Hi All,
+1 for #4
I think that we should focus on what is the underlying reason. I suggest
starting a new thread to point for such purpose. We need to address the
problem for both newcomers and long-standing members. For example, I
personally think that it is not fluid at some points how
Congratulations!
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:55 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Congrats to TVM community. Let's get to work
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:10 PM Tianqi Chen
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, everyone.
> > I will follow up by cross-posting in the TVM community as well as give
> > a
Hi,
> I think this thread misses the point of the original observation.
Several people has said the issue is that the IPMC is too big and you yourself
said how IPMC members join was an issue. This email was trying to address that.
Your response means I guess that you changed your mind?
> What
As framed herein, #4 for sure. (But, that doesn't necessarily exclude
support for various ideas that rework how IPMC operates, and where reducing
the size may be a small part of something larger and intentional.)
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:13 PM Ross Gardler wrote:
> I think this thread misses
I think this thread misses the point of the original observation.
Firstly, I've not seen anyone suggest that removing inactive IPMC members will
make any difference. What I've seen is a suggestion that active IPMC members on
general@ should be expected to be on the private list.
While there
Projects are free to set their own bylaws. As long as the community as a whole
agree to removal of inactive members then they can do that. Though merit does
not and should not expire.
It is my opinion, and the opinion of many others, that keeping busy work to a
minimum is important to the
Hello community,
We are pleased to announce that Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.1.0 is released!
Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can
ingest data in realtime and serve analytical queries at low latency.
The release can be downloaded at:
+1 for #4 noop, at least until there's evidence of a problem.
Kenn
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:27 PM Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:33 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC
> members think might be a way to
Woonsan
I think that there may be some cross-talk between discussions. This latest
discussion was about the Ipmc ,not about the podling PMCs.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:27 PM Woonsan Ko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:33 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It’s been suggested that
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:33 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC members
> think might be a way to address this?
>
> Please discuss and indicate +1 what you would think would help, you can vote
> for more than one.
>
> Some
Hi,
> Of course, we could consider to send mail to the IPMC members, who haven't
> subscribed the private ml, and ask them to do so.
That has already done several months ago - a few decided to set down and a few
decided to sign up, but not much changed.
Thanks,
Justin
+1 for #4
From I known, member of Incubator PMC is either already Apache Member or People
already are/were active and helpful for other incubator project.
Even they are not active today, removing them from IPMC could have negative
effects when they want to be back in some day.
Of course, we
I am not aware of the problem we are trying to fix. I don't even know if I
am a mentor not subscribed to private@.
Without knowing what we are trying to solve, it is hard to weigh in on
fixes.
So my ask is what is the issue?
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 19:25 Liang Chen Hi
>
> One more suggestion:
Hi
One more suggestion: How about maintaining one table, and ask IPMC to freely
provide info by them-self which part they are mentoring or will be going to
mentor as volunteer.
For example myself : Helping new project (DataSketches) to prepare
incubator proposal. and participate in some vote for
+1 for #4
I think IPMC members not subscribed to the private list is only an issue for
mentors.
So at the risk of adding "yet another rule", I'd vote for #4 and look into
*requiring* mentors to subscribe to the incubator private list and their mentee
podlings' private lists.
Craig
> On Mar
Hi -
I lean heavily towards #4.
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 3:33 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC members
> think might be a way to address this?
>
> Please discuss and indicate +1 what you would think would help, you can vote
I don't think that the number of inactive IPMC members is a factor in
anything. They are, by definition, inactive.
So I would vote for the no-op action (#4, I think).
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:39 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:33 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:33 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC members
> think might be a way to address this?
Personally, I believe that "IPMC is too large" argument is only applicable to
how quickly/easily consensus can be
Hi,
It’s been suggested that the IPMC is too large, what do other IPMC members
think might be a way to address this?
Please discuss and indicate +1 what you would think would help, you can vote
for more than one.
Some suggestions:
1. Ask all inactive IPMC if they want to continue being on the
Hi,
> not sure if you want us to edit typos etc. directly or whether you want
> them listed here?
Feel free to edit on the wiki.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
Hi Justin,
not sure if you want us to edit typos etc. directly or whether you want
them listed here?
Cheers,
Lars
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:06 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I'm yet to fill in some of the mechanical items (releases and the
> like) some feedback on the report would be
Hi,
A few days to go but currently we are missing signoff on these reports:
- Crail
- Druid
- Marvin-AI
- Myriad
- OpenWhisk
- Pinot
- Pony Mail
- Singa
- Tamaya
Congratulation to Omid, Tephra and Training for having all mentors sign off the
report.
Four codlings failed to report and will be
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 15:54, Minxuan Zhuang wrote:
>
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> The Apache Dubbo(incubating) team is pleased to announce that the
> 2.6.6 has just been released.
>
What is the project about? Why should I be interested in it?
