Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Hi, > [1]http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#what It’s explained in that link there i.e. "The Apache Software Foundation produces open source software. All releases are in the form of the source materials needed to make changes to the software being released”. Thanks, Justin

Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Hi, I just have a question about the Binary jars in the source release. According the Apache release policy, I cannot find any rule about the binary jars cannot be in the source release[1]. If we just have jars for testing purposes and those jar won't be a part of convenience binary release, I

DataSketches Proposal

Thanks for the offer. i am a neophyte at this process and email app! I could use a lot of help getting this off the ground! Also, I'm not sure that Mr. Chen and Mr. Onofré have fully accepted taking this on :) Lee. On 2019/02/23 06:03:58, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Nice. > > I would very

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

Nice. I would very much like to help mentor this project, though you already have a couple good ones. I concur with incubator as sponsoring entity. Kenn (VP Apache Beam) On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:45 PM leerho wrote: > I didn't realize that this mail list does not accept PDF files, apparently

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

I didn't realize that this mail list does not accept PDF files, apparently only text. So let me try one more time ... :) Please let me know if this works! = Apache DataSketches Proposal[1] = == Abstract == DataSketches.GitHub.io is an open source, high-performance library of stochastic

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

The subject line has me interested already. Follow examples like this maybe? 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a5db74cc9e5ae89b3bfa5f4b07bfcc18dae84b7098232fb897cd47b7@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E 2.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

I'll try again ... :) On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:00 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > It didn't make it again > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019, 8:35 PM leerho wrote: > > > I'm not sure the attached document made it through. > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 7:28 PM leerho wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

It didn't make it again On Fri, Feb 22, 2019, 8:35 PM leerho wrote: > I'm not sure the attached document made it through. > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 7:28 PM leerho wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

I'm not sure the attached document made it through. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 7:28 PM leerho wrote: > >

[VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave (incubating) for Apache Karaf version 0.1.2

Hello All, This is a call for vote to release Apache Zipkin Brave (incubating) for Apache Karaf version 0.1.2 The Apache Zipkin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Zipkin Brave (incubating) for Apache Karaf version 0.1.2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC

Re: [RFC] Mentors and podling LDAP memberships

Yes, yes, not necessarily. First: " For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers. " --

[VOTE FAILED] Release Apache Zipkin Brave Karaf (Incubating) version 0.1.2

This vote failed due to binaries in the distribution. Will send a new vote shortly. Thanks for the input, all. -A On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM Adrian Cole wrote: > > Perfectly fine naming suggestion. thanks, Dave. > > "Apache Zipkin Brave (incubating) for Apache Karaf" > > I will put that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

I'll check that out after coming home from my party trip to Utrecht ;-) If this is required to build, I think it should be mentioned in the readme. Chris Outlook für Android herunterladen From: Craig Russell Sent: Saturday, February 23,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

> On Feb 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > (1) To be fixed on the next release: > (a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source release zip. > Refer the users back to the location: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/daffodil/KEYS >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi all, I have started verifying this release ... however this is the first time I am validating a project I'm not directly involved in. So I found some things that are different than with the other projects (Not sure if this is bad or good though) So here goes: 1) No KEYS file (Think this

[Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hi all, I have opened a thread to vote the Cava proposal into the incubator [0]. At the same time, I have engaged with the list on searching a better name for the project [1]. Out of this initial thread, we have singled out a list of names. Here are the names: - Rainbow (after the name of my

Re: Updating HTrace podling page with retirement status

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 12:34, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > Hi all, > > Unless I'm missing something, the HTrace podling page ( > http://htrace.incubator.apache.org/) has no indication that the project has > been retired (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/htrace.html). The > website should be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Composer (incubating) 0.10.0

A gentle reminder to IPMC members to please consider voting on this proposed podling release. OpenWhisk's only mentor (Bertrand) has voted +1, but we need two more binding votes to be able to proceed. thanks, --dave On 2019/02/18 22:14:47, "David P Grove" wrote: > > > The Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Composer (incubating) 0.10.0

Hi, On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:15 PM David P Grove wrote: > The source code artifact of openwhisk composer can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/openwhisk/apache-openwhisk-0.10.0-incubating-rc1/openwhisk-composer-0.10.0-incubating-sources.tar.gz +1 for the release

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

The mailing lists have been created and we're good to go. Please send a mail to dev-subscr...@training.apache.org if you want to subscribe and would like to join the discussion. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:10 AM Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:45 AM Gosling Von wrote: > > > +1

[RFC] Mentors and podling LDAP memberships

Are podling mentors expected to be in the LDAP owners group (i.e. on the PPMC) and in the members group (i.e. committers)? This affects Whimsy: should it report discrepancies, e.g. mentors not in the committers group? It also potentially affects graduation: normally at least some mentors drop

[VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

Hello Incubator Community, The Apache DLab community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache DLab (incubating) version 2.1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote in this release. DLab is a platform for creating self-service, exploratory data science