Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

2018-09-09 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (binding) So far I've checked: * signatures and digests (md5 checksums can be removed) * source releases file layouts * matched git tags and commit ids * incubator suffix and disclaimer * LICENSE & NOTICE files look good * no binary files in the source release * clean build (osx 10.12.6) I'd

Re: No more incubator report timeline emails?

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Yep sorry my fault, I can see that they should be run manually the last Wednesday of the month. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Default project guidelines

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, There been some discussion on bylaws/guidelines recently and it was suggest that the IPMC document a default set for projects to use. So I’ve come up with a default set of guidelines [1] using links to existing content when I could find it. I tried to make it as minimal as possible.

Re: [VOTE]- Release Apache Weex (Incubating) 0.19.0 [RC4]

2018-09-09 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi Hanks, I just checked the release vote mail, it's just for rc3 not for the rc4. Can you update the link for voted mail? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:51 PM Hanks Zhang wrote: > > Dear IPMC members, > > This is a call for the vote to release

Re: New podlings reporting schedule is monthly for 3 months

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > I'm a bit curious about why this was sent, so I'll bite. Because a new podling didn’t report monthly for the first 3 months as they are required to. > I'm a mentor on a brand new podling. The report template should have been > generated on 8/29, the day before this podling was accepted

Re: New podlings reporting schedule is monthly for 3 months

2018-09-09 Thread Luciano Resende
I am probably on a similar situation with a new podling that I delayed the setup a bit due to conferences. We will start reporting next month. On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 8:20 PM John D. Ament wrote: > I'm a bit curious about why this was sent, so I'll bite. > > I'm a mentor on a brand new podling.

Re: No more incubator report timeline emails?

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > I've noticed in the past few months, the incubator report timeline emails > have stopped. I’m not sure they were automated. I’ve posted the draft for this month here which includes the dates due, but in future I include the dates in the email to this list so people know without

Re: Incubator release checklist

2018-09-09 Thread ???? Sheng Wu
Hi Justin Good checklist, like it. -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking -- Original -- From: "justin"; Date: Mon, Sep 10, 2018 08:31 AM To: "general"; Subject: Incubator release checklist HI, As part of the workshop I ran recently I

Re: New podlings reporting schedule is monthly for 3 months

2018-09-09 Thread John D. Ament
I'm a bit curious about why this was sent, so I'll bite. I'm a mentor on a brand new podling. The report template should have been generated on 8/29, the day before this podling was accepted into the incubator. Yet for some reason, they had a report due. I'm not actually sure why this was the

No more incubator report timeline emails?

2018-09-09 Thread John D. Ament
Hi, I've noticed in the past few months, the incubator report timeline emails have stopped. I had previously used this as a reminder as a mentor to ensure my podlings were reporting (since in all honesty, I'm not subscribed to all the dev lists). Is there a reason this was dropped? I see that

Re: Incubator release checklist

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Great, some of these are accomplished by one line commands, maybe would be > good to add those into the checklist as well. Mostly, but It's going to vary from project to project depending on on the build process and technology and a lot of it is manual observation. We could possibly

Re: Incubator release checklist

2018-09-09 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 5:31 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > As part of the workshop I ran recently I had people look at a real release > and go though a checklist before voting on it, it my be of some help other > people checking releases. I’ve just added a version of it to the incubator >

Re: Incubator Workshop

2018-09-09 Thread Willem Jiang
Yeah, I'm totally agree with that. >From my experience, I really learn a lot by checking the mail thread discussion and verifying the kit myself with the help of checklist. Maybe we can encourage the people to participate the vote in the general@incubator to get the field experience. Willem Jiang

Re: Incubator Workshop

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I think an online version would be really helpful. > As for the self-paced version, I think just making the recording available > later should be enough. The reason I suggested a self paced one it that includes a number of activities, checking a real release, voting on committers and teh

Re: Incubator Workshop

2018-09-09 Thread Yaniv Rodenski
Hi Justin, I think an online version would be really helpful. As for the self-paced version, I think just making the recording available later should be enough. Cheers, Yaniv On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 10:30 am, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > A few month back I ran an incubator workshop at FOSS

Incubator release checklist

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, As part of the workshop I ran recently I had people look at a real release and go though a checklist before voting on it, it my be of some help other people checking releases. I’ve just added a version of it to the incubator wiki. [1] Feedback welcome. Thanks, Justin 1.

Incubator Workshop

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, A few month back I ran an incubator workshop at FOSS backstage that covered making and voting on releases and voting on committers into the projects. It had several exercises Would anyone be interested in either a: 1) Online self-paced version 2) Online live version (i.e. me going through

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-RC2

2018-09-09 Thread Ignasi Barrera
That's why I meant when I said finding the build instructions was trivial enough that I thought it should not block a release. The README contains a clear link to the Documentation (which is a link to a local file), and that file is a very comprehensive index with direct links to architecture,

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

2018-09-09 Thread Adina Crainiceanu
Justin, Can you please remove Josh Elser from the list of inactive mentors for Rya? He only missed the last report and he is always available when we have questions. Thank you, Adina On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > There been several discussions over several

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I honestly don't have the time to mentor them in an official capacity - if > I'm listed as anything but champion, then yes, remove me as a mentor. I'll > continue in a low-capacity to provide help when I can, but I have other > priorities first and foremost :) Done and sorted. Thanks,

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

2018-09-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 09/09/2018 11:33 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: HI, There seems to be a bit of confusion here. I am not a mentor for Annotator, yet I am listed as one. You listed as one here. [1] It get it’s info (I believe) from the podling.xml files which has this in it for Annotator:

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > There seems to be a bit of confusion here. I am not a mentor for Annotator, > yet I am listed as one. You listed as one here. [1] It get it’s info (I believe) from the podling.xml files which has this in it for Annotator: Nick Kew Brian McCallister

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

2018-09-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
There seems to be a bit of confusion here. I am not a mentor for Annotator, yet I am listed as one. I did champion it (and offer advice/help on occasion), but AIUI the champion's duties officially stop once the project has entered incubation and gotten set up. If this is not the case, then our

Re: Email to be sent to inactive mentors

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Perhaps add some recognition in the text of the email that there may > be activity that we are unaware of? (Unlikely, but it seems rude to > presume.) I guess it’s possible you can mentor by just watching and only directing were needed, so if everything going well there may be no need for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-RC2

2018-09-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Justin, given that the next release will provide this information so clearly > from the base directory, knowing that the next release will be in order, are > you ok with letting this release pass through? That is not up to me, that is up for other IPMC members to vote +1 on it. Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.3 [RC5]

2018-09-09 Thread Willem Jiang
Sorry, I just got some time back to this thread. I just went through the dev discussion of the dubbo and found out dubbo community are planning the next release cut by discussion the bug fix list first. I'm sure we could do it better in the next release. Here are my +1 for this vote. I can build

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-RC2

2018-09-09 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> First of all, there is a direct link to that build page, in README of > master and 5.x branches. See > https://github.com/apache/incubator-skywalking#compiling-project > We have both links to document and compiling guide. This is excellent in my opinion. >From the terminal I can read the