[rhetorical questions]
Announce emails are sent
Hi,
While I'm yet to fill in some of the mechanical items (releases and the like)
some feedback on the report would be appreciated. [1]
Just keep in mind that it covers what happened in February and doesn’t need to
include the most recent events as those go in the next report.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> Yes, we should start recommending your approach.
I think the IPMC need to decide as a whole on that first. Perhaps call a vote?
> I am actually for this as normal course and instituting the “pTLP” as the new
> normal as it is actually makes the PPMC more like a TLP from the start.
And
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Fisher updated INCUBATOR-231:
---
Attachment: gitbox.svn.diff.txt
gitbox.clutch.data.txt
> Cleanup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16787155#comment-16787155
]
David Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
I have an svn update for clutch.py and
Hi All
I’m helping to manage the Community track for ApacheCon NA in Las Vegas
http://www.apachecon.com/acna19/index.html
and would like to know what people think about including Incubator as part of
the Community track. I know that some incubating projects might be included as
part of the
Thank you for everyone who participated to the vote. The voting is now
closed and it has passed with 3 +1 (binding), and no 0 or -1 votes.
Binding:
+1 Felix Cheung
+1 Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
+1 Olivier Lamy
Voting thread:
Congrats to TVM community. Let's get to work
- Henry
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 5:10 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> Thank you, everyone.
> I will follow up by cross-posting in the TVM community as well as give
> a public roadmap regarding next steps together with the help from our
> mentors. I am
Hi Myrle,
Yes, we should start recommending your approach. I am actually for this as
normal course and instituting the “pTLP” as the new normal as it is actually
makes the PPMC more like a TLP from the start.
Given our current interpretation of rules that An Official Apache Release
requires 3
Hello Incubator Community,
The Apache Dubbo(incubating) team is pleased to announce that the
2.6.6 has just been released.
Both the source release[1] and the maven binary release[2] are available
now, you can also find the detailed release notes in here[3].
If you have any usage questions, or
Hi community,
72 hours has passed, the vote has passed with 3 +1 binding votes and
no -1 binding vote.
+1 binding:
* Mohammad Asif Siddiqui
* Mark Thomas
* Sheng Wu
I will proceed to publish the artifacts.
Thanks for everyone who voted!
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:18 PM 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi
Hi
Strange thing. I noticed my +1 binding mail didn't arrive the ML, but I do send.
Anyway, here is My +1 binding
- asc checked
- sha512 checked
- incubating in name
- maven compile passed
- notice and license exist
--
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:30 AM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>...
> Not quite sure which rules should be applied.
>
The Incubator rules, clearly.
The "maturity model" is simply a web page produced by ComDev. It has zero
application to the Incubator, or to the Foundation.
Regards,
-g
Hi all,
we’re currently working on some pre-graduation work and stumbled over something:
In the Apache Maturity Model [1] is says that:
CS40 - In Apache projects, vetoes are only valid for code commits and are
justified by a technical explanation, as per the Apache voting rules defined in
Hi Justin
I have read the discussion. Make sense to me.
Thanks.
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
From Wu Sheng 's phone.
-- Original --
From: Justin Mclean
Date: Thu,Mar 7,2019 7:00 PM
To: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache
Hi,
> Could you clear why don't you include the whole netty's NOTICE file?
> Do I miss something?
Only parts of the NOTICE file that are relevant need to be included, some
projects find analysis of that difficult and include the whole file to be on
the safe side, some with only small parts of
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:09 PM 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> From my understanding, there is a possible issue in your source release and
> bin.
>
>
> I found a very simple NOTICE
I think keeping a NOTICE simple is not an issue.
In the ASF documentation[1], it says:
It is important to
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:07 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> a) Asking PMC members if they want to step down from the PMC if they
> seem to be inactive for a long time
>
> b) Forcibly removing PMC members that the PMC considers inactive
>
> IMO a) is fine if a PMC
Hi
Thanks for clear that, you have discussed this before.
My +1 binding
- asc checked
- sha512 checked
- incubating in name
- maven compile passed
- notice and license exist
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin
From Wu Sheng 's phone.
-- Original
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:41 PM Ted Dunning wrote:
> ...inactive PMC members are not a problem
> (Apache culture is heavily designed to make this work) and they could be an
> asset in the future. So removing the inactive members is actually a slight
> negative to the project...
I think it's
Hi,
there is a discuss about the NOTICE file here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9c26cb1750bc72c5cc3fd6ff1620721f4160ec20250c9328fb102e11@%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E
,
I think it's fine not to include the whole netty NOTICE file.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:09 PM 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi
Hi
From my understanding, there is a possible issue in your source release and bin.
I found a very simple NOTICE
--
Apache Dubbo (incubating)
Copyright 2018-2019 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software
44 matches
Mail list logo
