Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-27 Thread kellen sunderland
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 10:15 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra < > henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > şunu yazdı: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-27 Thread Furkan KAMACI
+1 (binding) 28 Şub 2019 Per, saat 08:40 tarihinde Henry Saputra şunu yazdı: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal > > itself can > > be found on the wiki [2]. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-27 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal > itself can > be found on the wiki [2]. > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the > new > TVM project

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-27 Thread Byung-Gon Chun
+1 (binding) On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal > itself can > be found on the wiki [2]. > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the > new > TVM project

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-27 Thread Sebastian
+1 (binding) On 27.02.19 23:44, Markus Weimer wrote: Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki [2]. According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new TVM project as a podling in the Apache

Re: Mentor review of releases was: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

2019-02-27 Thread Henry Saputra
I agree, this will be good learning experience for the podling PPMC. Thanks Craig. On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:02 PM Craig Russell wrote: > I think this is a good opportunity for me to suggest: > > As part of mentorship, review of releases is a requirement. > > This vote passed in the podling

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-27 Thread Sheng Zha
+1 (non-binding) -sz On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Markus Weimer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal > itself can > be found on the wiki [2]. > > According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the > new > TVM

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-27 Thread Henry Saputra
Bit more clarifications, as new podling in Apache, the initial members of PPMC consist of mentors and initial commiters of the project. I understand TVM already work mirroring ASF meritoracy [1] but we need to change the proposal to follow Apache guidelines to help us cross check membership later

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-27 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) NOTICE, LICENSE, and DISCLAIMER files exist ASF Header exists and correct No executable files in source artifact - Henry On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Piyush Ghai wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks everyone for spending the time to test and vote. > > This vote passes with 5 +1 votes

[VOTE] Accept Apache TVM into the incubator

2019-02-27 Thread Markus Weimer
Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the TVM project in [1]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki [2]. According to the Incubator rules[3] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new TVM project as a podling in the Apache Incubator. A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-27 Thread Hagay Lupesko
yay! so many goodies in this release, looking forward to see it out. Kudos to everyone who assisted in the release... On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:54 AM Piyush Ghai wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks everyone for spending the time to test and vote. > > This vote passes with 5 +1 votes (4 binding) and no

Re: Incubator release votes

2019-02-27 Thread Matt Sicker
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 07:43, David P Grove wrote: > > Or in the case of the current OpenWhisk podling voting thread [1], our only > mentor has already voted +1, but after a week we still need two more IPMC > votes to be able to proceed. > > Please help > As of sometime over the past day or

Mentor review of releases was: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

2019-02-27 Thread Craig Russell
I think this is a good opportunity for me to suggest: As part of mentorship, review of releases is a requirement. This vote passed in the podling with zero votes from mentors. There is no evidence that I could find in the podling vote thread that anyone actually reviewed the release artifacts.

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-27 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Thanks Markus! Will be ready for the help! 27 Şub 2019 Çar, saat 20:32 tarihinde Henry Saputra şunu yazdı: > Thanks, Marcus. Looking forward for the VOTE thread. > > This would be great addition to Apache Software Foundation. > > - Henry > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc3

2019-02-27 Thread Piyush Ghai
Hi all, Thanks everyone for spending the time to test and vote. This vote passes with 5 +1 votes (4 binding) and no 0 or -1 votes. +1 votes Henri Yandell / binding Jason Dai / binding Justin Mclean / binding Michael Wall / binding Sheng Zha 0 votes No votes -1 votes No votes I will move

Re: [Proposal] Apache TVM

2019-02-27 Thread Henry Saputra
Thanks, Marcus. Looking forward for the VOTE thread. This would be great addition to Apache Software Foundation. - Henry On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer wrote: > Thanks everyone for the discussion thus far. Based on it, I have uploaded > an updated proposal here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

2019-02-27 Thread Henry Saputra
Thanks, Jason. Will work with team to help follow up with the release artifacts On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:52 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Thanks a lot for pointing us to issues we have currently. > > If you need a hand with anything or have any questions just ask. > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Composer (incubating) 0.10.0

2019-02-27 Thread Dave Grove
The voting is closed and has passed with 3 +1, 1 +0, and no -1 votes. +1 Bertrand Delacretaz, Kevin McGrail, Justin McLean +0 Sheng Wu Justin noted that the end year in the notice file should be updated to 2019 in the next release; this has been fixed in master and will be correct in the next

Re: Request the right to create new proposal on incubator wiki

2019-02-27 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
I will grant it to you. Regards JB Le 27 févr. 2019 à 12:53, à 12:53, Liang Chen a écrit: >Hi > >I am new IPMC, helping a new project. Request the right to create new >proposal on incubator wiki >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals > >Thanks in advance. > >Regards >Liang > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates

2019-02-27 Thread Thomas Weise
I would consider it a mentor responsibility, just like any other advise on the way towards graduation. There could be explicit mention in the maturity assessment / checklist. -- sent from mobile On Tue, Feb 26, 2019, 11:33 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > But my proposal to move towards

Request the right to create new proposal on incubator wiki

2019-02-27 Thread Liang Chen
Hi I am new IPMC, helping a new project. Request the right to create new proposal on incubator wiki https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals Thanks in advance. Regards Liang -- Sent from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

2019-02-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Thanks a lot for pointing us to issues we have currently. If you need a hand with anything or have any questions just ask. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: Incubator release votes

2019-02-27 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Craig, replies inline, > Apologies if these comments cross other discussions. It's hard to keep > track of all the threads that have forked from the original discussion. I'm struggling to keep up too :-/ > This is really sad, because in most of these cases the mentors have not > voted.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DLab (incubating) 2.1

2019-02-27 Thread Bohdan Hliva
Hi, Thanks a lot for pointing us to issues we have currently. Will fix it asap. > On Feb 27, 2019, at 04:26, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry but I’m also -1 (binding) as there is a number of issues here, there’s > compiled code in the release, the LICENSE and NOTICE files need some

Re: Incubator release votes

2019-02-27 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> On the one side we have lengthy discussions about non-mentors from > resisting to interfere, but on the other hand podlings are begging for > such "interference". > Guess there are always two sides of the discussion. I politely disagree with you Chris. What I raised was that cold

Re: Welcome Wagon

2019-02-27 Thread Ciprian Borodescu
I would be super interested in these topics as we're also considering joining the Apache Incubator with MorphL Community Edition: https://github.com/Morphl-AI/MorphL-Community-Edition Big +1! On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:58 AM Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > An Incubator Welcome Wagon could be a

Re: Welcome Wagon

2019-02-27 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> An Incubator Welcome Wagon could be a Guide of Guides and include > introductory information about: > > (0) Onboarding > (1) Community Development > (2) Infrastructure and Builds > (3) Legal Policy > (4) Release Policy > (5) Press > (6) Foundation Structure +1 from me. I think also the

Re: Podlings Which Need Mentors

2019-02-27 Thread Javi Roman
>From a point of view of Myriad - 2 - Benjamin Hindman, Ted Dunning. I have to say, the only active mentor is Ted, unfortunately Benjamin is not active in this project. So we need more mentoring in order to unlock the rebooting of the project, in my opinion. Any help would be appreciated! -- Javi