On Dec 31, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept DataFu as a
new Incubator project.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DataFuProposal, and is also included
below.
Vote is
FYI, if you're signing up using this email address then maybe that's the
problem. You should register this email address at
https://id.apache.org
otherwise your request looks like it's from an unauthorized email.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 19, 2013, at 8:29 PM, Jukka Zitting
Sorry, that was meant to be directed to Raphael.
On Dec 20, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
FYI, if you're signing up using this email address then maybe that's the
problem. You should register this email address at
https://id.apache.org
otherwise your
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
[] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incubator
[] +0 Don't care whether or which
[] -1 Do not accept Phoenix into the Incubator because...
On Nov 10, 2013, at 1:04 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
How about simply changing the rules for Incubator releases so that
they don't require at least three binding votes, but instead make it
at least three votes only one of which must be binding. That would
mean there would still
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Twill into the Incubator
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 4, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Jakob Frank ja...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] -1 Reject graduation of the Marmotta podling from Incubator because...
Thanks
On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologize for the delay @MRQL guys. Just casted my +1 binding VOTE.
Congrats!
- Henry
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hello,
It has been 16 days since we
On Oct 14, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache MRQL 0.9.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
+1
Thanks for being so patient!
Regards,
Alan
72 hour is not a maximum requirement, it's a minimum requirement. So, you can
keep it open.
With that said, I'm sorry that you don't have any binding votes yet. I should
be able to look at this sometime tomorrow.
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 16, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Leonidas Fegaras
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 2, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Retire the Tashi podling
[ ] +0 Neither here nor there
[ ] -1 Do not retire the podling because ...
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Yay! Congrats.
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:26 PM, Eric Yang eric...@gmail.com wrote:
Graduation community vote passed with 7 +1 from , which from those 6
are binding :
Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Ant Elder
Christian Grobmeier
Jukka Zitting
Luciano Resende
Alan D. Cabrera
On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Dave Lester d...@ischool.berkeley.edu wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Aurora into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept Aurora because...
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe,
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 20, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Eric Yang ey...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] +1 Graduate Chukwa podling from Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to graduation status of Chukwa
[ ] -1 Reject graduation of Chukwa podling from Incubator because ...
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting cutt...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Storm into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept Storm because...
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
Congrats!
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 5, 2013, at 5:54 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi Folks,
The IPMC has VOTEd to add Jake Farrell as an Apache Incubator PMC.
Welcome Jake!
--David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Are we voting?
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 4, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 binding
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.comwrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Sent from phone
On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Nathan Marz nat...@nathanmarz.com
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 28, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Jordan Zimmerman jor...@jordanzimmerman.com
wrote:
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 Graduate the Apache Curator podling from Apache Incubator as a TLP
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the graduation status of Apache Curator podling
[ ] -1 Reject graduation
On Aug 5, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan shreepa...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Following the discussions last week, I'm calling a vote to accept Sentry as
a new project in the Apache Incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SentryProposal and is
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 6, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Juan Pablo Santos RodrÃguez juanpa...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache JSPWiki podling is a project which holds a feature-rich and
extensible WikiWiki engine, built around the standard Java EE components
Java, Servlets, and Java
On May 27, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
...Half the committers are ASF
members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach
Sebb anything new about doing
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 20, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Srikanth Sundarrajan
srikanth.sundarra...@inmobi.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on Falcon
(formerly Ivory). I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Apache
Falcon into the Incubator. I'll let the vote run
Should we declare lazy consensus?
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Dec 22, 2012, at 9:09 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Alan Cabrera wrote:
For your comments
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RetiringPodlingsProposed
I basically
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 14, 2012, at 8:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Kitty community has voted to retire the project. I'm now moving the
retirement vote to the Incubator PMC.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 to retire the Kitty project
[ ] 0 for Don't care
[ ] -1 for No, please
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Oct 3, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
Hello,
Kafka Incubator has passed the vote for 0.7.2 RC5
http://www.mail-archive.com/kafka-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg04980.html
I would like to call a vote now from the IPMC.
This is the fifth candidate for the
Odd, I don't recall receiving a reminder from that automaton.
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 24, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Podling reports for October are due next week on Wednesday (October
3rd), and the wiki page [1] is now ready to be filled in.
When preparing your reports,
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 5, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Fabian Christ wrote:
the Stanbol podling has discussed [1] that we are ready for
graduation. The project has created two releases during incubation and
created an active community around the topic of semantic content
management. The PPMC
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 4, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote:
Hi,
The AWF community has voted to retire the project.
Following the retirement guide [1], I now call the Incubator PMC to vote on
confirming this decision. (Will be open for 72 hours).
[ ] +1 Retire
On Jul 3, 2012, at 5:40 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jul 1, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
I don't see any particular cause
On Jul 2, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Jul 2, 2012 12:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...
I hope that someone can help me understand the current thinking about the
vibrant community aspect that seems to be a requirement for incubation/TLP
admission
On Jul 1, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Let me try this again.
Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
I don't see any particular cause for concern. It's one of our podlings that
is all set except for not having added committers. Mentors, do you
On Jun 30, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For those not following board@, the board is proposing the creation
of a new TLP (tentatively called Apache Steve) which will serve as
the project behind our STV and voting tools.
The impetus behind this was when I suggested to the
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Based on the status of this podling as reported in the June board
report, I propose that the IPMC retire the Kato podling.
I'm not sure how long a vote for this should remain open.
here is my +1.
As you can see, they are all Apache compatible licenses.
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
Alan-
Please recheck your results using the 0.7.0 release and not your email
archives
On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
Obeying dependency license provisions is not an ASF
/snappy-java-1.0.4.1.jar
Snappy is on Apache License 2.0. So, our licenses should be covered.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
It's the PPMC's job to vet these dependencies, not the mentors. I already
did this once after no one
due to jar
upgrades (are you referring to those?). Could you list any other completely
new jars that are not included in 0,7.0 already?
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
On Jun 22, 2012, at 10:19 AM, Jakob Homan wrote
or now?
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
This is why documenting transitive dependencies is so dangerous. The set
of jars that I got last year is much different. This list from last year
is what was voted upon. You need
On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
Alan-
Please recheck your results using the 0.7.0 release and not your email
archives to make sure your process is consistent. Please also let us
know how you're composing your list so your concerns are reproducible.
We can't be chasing
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 21, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
Hi,
We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and would
like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 hours has
passed since the initial proposal.
The proposal may
On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 19, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
Kevin,
Thanks for the comments. Just want to clarify on your points on
LICENSE
at 10:36 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
Hello,
This is the third candidate for the second incubator release for Apache
Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
This release fixes the following issues
http://people.apache.org
On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I think Alan's (Kafka's) position is that dependencies don't matter since
they are not distributing binary artifacts.
Dependencies do matter and they need to be checked. IMO, that point is
non-negotiable.
The point that I'm trying to
On Jun 21, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
So, attempting to clarify:
I think Alan's (Kafka's) position is that dependencies don't matter since
they are not distributing binary artifacts.
I would agree with Alan, if Kafka source was simply intended to be used in
source form.
.
Thanks,
Jun
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
With that said, I
On Jun 21, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
Obeying dependency license provisions is not an ASF policy, it's a legal
requirement. Fairness is immaterial.
If you bundle the bits, you must deal with the
On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:27 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
At some point, though, IPMC members either need to start voting -1 on any
incubating RC that has a jar file in it, or someone needs to formally answer
Roy's argument and explain how binary files can be considered open source
when they
. Not sure if that will be a problem.
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 21, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Not sure. It's simple enough to check the email archives for my last plea.
With that said, I was hoping we could kill two birds with one stone.
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 21, 2012
On Jun 19, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
Kevin,
Thanks for the comments. Just want to clarify on your points on
LICENSE/NOTICE. Our LICENSE/NOTICE covers all jars included in the source,
not those pulled in during building. We had a
On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
Hello,
This is the third candidate for the second incubator release for Apache
Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
This release fixes the following issues
http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-3/RELEASE-NOTES.html
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 11, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Josh Thompson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
IPMC members,
Given the positive feedback from Jukka Zitting and no negative feedback, I'd
like to request a vote for the graduation of VCL as a TLP to be proposed to
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 5, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator.
Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine
new committers and made two signifiant releases following the ASF
+1
Regards,
Alan
On May 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Apache Crunch for
incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and
-kafka-private
+kafka-dev
+general
Ahh, account was only created. According to root:
Only PMC chairs can grant karma. If needed, please post to the general@/
dev@/private@ list of your project asking for someone with sufficient
karma to grant access to 'jjkoshy'.
Sorry about this
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On May 3, 2012, at 1:12 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Hi,
As discussed earlier the Zeta components community has voted
to retire the project. Following the retirement guide [1], I now call
the Incubator PMC to vote on confirming this decision. This vote is
open
On May 2, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and
giving constructive feedback where needed, I'd like to propose
something like the shepherd model the ASF board is using for project
reports. For each report a single
On May 5, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On May 2, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
In order to better share the effort of reviewing podling reports and
giving constructive feedback where
On May 5, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
If you don't want to be a Shepherd, don't sign up.
Yeah, I get that part.
The board asked us
to do a better job of reviewing reports and detecting mentor
deficiencies.
I get that too.
This is a plan to accomplish that.
My opinion
by Alex a
fresh eye, who can poke around and ask questions or even provide more help.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
On May 5, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
If you don't want to be a Shepherd, don't sign up.
Yeah, I get that part
On May 3, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
OK, so let's see how this works out in practice. We have 19 podling
reports to review by next Wednesday (Ambari is still empty).
To keep the required effort down to a reasonable level, I divided
these to six slots of three reports
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 9, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
+0: don't
+1 binding
Congrats!
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 2, 2012, at 2:10 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
[ ] +1 Recommend to the ASF Board that Apache Jena Proposal
is ready to graduate to being a top level project.
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not graduate Apache Jena because ...
