[GitHub] [incubator] justinmclean opened a new pull request #28: fix link

2019-08-10 Thread GitBox
justinmclean opened a new pull request #28: fix link URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/28 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

[GitHub] [incubator] justinmclean merged pull request #28: fix link

2019-08-10 Thread GitBox
justinmclean merged pull request #28: fix link URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/28 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > But, assuming that each podling has three active mentors, each podling should > have 3 +1 IPMC vote before the RC goes to general@ and then is, as Sebb says > below basically a "lazy" consensus vote as 3 +1 are present and if no one > throws in a -1 it will pass regularly and is a

[GitHub] [incubator] justinmclean merged pull request #27: Add some links to some other Apache Way / incubator talks

2019-08-10 Thread GitBox
justinmclean merged pull request #27: Add some links to some other Apache Way / incubator talks URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/27 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [incubator] justinmclean opened a new pull request #27: Add some links to some other Apache Way / incubator talks

2019-08-10 Thread GitBox
justinmclean opened a new pull request #27: Add some links to some other Apache Way / incubator talks URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/27 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Option (F): stop calling them official ASF releases, which means PMC votes > are not required. In that case voting would not be required and they wouldn’t have to follow ASF policy. If they are not official releases then we probably can’t release or distribute them on ASF infrastructure.

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-10 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:13 AM Mingshen Sun wrote: > > > > == Continuous Integration Service == > > > > > > MesaTEE currently uses self-hosted continuous integration (CI) service > > > which can > > > help developers to automatically test commits. The CI service involves > > > several > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-10 Thread Matt Sicker
I’d most likely be interested in mentoring this project, but I’m not that experienced in incubator mentorship. If we have another more experienced mentor to work with us, I’d be happy to mentor as well. On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 04:13, Mingshen Sun wrote: > Thanks Justin, regarding to your

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread Greg Stein
Option (F): stop calling them official ASF releases, which means PMC votes are not required. On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:04 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > One of the incubator pain points is the double voting on releases first by > the podling and then by the IPMC. > > Historically there been

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > If the IPMC members have +1ed the vote on the dev list, won't these > votes count if the vote is continued on the general@ list? Yep they count. > Do they really have to re-affirm their votes? It’s good if they do but not a requirement, it’s best of the email contains how many IPMC

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Another variation/option for those using the WIP disclaimer might be that > since the WIP disclaimer kind of says this release doesn't have "full > official" status from an ASF point of view then one way of thinking about > it is that perhaps full official IPMC endorsement is less of a

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, thanks Justin for bringing that up. I have perhaps a different perspective than many others because I was / am mostly active in several podlings and just very recently became IPMC member (no apache member). But, assuming that each podling has three active mentors, each podling should have

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread sebb
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 12:45, Paul King wrote: > > Another variation/option for those using the WIP disclaimer might be that > since the WIP disclaimer kind of says this release doesn't have "full > official" status from an ASF point of view then one way of thinking about > it is that perhaps

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

2019-08-10 Thread Paul King
Another variation/option for those using the WIP disclaimer might be that since the WIP disclaimer kind of says this release doesn't have "full official" status from an ASF point of view then one way of thinking about it is that perhaps full official IPMC endorsement is less of a requirement so

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-10 Thread Mingshen Sun
Thanks Justin, regarding to your questions: On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 2:46 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the proposal, it sound like a really interesting project. > > > == Core Developers == > > > > Current core developers work at Baidu. We are confident that incubation will > >