Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

n > > > On Sep 5, 2017 6:31 PM, "Bruce Snyder" <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Now we must wait for the IPMC next steps to make its recommendation to > the > > board. > > > > Bruce > > > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:05 AM, Von

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

gt; 4 +1 (binding) votes: > * John D Ament > * Bruce Snyder > * Willem Jiang > * Justin Mclean > > 11 +1 (non-binding) votes: > * Von Gosling > * Xin Wang > * Huxing Zhang > * Kevin Ratnasekera > * lollipop > * liuxue > * John Fang > * Dia Lin > * yukon >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache RocketMQ from podling to TLP

on holding such office to serve at the > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache RocketMQ > Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache RocketMQ > Project; and be it further > RES

Re: Archives for project private lists

Doh! Thank you, Daniel. Bruce On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 03/03/2017 05:32 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Where can I find the archives for project private lists nowadays? Things > > seem to have changed a bit regarding archi

Archives for project private lists

Where can I find the archives for project private lists nowadays? Things seem to have changed a bit regarding archives, so I have looked in the mod_mbox archives (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/) and in the Pony Mail archives (https://lists.apache.org/) but I am unable to locate any

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache RocketMQ 4.0.0(incubating) (RC3)

+1 (binding) No showstopper issues found, only minor issues that will be ironed out in subsequent releases (e.g., README needs some cleanup, need consistency in artifact naming). Bruce On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:46 PM, yukon wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

derstand the difference between binding and > non-binding votes. Binding status on any *@*(.)incubator.apache.org list > is limited to IPMC members. The only thing truly deferred down to the > podling completely is new committers and PPMC members. > > John > > > > > > > thanks &g

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

Hi John, I relied on the binding count based on people stating that their vote is binding. Is this incorrect? Bruce On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:45 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Bruce > > Please double check your binding list. > > On Nov 21, 2016 12:24,

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Incubator

The vote passes with 38 +1 votes (5 binding) and no -1 votes. Below are the results: Jochen Wiedmann +1 (binding) Rob Davies +1 Bertrand Delacretaz +1 John D. Ament +1 Myrle Krantz +1 Debo Dutta +1 Amol Kekre +1 Leif Hedstrom +1 P. Taylor Goetz +1 Stian Soiland-Reyes +1 Willem Jiang +1 (binding)

[VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

​ == Sponsors == === Champion === Bruce Snyder bsny...@apache.org === Nominated Mentors === * Justin McLean jmcl...@apache.org * Bruce Snyder bsny...@apache.org * Brian McCallister bri...@apache.org * Willem Ning Jiang ningji...@apache.org * Luke Han luke...@apache.org === Sponsoring Entity === We

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Justin, I have added your name to the proposal. Bruce On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the > project is willing to have me that is :-) > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

ian McCallister <bri...@skife.org> > > wrote: > > > +1 ! > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Cool. > > >> > > >> +1 > > >> > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

t; with what I see on GitHub. What am I missing? > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Brian McCallister <bri...@skife.org> > wrote: > > +1 ! > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > &

[DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

: Yeahmobi * Wei Zhou: Alibaba ​ == Sponsors == === Champion === Bruce Snyder bsny...@apache.org === Nominated Mentors === * Bruce Snyder bsny...@apache.org * Brian McCallister bri...@apache.org * Willem Ning Jiang ningji...@apache.org * Luke Han luke...@apache.org === Sponsoring Entity === We

Re: Request to be added to ContributorsGroup on MoinMoin wiki

Perfect, thanks John. Bruce On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Sorry Bruce, just got to it now. You should have access. > > John > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:54 AM Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> > wrote: > &g

Re: Request to be added to ContributorsGroup on MoinMoin wiki

Hi John, Did you add me to the ContributorsGroup yet? I'm still seeing the following page as ImmutablePage: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RocketMQProposal Bruce On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > My userna

Re: Request to be added to ContributorsGroup on MoinMoin wiki

Hi John, My username for MoinMoin is BruceSnyder. Bruce On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:32 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Bruce, > > Whats your username? Each wiki requires separate accounts. > > John > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:30 AM Bruce Sny

