Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > We didnt change the headers (see > https://github.com/WASdev/standards.jsr352.jbatch/blob/master/com.ibm.jbatch.container/src/main/java/com/ibm/jbatch/container/impl/RetryHandler.java). Then I’m slightly confused as you have 450+ files with ASF headers and 120+ with IBM ones. Now I don’t

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
We didnt change the headers (see https://github.com/WASdev/standards.jsr352.jbatch/blob/master/com.ibm.jbatch.container/src/main/java/com/ibm/jbatch/container/impl/RetryHandler.java). What would be a better mention in NOTICE? Le 11 déc. 2017 07:26, "Justin Mclean" a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The root NOTICE references the donation but files are under apache v2 > license anyway, even referencing IBM so should be good. OKish, perhaps, but given we’re taking about 120 or so files rather than just a couple so I think it would be better if it was fixed. The NOTICE statement is

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi Justin The root NOTICE references the donation but files are under apache v2 license anyway, even referencing IBM so should be good. Romain Le 11 déc. 2017 07:02, "Justin Mclean" a écrit : Hi, I’m not 100% sure I would vote +1 on this release due to possible

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

2017-12-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 (binding) until category B issue resolved [3], then I would be +1 on the release. I checked: - incubating in release name - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE files content good - noticed one file possibly not having the correct header [1], but all other files look good -

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’m not 100% sure I would vote +1 on this release due to possible header issues (copyright IBM) and missing license information, but it’s probably in the “please fix for next release” category. Where these files with IBM headers a part of the donation or do they come from other 3rd party

IPMC join request

2017-12-10 Thread Timothy Chen
Hi all, I'd like to request joining IPMC, initially to help mentor ServiceComb incubator project but also looking forward to help mentor other Apache incubator projects. I'm not yet an Apache member. I've been PPMC for Apache Drill (saw incubation to TLP) and Mesos. Let me know if there is any

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread sebb
On 10 December 2017 at 19:54, Mark Struberg wrote: > > >> Am 10.12.2017 um 13:30 schrieb sebb : >> >>> >>> And one more drawback is that ditching a failed release from SVN will _not_ >>> free the occupied storage. >>> That might or might not be an

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Mark Struberg
> Am 10.12.2017 um 13:30 schrieb sebb : > >> >> And one more drawback is that ditching a failed release from SVN will _not_ >> free the occupied storage. >> That might or might not be an issue. > > Infra have ways of dealing with that if necessary. Hmm, no. Not that I'm

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - December 2017

2017-12-10 Thread John D. Ament
All, Below is the current draft of our report. As of now, we have 5 reports missing and 4 reports not signed off on. I hope we can get that resolved in the next few days. I have copied those podlings impacted. Incubator PMC report for December 2017 The Apache Incubator is the entry path into

[GitHub] incubator pull request #2: Add text about removing a mentor

2017-12-10 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/2 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread sebb
On 10 December 2017 at 10:35, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> If you put them under /dev/ for the vote, that makes it easier for the >> reviewer to see what is actually intended for the release area. > > Yes and no. Where do we get this zip from? > The answer is: from

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 10 déc. 2017 11:35, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > If you put them under /dev/ for the vote, that makes it easier for the > reviewer to see what is actually intended for the release area. Yes and no. Where do we get this zip from? The answer is: from

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-10 Thread Mark Struberg
> If you put them under /dev/ for the vote, that makes it easier for the > reviewer to see what is actually intended for the release area. Yes and no. Where do we get this zip from? The answer is: from repository.apache.org. Because all this is set up in the ASF own apache-parent pom.xml! You

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

2017-12-10 Thread Pierre Smits
HI Justin, All, Great to see this initiative culminating here. Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OEM - The OFBiz Extensions Marketplace1 http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ 1 not affiliated to (and not endorsed by) the OFBiz project On