Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2

Hi Justin Can you elaborate a bit ? I checked the NOTICE file and it looks good to me. It mentions the included dependencies like bootstrap. Thanks Regards JB Le 1 avr. 2018 à 01:08, à 01:08, Justin Mclean a écrit: >Hi, > >-1 binding as NOTICE should not contain

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(3rd round)

Hi, Sebb I miss one question, the tag name is v5.0.0-alpha . sorry. ---Original--- From: "sebb" Date: Sun, Apr 1, 2018 08:28 AM To: "general"; Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(3rd round) On 1 April

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version5.0.0-alpha(3rd round)

Hi sebb, I see your point, that is why we provide the build document[1] if you want to build from GitHub tag. Git submodules are used in our project for binding multi repos. The source codes tar is provided by running some source code release process, by following project document[2] and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2

Hi the content is simply. " Apache Gobblin Copyright 2017-2018 The Apache Software Foundation This product includes software developed at The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). This product includes Bootstrap Copyright (c) 2011-2015 Twitter, Inc. This product includes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha(3rd round)

On 1 April 2018 at 00:53, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: >> Please include the SCM URL in the VOTE email, as the tag and commitId >> aren't much use without it. > > > > Hi Sebb > > > The SCM url with tag is this : > https://github.com/apache/incubator-skywalking/tree/v5.0.0-alpha > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha(3rd round)

> Please include the SCM URL in the VOTE email, as the tag and commitId > aren't much use without it. Hi Sebb The SCM url with tag is this : https://github.com/apache/incubator-skywalking/tree/v5.0.0-alpha Thanks. -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking original creator and PPMC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha (3rd round)

On 31 March 2018 at 05:07, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > Hi All, > This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) version > 5.0.0-alpha. > > > The Apache SkyWalking community has tested, voted and approved the proposed > release of Apache SkyWalking (Incubating)

Re: [DISCUSS] Absent mentors

Hi, > As for the metric -- I really think that using mentor turnout on release > voting threads will serve us well. My concern with using that as a metric is people will just vote +1 without doing a thorough check and we may end up with more releases with issues. Possibly a better metric is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha (3rd round)

Hi, +1 binding I checked - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE all good - No unexpected binary files - All source files have headers - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin

New SBT plugin for Rat

Hello all, Based on some work I've been experimenting with using SBT for Log4j Scala API, I wrote an Apache Rat interface for SBT [1]. It's pretty minimal for now (no docs or site, only supports some of the rat options), but it already does some of what the ant and maven plugins do. Usage: in

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2

Hi, -1 binding as NOTICE should not contain copyrights of bundled 3rd party software. The NOTICE file needs to only contain what is required (and not already in LICENSE) and needs to be as small as possible as it affects downstream projects. [2] I checked: - incubating in name - signatures

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

Hi, +1 binding I checked - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE all good - No unexpected binary files - All source files have headers - Can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

On 31 March 2018 at 16:33, Justin Mclean wrote: > License information goes in LICENSE not NOTICE and only copyright > information in from relocated headers goes in NOTICE (i.e. which would be > from a software grant) Copyright lines from 3rd party bundled software >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

Hi, +1 binding Re the “NOTICE” file [1] I’m not sure it is a notice file as we know it as it's contents are not what you would normally find in a notice file. I checked: - name includes incubating - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE all good - No unexpected binary files - All source files

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

Hi, > What we've generally used it for in the past is for when we copy in outside > source code wholesale. See for example: > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/NOTICE.txt Which doesn’t look correct to me but I may have the URLs wrong: - Re ResolverUtil.java is ALv2 license

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha (3rd round)

+1 looks good Le 31 mars 2018 18:05, "Matt Sicker" a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > * Signatures ok > * Rat check ok > * Disclaimer, license, notice files all present > * Build and test ok > > > On 30 March 2018 at 23:07, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > > > Hi All, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha (3rd round)

+1 (binding) * Signatures ok * Rat check ok * Disclaimer, license, notice files all present * Build and test ok On 30 March 2018 at 23:07, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > Hi All, > This is a call for vote to release Apache SkyWalking (Incubating) version > 5.0.0-alpha. > > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1 - Second Attempt

What we've generally used it for in the past is for when we copy in outside source code wholesale. See for example: < https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/NOTICE.txt> On 30 March 2018 at 21:45, Willem Jiang wrote: > Hi Matt， > > I checked the vertx

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2

+1 (binding) Checked build, signatures & headers, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE and LICENSE. Regards JB Le 27 mars 2018 à 02:01, à 02:01, Abhishek Tiwari a écrit: >The Apache Gobblin community has voted on and approved the release of >Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 (incubating): >