Request to be added to ContributorsGroup on MoinMoin wiki

Please consider this a request to be added to the ContributorsGroup on the MoinMoin wiki at wiki.apache.org. I need to edit the RocketMQ proposal and currently I have no edit capability. Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E

Re: Spatial Information Systems Proposal

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:31 AM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote: Hi On behalf of the locallucene, localsolr communities, JPL, and myself, I present an Apache Spatial incubator Proposal. Apache Spatial will be a toolkit, allowing spatial data to be represented and queried in multitude

Re: Review-Then-Commit

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: Not a strong opinion, but I think that RTC hampers the free-flow of ideas, experimentation, evolution, and creativity. It is a damper on expressivity. You maneuver bureaucracy to get a change in. CTR is about making a change

Re: Review-Then-Commit

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote: Matthieu Riou wrote: Hi guys, What's the take of other mentors and the IPMC on podlings practicing RTC? I'm asking because some seem to see it as a blocker for graduation whereas I see it much more as a

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the long incubation

Re: status of PGP support in Maven

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Moved to the thread it belongs in ... Jason van Zyl wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: Better a bad decision than no decision, otherwise, soon, nobody will vote anymore... Not really. Consider

Re: [VOTE] [POLICY] Allow extra release distribution channels like the central Maven repository

On Thu, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, We've had a number of long discussions about the incubating projects using the central Maven repository to distribute their releases. The current policy is that incubating releases should not go to there. The

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF Graduation as TLP

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After 20 months in the incubator, 6 releases complete and 2 more on the way shortly, several new committers, and too much email traffic :-), the Apache CXF community (with support from our mentors) feels that we are

Re: RAT and MANIFEST.MF validation

On Nov 19, 2007 10:18 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RAT should not expect MANIFEST.MF to include a licence. Would it be useful if it insisted on certain other contents of the manifest file instead? e.g. Implementation-Title: Implementation-Vendor: Implementation-Vendor-Id:

Re: November Incubator Reports ARE LATE!

On Nov 11, 2007 1:45 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... from: Abdera Lokahi NMaven ServiceMix Woden WSRP4J XAP Yoko They must be submitted IMMEDIATELY. ServiceMix graduated from the Incubator, is it still

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Buildr for incubation

On 10/29/07, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote to incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete proposal text at

Re: [VOTE] Accept project Buildr for incubation

On 10/29/07, Assaf Arkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/29/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This sounds like Rake (http://rake.rubyforge.org/) to me. Is Buildr just a customized Rake? How is Buildr any different than Rake? Buildr is Rake underneath, we started with Rake

Re: [VOTE] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project (2nd thread)

On 7/17/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Forwarding to the dev list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 13, 2007 12:35 PM Subject: [VOTE] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project (2nd thread) To: general@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project (2nd thread)

On 7/19/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are the digest: http://www.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-servicemix-private-Digest-of%3A-thread.249-tf4108599s12049.html http://www.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-servicemix-private-Digest-of%3A-thread.203-tf4108591s12049.html Done. Bruce -- perl -e

Fwd: [VOTE] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project (2nd thread)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] * Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Jonas Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] * James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Thomas Termin [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Discuss] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project

On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about a pluggable messaging bus for enterprise service integration, mediation and composition and its related components ? I'd like to keep out the acronyms if possible ... No objection from me. I'd prefer to keep out the acronyms - I

Re: [Discuss] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project

On 7/12/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 12 July 2007 05:59, Guillaume Nodet wrote: enterprise service integration I find this project description too broad. Since I don't know what ServiceMix is about I can't suggest something better. Below is a stab at a description

Re: [VOTE] Release ServiceMix 3.1.1 (2nd try)

I have have some questions that need answering before we can proceed with the release. Please them inline below: On 5/29/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: On 5/28/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a friendly reminder. We're missing

Re: [VOTE] Should we treat incubator releases differently to normal releases

On 3/15/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two parts to the vote: ONE: Should Incubator tarballs go in the normal place (and thus mirrors). +1 TWO: Should there be an Incubator maven repository. -1 Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/16/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, i lost you. this whole we need podling artifacts in central repo because right now you are putting our user through a meat grinder has no basis in fact. Am asking for JIRA issues, email threads that show that this is indeed a serious

