[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788396#comment-16788396
]
Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-231:
[~wave] AIUI the entry in the DTD means that the valu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788384#comment-16788384
]
Justin Mclean commented on INCUBATOR-231:
-
I need to edit the file every month
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788383#comment-16788383
]
David Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
[~s...@apache.org] Which whimsy job?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788371#comment-16788371
]
Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-231:
One of the Whimsy jobs that creates the public JSON f
It’s actually a 1. No worries.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 8, 2019, at 3:00 PM, sebb AT ASF wrote:
>
> I 'fixed' the file because it was causing Whimsy errors.
>
> I may have got the group wrong, but I'm sure it's only supposed to be
> a single digit.
>
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 22:57, wrote:
I 'fixed' the file because it was causing Whimsy errors.
I may have got the group wrong, but I'm sure it's only supposed to be
a single digit.
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 22:57, wrote:
>
> Author: sebb
> Date: Fri Mar 8 22:57:57 2019
> New Revision: 1855068
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1
Hi -
> IPMC membership has nothing to do with mentor engagement.
>
> If you are trying to diagnose mentorship, then you need to start over with
> a mentorship discussion. If mentors participating at the IPMC don't
> correlate to their mentor engagement with their podlings, that's something
> to
Just to point out the obvious...
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:33 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
> Some suggestions:
> 1. Ask all inactive IPMC if they want to continue being on the IPMC and
> see who steps down. Being inactive they are probably not following this
> list so we need to identify and send ea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788249#comment-16788249
]
David Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
Interesting event just now as someone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788005#comment-16788005
]
David Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
I may decide to move this work to new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16787985#comment-16787985
]
David Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231:
We could, but it will need to be more
Hi Ted,
Maybe I missed somethings totally, but I intended to express my
preference about restructuring of IPMC, not PPMCs:
- Keep only people as IPMC members who can really guide, recruit and
review graduations based on their merits shown in the past in this
specific community;
- Keep active mento
Hi all,
carrying over my vote from the plc4x dev list.
+1
Chris
Am 08.03.19, 13:02 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Hello all,
This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1.
The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to rel
Hello all,
This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1.
The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1.
We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
incubator release.
A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16787734#comment-16787734
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-231:
---
Could we include some f
+1 option #4.
Based on Justin's fact-finding, these "extra" IPMC members are not the
source of the IPMC's problem. Let's put the conversation about removing
IPMC members to bed so that we can focus on more promising causes and cures.
Best,
Myrle
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:33 AM Justin Mclean
wr
I feel the real issue may be not the number of inactive IPMCs, but the
number of active IPMCs. It might be helpful to make sure each project has
enough active IPMCs.
>From this point of view, the issue with many inactive IPMCs is that it
seems like a project has enough IPMCs so there is no urgent
17 matches
Mail list logo
