Hi all,
The Apache Hivemall community has approved a proposal to release
Apache Hivemall v0.6.0 by v0.6.0-rc1.
We kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator release candidate.
The PPMC vote thread is located here:
The initial five works for me. I see no reason to add more at this time. It
would only be a block for graduation, not inception.
To rephrase: some may have an issue with five, but I bet you'll get enough
+1 votes as-is.
Cheers,
-g
On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 6:39 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> I think
Hi,
I would add everyone who has made significant contributions to the project
as initial committers (if they want to be added). Look at the mailing list
and the PRs and see who have made this contributions.
IMO the commiters added during incubation should be new people to the
project not
I think it just because that it will spend more time...
So what is the suggested initial committer number for NuttX? We can try to
get even more but is this necessary? The plan is to expand the committers
quickly during the incubation time, follow the Apache way, and also the
IPMCs can observe
I am in as much as my time permits
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Duo Zhang
Sent: den 2 december 2019 00:45
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] NuttX Proposal
The proposal on the wiki page has already listed five initial committers.
And I think we can let the
Hi,
Given I assume there are other contributors why not make them initial
commitors?
Thanks,
Justin
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019, 10:45 Duo Zhang, wrote:
> The proposal on the wiki page has already listed five initial committers.
>
> And I think we can let the initial committers reply here to confirm
The proposal on the wiki page has already listed five initial committers.
And I think we can let the initial committers reply here to confirm that
they will be active, at least in the early time in the incubator, before we
elect new PPMC members.
Does this solve your concerns? Thanks Dave.
Dave
Hi Greg :-)
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:05 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> >> I imagine that it will take a month or two to get the GitHub
> repositories ready for prime time.
> > The physical transfer shouldn’t take that long, fixing up all the
> headers and licenses may take longer but that’s OK
On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 11:38 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>...
> It would help if the initial committer list was greater than the bare
> minimum of three. Three PPMC members is not enough. There needs to be at
> least five committers to start.
>
Read the thread in its entirety, please. It has already
Dear community,
This is a call for vote to release Apache TVM (incubating) version
0.6.0. We are thrilled to have a lot of exciting features be added
since v0.5 early this year.
Apache TVM (incubating) community has voted and approved the release,
with two +1 votes from IPMC members (Tianqi Chen
I share Ted’s concerns.
It would help if the initial committer list was greater than the bare minimum
of three. Three PPMC members is not enough. There needs to be at least five
committers to start.
(Should there be an explicit minimum in the proposal template?)
It’s often the case that some
I doubt that the name is the crucial issue. I would see that have a
substantial group of initial committers who are active in setting up there
project would be the crucial step. That doesn't have to happen before
incubation.
As a thought experiment, if Greg could go on a disconnected vacation
I think donating the project to ASF already means Greg will give up
controlling the project by his own, otherwise he could just keep the
project in the current state.
And IMO, the name 'NuttX' is a kudos to Gregory Nutt, who has been
developing and maintaining the project for 15 years. No matter
13 matches
Mail list logo