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

n 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #1) This is by design. We don't want to make it easy. This is what I really don't understand. Why must it be so difficult for users of the incubating projects? Daniel's summation of the situation is very accurate. All the separate

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because projects get killed/nuked as they don't have enough legs to stand on literally. You are assuming that every project makes it. It doesn't. We have to let people know that they are making a conscious choice by making it difficult. I'm

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5 extra minutes to add an additional entry in a pom.xml is not going to kill anyone. Can you please point me to email queries from end users on the podling mailing lists where they say that this was a pain? Give me a break! But it's not

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/15/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But by making it difficult, you are making it much more likely that the project will get killed/nuked. You're basically making it difficult for the project to grow their community just to

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's even knowing that you need to add another repo, [DIMS] This is by design. It's by design to add additional repos, it's by undocumented policy that the Incubator has a separate repo. it's pinging that repo every time you build

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan, thanks for being the amazing fount of wisdom and berating our silly idea. Please see below. On 3/15/07, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's even knowing that you need

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce, Please see below: Draft Policy(?): http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html Thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11566972785r=1w=2 First email: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-generalm=115669716709268w=2

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce, Please see below: Draft Policy(?): http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html Thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11566972785r=1w=2 First email: http

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought that I had later clarified that, but let's give it another go. First off, see the very first sentence. Second, the last sentence is the goal: users should have to make an explicit decision to make use of Incubator projects. As

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Let's not pretend that Maven couldn't be *way* *way* *way* smarter about repositories. Including delivering the long awaited security checks for downloaded artifacts. Instead of casting stones, why not file

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce, You may want to check with jvz. He is aware of the requirements. There are several email threads on various lists. Though am note sure if there is a specific JIRA was created. Thanks, I'll have to ask him about it, because I'd

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/15/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Snyder wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Let's not pretend that Maven couldn't be *way* *way* *way* smarter about repositories. Including delivering the long awaited security checks for downloaded

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

On 3/14/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Having a separate maven repository so that things don't go to maven central is just a hamstring on the products and yet another repository to be concerned with. I agree - there's no point in placing further hurdles in front of Incubating

Re: Dynamic message selectors and message scheduling

On 8/14/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... there seems to be an outstanding issue of there not being properly working XA transaction manager available as Open Source. Excerpt from the JOTM website (http://jotm.objectweb.org/): '15 February 2005: NOTICE The JOTM Team has

Re: [VOTE] approve the 4.0.2 release of ActiveMQ

On 8/17/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the Apache ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0.2 release binary. We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to perform the release. Release

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

On 7/13/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kenneth Tam wrote: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html A Mentor is a role undertaken by a permanent member of the Apache Software Foundation and is chosen by the Sponsor to actively lead in the

Re: Mentors - the more, the merrier? [WAS Re: [VOTE] Accept Heraldry into the Incubator]

On 7/14/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Snyder wrote: What do you mean fix the doc? Is it not the policy that mentors be members? I've seen and been involved in discussions where this was used as a reason that non-members could not be mentors of an incubating project

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve the 3.0-M2 release of ServiceMix

On 7/2/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/1/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/29/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 looks ok to me but note: 1 the various licenses for the jars shipped are present and rationally organized (good

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve the 3.0-M2 release of ServiceMix

On 6/29/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 looks ok to me but note: 1 the various licenses for the jars shipped are present and rationally organized (good) but are not referenced from the master LICENSE file. check with the legal policy documentation once (it is posted)

Re: JAXB API target

On 6/7/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, this is possibly OT, so I apologize in advance. A while ago there has been a discussion around a separate project for specifications on this list, which grew into nothing. Currently I am on the way to publish a clean room implementation of

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release

On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: README.txt and userGuide.html (at least) should be updated to reflect Apache ActiveMQ, not just 'ActiveMQ' Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release? I've found some information on the STATUS file but I think I'm missing something

Re: REMINDER: *** Board Reports DUE! ***

On 5/14/06, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought the incubated projects had been split into 3 groups, leaving the Incubator to report every month but each project to report every quarter? Yes. New projects report every month for their first quarter, established ones once per

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve 3.0-M1 release of ServiceMix

