Hi,
> While you've been going through the history and other docs: Does it actually
> say somewhere that a true ASF release MUST NOT contain any non-compliance of
> policy?
Again I’m not sure why you’re talking about TLP policy on the incubator general
list. But VP legal said as much the
While you've been going through the history and other docs: Does it actually
say somewhere that a true ASF release MUST NOT contain any non-compliance of
policy? Or is it possible that the communities must fix some non-compliance
issues right away and can fix others later? Then it isn't
Hi Everyone,
The VOTE to (Re)Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) 1.0.0 has closed.
The RESULT is:
[9] +1, let’s get it released!!
Joshua Poore
Rob Foley
Laura Mariano
Michelle Beard (voted in private@)
Michael Schrieber
Arthi Vezhavendan
Dave Meikle*
Justin McLean*
Jan Piotrowski*
Hi,
> The Incubator itself is a PMC.
OK that's sorted.
> Now let's talk about podling releases... When the IPMC votes on accepting a
> podling release, and it passes, my opinion is that the Incubator takes on the
> resultant legal obligations associated w/ any PMC doing a release. Now the
>
Antoine -
Thank you for your work getting the initial release done and patience here.
As Dave said, we have our 3 +1's.
thanks,
--larry
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 6:15 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:29 PM Craig Russell
> wrote:
> >...
>
> > No. Smiley face doesn't count.
> >
Hi,
> Only because IPMC said it must provide such votes.
Can you provide a reference to that? I realise that may be hard to do so given
it was so long ago.
I searched and was unable to find where that happened in the the list history.
The earliest reference I could find was this [1] (in
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:24 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 7:57 AM Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:13 AM Justin Mclean >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > b) It listed as a TLP in Whimsy
> >
> > Whimsy is not canonical. Its label means absolutely nothing. Board
> >
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:29 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>...
> No. Smiley face doesn't count.
>
Apparently you missed the point when Justin did that to me. Hmm?
Of course it doesn't count. Why don't you go police th VP Incubator, okay?
-g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lee Rhodes closed INCUBATOR-240.
Resolution: Fixed
Wrong target, should have been INFRA. (my mistake)
> Setup initial redirect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16874525#comment-16874525
]
Lee Rhodes commented on INCUBATOR-240:
--
Sorry, I thought I was setting it up as an INFRA issue.
Hi Greg,
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 1:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> Maybe I should say you're being an ass about the whole process. :-)
No. Smiley face doesn't count.
Stop.
Craig
>
> -g
Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 7:57 AM Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:13 AM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
> > > b) It listed as a TLP in Whimsy
>
> Whimsy is not canonical. Its label means absolutely nothing. Board
> decisions are canonical.
The canonical source is:
You have your 3 +1 Votes!
We can discuss messaging on dev@tuweni
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 2:04 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this
> vote as passing.
>
>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27,
I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this vote
as passing.
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The
My +1 to the 2nd camp. For me it's about transparency.
I don't see an issue if a podling release has some significant flaws. For
me, the ideal would be if it is easy for podling members, reviewers, and
downstream users to easily determine whether such flaws are known and what
they are. It can be
The Apache Druid team is proud to announce the release of Apache Druid
(incubating) 0.15.0.
Apache Druid 0.15.0-incubating contains over 250 new features,
performance/stability/documentation improvements, and bug fixes from 39
contributors. Major new features and improvements include:
- New Data
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16874279#comment-16874279
]
Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-240:
---
Lee, This should be an INFRA JIRA issue. Also, there
Lee Rhodes created INCUBATOR-240:
Summary: Setup initial redirect landing page at
datasketches.apache.org
Key: INCUBATOR-240
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-240
Project:
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/24/19, 9:12 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
>> What kinds of policy violations truly affect the legal shield if the
>> non-compliance:
>
>You're asking the wrong question. You're still asking the TLP question.
>
> I'm
Thanks, Jan.
We’ll make good on comment, and have been watching issues IPMC has been raising
with other podlings. We’ve integrated a lot of into our next release.
Joshua Poore
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Jan Piotrowski wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I trust Justin's judgement here, and I'm sure
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:13 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Which would be a reasonable assumption give:
> > a) That only IPMC votes are binding on releases.
>
Only because IPMC said it must provide such votes. I maintain it does not
have to. The Board gave the Incubator the range/duty
+1
I trust Justin's judgement here, and I'm sure you'll work out any
issues with further releases.
-J
Am Do., 27. Juni 2019 um 06:14 Uhr schrieb Joshua Poore
:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Another friendly reminder: please VOTE on the ReRelease of Apache Flagon
> UserAle.js (Incubating) 1.0.0.
>
> Our
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I see a lot of "oh no. a bad file". What is the takeaway from that? "The
> > IPMC thinks we should not release.”
>
> Has anyone voted -1? Nope. And even if they did a -1 vote is not a veto.
>
Great. Semantics. "But I didn't
23 matches
Mail list logo
