-01-26 Thread Henri Yandell
Previously I've branched the git repo, modified and then emailed Infra about the branch. Maybe that's an older process or because I had some Infra or Chair privs. Hen On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:59 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > TBH, I can't comprehend the first line.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CarbonData 1.0.0-incubating release (RC2)

2017-01-26 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) - Henry On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Jacky Li <13561...@qq.com> wrote: > Hi Incubator PMC, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > CarbonData(incubating) version 1.0.0. > > PPMC has passed the vote, here's the PPMC vote thread for 1.0.0 release: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache DistributedLog release 0.4.0-incubating

2017-01-26 Thread John D. Ament
Its not clear if you intended this to be the IPMC vote or the dev vote. -1 Since the release does not include the DISCLAIMER file and README does not include the DISCLAIMER text (either would be fine per policy, but generally we look for DISCLAIMER). There were no binaries in the source. NOTICE