On 4/21/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo Simons wrote: James, dude, *sigh*. I feel like a broken record these days. Nowhere does any policy ever say you can do stuff which is not permitted by law or for which you

Re: Jini Head's Up

On 4/16/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be happy to help mentor... To be a mentor of a project, you must be an Apache Member: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL

Re: $project.xml files for ServiceMix and ActiveMQ

On 2/1/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ServiceMix and ActiveMQ folks: Sorry for the interruption in karma this afternoon. It was inadvertent but not inappropriate. Noel tells me that he's been maintaining your podling's

Re: DONE : Re: WADI mailing lists

On 12/15/05, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/14/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Done. As per the wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ WadiProposal, created wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wadi-user@incubator.apache.org wadi

Re: DONE : Re: WADI mailing lists

On 12/14/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Done. As per the wiki, http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ WadiProposal, created wadi-dev@incubator.apache.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wadi-user@incubator.apache.org wadi-commits@incubator.apache.org And put jgenender and myself as

Re: WADI mailing lists

On 12/14/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right. I've heard discussion both ways on this, so just want someone to clarify. I don't really care. geir On Dec 14, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote: On 12/14/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking

Re: PROPOSAL : Apache Harmony - J2SE 5 Project

On 5/6/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We, the sponsoring members listed below, ask that you accept the following proposal for a new project at Apache, an effort centered around architecting and implementing J2SE 5. +1 Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL

Re: Is HSQLDB compatible with ASF license?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/10/05 5:19 PM instead of dropping the database for tests, could you use something like dbunit which can help set the state of the db consistently in testing. I've used DbUnit quite a bit and IMO it is prohibitively slow for unit testing. An in-memory database is the

Re: Where, oh where has my Agila gone ? Where, oh where ...

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:57:22 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I sure would like to see even a hint of what it is - I have been tracking it since Sept 2004 and have not seen even a trace !! Just check it out from SVN and dig in: svn co

Re: Apache Agila : BPM engine

Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Bruce Snyder wrote: I'm curious to know how it compares to jBpm, OpenSymphony's OSWorkFlow and ObjectWeb's Enhydra Shark. jBpm uses the ASL, OSWorkFlow uses the ASL and Shark uses the LGPL. I believe each one of these has different features than the other. I'd like

Re: Apache Agila : BPM engine

Julian wrote: Geir, I have been evaluating BPM for some time now, and was just about to implement one when this happened. I am now very curious and excited to see how Gluecode's engine was constructed. There is little documentation on Gluecode's site so I would greatly appreciate any answers you

Re: Apache Agila : BPM engine

Endre Stølsvik wrote: On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: | All, | | The Jakarta PMC has voted to accept in Jakarta the contribution of a | BPM engine from Gluecode, my employer, and I am starting the basic work | of getting it into [and out of] incubation. BPM.. Rite. DJ-lingo: Beats

Re: Apache Agila : BPM engine

Andreas Kuckartz wrote: Sounds interesting. Is a more detailed description availiable somewhere ? Andreas, There's more info posted on the Agila Incubator site at the following URL: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila.html Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack(u30,0G)[EMAIL

Re: Anyone wants to incubate MyFaces?

This one time, at band camp, Jim Jagielski said: JJOn Jun 13, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote: JJ JJ I'm fairly certain there is sufficient interest for this, but there JJ would JJ need to be a sponsoring entity, champion, and mentor. I don't think JJ this JJ would be a problem, but you

Re: Difference between Tomcat and Geronimo

This one time, at band camp, Zhang, Larry (L.) said: ZLLJust wondering since we already have Tomcat why bother to develop Geronimo, what is the difference between these two. Tomcat only addresses Servlet and JSP specs which is only a subset of the J2EE specs. Geronimo addresses the full set of

Re: Questions regarding a Clover donation

This one time, at band camp, David Blevins said: DBOn Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:48:23PM -0400, Alex Karasulu wrote: DB I was also thinking of approaching JetBrains for IDEA licenses for our DB group as well. DB DB DBBoy would I love an IDEA license. An individual license is only US $249 for the

Re: [VOTE] Official Name for Geronimo Project

This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said: BL 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them BL accountable for their decision. BL BL+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique position. We are BLtrying to ensure that new projects/new committers in new