No -1s in 72 hours.
This clearance passes.
Thanks all!
Jan
--
On 20 Jun 2015, at 15:58, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
Heya,
on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for
CouchDB Docker:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip
No -1s in 72 hours.
This clearance passes.
Thanks all!
Jan
--
On 22 Jun 2015, at 12:32, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
Heya,
on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for
CouchDB nano:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip
No -1s in 72 hours.
This clearance passes.
Thanks all!
Jan
--
On 20 Jun 2015, at 16:02, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
Heya,
on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for
CouchDB CouchPerUser:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk
Heya,
on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for CouchDB
nano:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/couchdb-nano.xml?view=markup
Code: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1809262/nano-asf/nano.tar.gz
Origin:
Heya,
on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for CouchDB
Docker:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/couchdb-couchperuser.xml?view=markup
Code: https://people.apache.org/~klaus_trainer/dist/ip-clearance/
Origin:
Heya,
on behalf of the CouchDB project, I’d like to request IP Clearance for CouchDB
Docker:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/couchdb-docker.xml?view=markup
Dear Incubator,
On behalf of the CouchDB project, I’m requesting IP Clearance for the CouchDB
Mango contribution:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/couchdb-mango.xml?view=markup
Thank you!
Best
Jan
--
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with
Dear Incubator,
(if this isn’t the right list to ask this, please direct be to the correct
place).
The CouchDB community was approached by the lead developer of
https://github.com/dscape/nano to have the project become apart of Apache
CouchDB. The community has voiced some interest in
No -1 in 72 hours (and more).
This motion passes, thanks everybody :)
Best
Jan
--
On 14 Oct 2013, at 21:59 , Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Incubator,
A committer offers a future-port of CouchDB to be merged back into the
mainline project.
The code is up on:
zip: http
Dear Incubator,
A committer offers a future-port of CouchDB to be merged back into the mainline
project.
The code is up on:
zip: http://dl.refuge.io/rcouch-0.7.1.tar.gz
sha: 332b09635d9ca55122ee02903984808f183a4674
The IP Clearance document:
72h up.
Thanks all!
Jan
--
On Feb 6, 2013, at 22:50 , Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
Dear Incubator,
A number of non-committers offer a new admin interface to be submitted to
CouchDB.
The code is up on:
git: https://github.com/cloudant-labs/couchdb/commits/fauxton (commit
Dear Incubator,
A number of non-committers offer a new admin interface to be submitted to
CouchDB.
The code is up on:
git: https://github.com/cloudant-labs/couchdb/commits/fauxton (commit
c31fa4bfb3448b04c9e5f27a656858e81d476e80)
zip:
On 21 Aug 2009, at 08:58, ant elder wrote:
What do people think about changing the poddling release voting
process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the
poddlings dev list instead of the dual voting we have now with a
poddling dev list vote followed by an general@ vote? This
On Nov 8, 2008, at 15:17 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your
support.
On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC I am now calling a vote:
[ ] Yes, CouchDB is ready to become a top
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Jan Lehnardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Incubator General List, dear IPMC,
thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your
support.
On behalf of the Apache CouchDB PPMC I am now
Hi Niclas,
On Nov 9, 2008, at 05:41, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Jan Lehnardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jan,
thanks for calling the vote.
U. You often address yourself in this manner, or what is
going on?
I believe it is called humour, but we
project at the ASF and
the
IPMC will recommend the proposed resolution quoted below to the
Board.
[ ] No, CouchDB is not yet ready, it should stay in the Incubator.
Thank you.
Cheers
Jan
--
On Nov 3, 2008, at 18:19, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Dear Incubator General List,
The community
Hi Jan,
thanks for calling the vote.
On Nov 8, 2008, at 15:17, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Dear Incubator General List, dear IPMC,
thank you all for your comments on whether CouchDB should graduate
from the Incubator to a top level project. I think we have your
support.
On behalf of the Apache
[2] http://couchdb.markmail.org/message/hzge6ofddnknhqby
[3] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/couchdb.html
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Jan Lehnardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Incubator General List,
The community and developers of Apache CouchDB deem
the project ready for graduation
Hi Robert,
On Nov 4, 2008, at 14:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small - you
only have to loose a couple of people and you're on the verge of not
being a viable
On Nov 4, 2008, at 15:08, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Jan Lehnardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Nov 4, 2008, at 14:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
I know theres been a push to get projects to graduate, but IMO
CouchDB
would benefit from growing
below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache CouchDB Project:
* J Chris Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Damien Katz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Christopher Lenz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Jan Lehnardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Noah Slater ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NOW
On Jul 5, 2008, at 18:50, Craig L Russell wrote:
A very simple approach would be to send a message to each podling-
dev list reminding them to check the http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
page and file a report if they're due.
I don't think it's an imposition or a burden to
Heya,
On Jun 28, 2008, at 10:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Audit Report: 2008-06-21 - 2008-06-28
==
* 14 files were added
* 0 files were modified
* 0 files were deleted
For details see http://incubator.apache.org/audit/changes-2008-06-28.html
I'm not sure
Hi,
On Feb 23, 2008, at 12:48, Leo Simons wrote:
On Feb 21, 2008, at 7:36 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Now that CouchDB has been brought into the Incubator, is there
anything that
the old TripleSoup project would have to offer?
Hmmmh? Like what?
TripleSoup code is mostly in C, for serving
Hi,
I'm Jan Lehnardt, one of the contributers
of the CouchDB project.
On Feb 12, 2008, at 20:36, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008 11:09 AM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
72 hours, two dozen votes, all positive, many binding. This vote
clearly passes.
First: Thank you for accepting
26 matches
Mail list logo