+1 you know you're going in the right direction if it means less process
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 26, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Currently new podlings have most of their infrastructure (lists, web
site, svn, etc.) set up under incubator.apache.org and
repos/asf/incubator.
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
[ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below)
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling
--
-
To
Don't forget :)
Chris Mattmann
Benson Margulies
Alan Cabrera
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 11, 2012, at 7:55 PM, Billie J Rinaldi wrote:
This vote passes with 6 +1 IPMC votes.
+1 Jukka Zitting
+1 Leo Simons
+1 Mark Struberg
+1 Ant Elder
+1 Joe Schaefer
+1 Craig Russell
Thanks for
On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
Cloudera's compatibility issues are not our problem. These packages need to
go.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM
On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:53 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 27, 2012, at 4:26 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011.
Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC
members, and shows a steady
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 26, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
See [2]
On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
We should also give Arvind and the rest of the Sqoop community some
indication how to proceed, given the voting period is completed.
A concern has been raised by IPMC members and an effort is being made to
garner consensus. The voting
+1 binding
(It's President's weekend here in the US. It may be a good idea to keep this
vote open until EOD Tuesday)
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 18, 2012, at 9:31 PM, Peter Karman wrote:
The Apache Lucy community has voted[0] to graduate. We now ask that the IPMC
vote on recommending this
Can someone help me understand this error:
http://pastie.org/3409741
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
Hi all,
We'd like to ask your approval to release the Hama RC5 as Apache Hama
0.4.0-incubating.
This RC5 has passed the Hama PMC votes:
Please add joestein to the Kafka SVN group. Thanks!
Regards,
Alan
Preferred userid: joestein
Full name: Joe Stein
Forwarding email address: crypt...@gmail.com
Vote reference:
/authorization] mattmann%
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 16, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Please add joestein to the Kafka SVN group. Thanks!
Regards,
Alan
Preferred userid: joestein
Full name: Joe Stein
Forwarding email address: crypt...@gmail.com
Vote reference:
https://mail
On Feb 2, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
We have discussed many things the past days, I think we need to get
towards some results. Imho it was enough time to propose new incubator
chair candidates. So far we have nominations for Noel, Benson and
Chris M.
Should we do the
Done. Thanks for catching this!
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 29, 2012, at 9:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Not sure that I understand your statement. The site was updated, no?
This page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
is generated from site-author
On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
VCL
What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
Brain freeze on my part. What issue are you speaking of?
How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
It's improving. A new committer was added a few weeks
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
votes
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
This is getting sillier by the moment...
I don't care for these kinds of statements. Please try to keep the
conversation civil.
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of
this discussion thread. This should be about Regular (re)election of the PMC
Chair. Regular rotation IMO would be unwise and undesirable.
Good point. I share the
On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/29/2012 12:11 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I intend to nominate Noel J. Bergman but would like to see the community
come to a consensus about the rotation of the chair. (Dibs on Noel) :)
If this goes to a nominations
When did you resign?
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 27, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This belongs on general@ ...
A call for nominations for Incubator PMC Chair was started on the private@
list. The nomination process should be open to the Incubator community.
--- Noel
There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair
on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted this
policy and are quite happy with it. It's also my understanding that some in
this community think it would be a good idea to do it here.
On Jan 27, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This belongs on general@ ...
A call for nominations for Incubator PMC Chair was started on the private@
list. The nomination process should be open to the Incubator community.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
Sent:
It's my understanding that the group and artifact id do not include the token
incubating or incubator but that -incubating is suffixed to the version
number.
Do I understand the requirements correctly?
Regards,
Alan
-
To
, Alan D. Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:27 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
Hi,
This is the ninth candidate for the first incubator release for Apache
Kafka, version 0.7.0-incubating. We got some more feedback from
general@ regarding adding SBT
On Dec 19, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included
below for your convenience.
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Accept Bloodhound for incubation
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't accept Bloodhound for incubation (please explain)
The
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 4, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
Hello,
Please vote on the acceptance of DeltaSpike into the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and its content is also included below for
your convenience.
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Accept
+1 Sorry about the tardy check.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 8, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Eric Newton wrote:
If at first you don't succeed... hopefully this candidate passes all the
hurdles.
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Accumulo
(incubating) version 1.3.5. This will be
I agree. Kafka has left the three month monthly reporting window.
Regards,
Alan
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
I think we should ignore this since Kafka is now on the Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct
schedule according to the following wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 29, 2011, at 6:24 AM, Eric Newton wrote:
This is the first incubator release for Apache Accumulo, with the artifacts
versioned as 1.3.5-incubating.
VOTE:
http://www.mail-archive.com/accumulo-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg00939.html
RESULT:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 11:21 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/28/2011 1:00 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it gets a single -1
+1 binding
On Nov 24, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Empire-db podling joined the incubator in July 2008. Since then it has
made 6 releases following Apache guidelines, added 3 new committers,
and added 1 new PPMC member. The community is healthy and
On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file
based on recent traffic here.
LOL
Unfortunately, that conversation left me
with a giant
On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
Alan,
It's unfortunate that the vote only took 24 hours on the Kafka list; it
was my understanding that votes
101 - 200 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
