Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > The release artifacts can be found at : > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On Nov 6, 2016 15:58, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote. > > Please vote

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

wiki server quickly, avoiding much impact on this months report. * Miscellaneous - None * Credits - Report Manager: John D. Ament Summary of podling reports * Still getting started at the Incubator - AriaTosca - Guacamole - Hivemall - iota

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

f it. These questions were simply leading questions to try to give you some ideas of what you could put in that section. John > > Best Regards ~ > > Von Gosling > > > 2016-11-06 17:20 GMT+08:00 Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>: > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:26 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

not an > option in ASF infra. > > - Henry > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:29 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:49 AM Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi J

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Von to respond to two questions posed by John with his > thoughts: > > Von, can you please provide your thoughts on the following two questions > specifically: > > - How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ communities to > build cross platform clients?

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

manager gives huge kudos to the infra team for replacing the moin-moin wiki server quickly, avoiding much impact on this months report. * Miscellaneous - None * Credits - Report Manager: John D. Ament Summary of podling reports * Still getting

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

iments with Whimsy and > Traffic Server; same rules would apply to this podling) > > The original discussion took place after the initial submission, see [1] > > Does that help ? > > Regards > Felix > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1c22a29b69e944ee72527

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:43 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > The proposal looks fine in general, but I'm slightly concerned about: >https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/graphs/contributors > > It seems that the model so far has been -- through huge blobs of > code over the

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating) as a TLP

After seeing the PPMC respond quickly and sensibly to issues I identified without push back, I'd be happy to see them graduate. (I'm also really anxious to drive down our podling count) John On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Roman, > > Geode

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

I raised the concern over using github as the primary repo. This is still unresolved, as I understood it. John On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all > > I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]: > > - restructured the API Gateway

Re: [EXPERIMENT] Moving Incubator Website from CMS to gitpubsub

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:03 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:37 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > ...is there any interest in moving, or is there a preference to stay on > CMS and > > SVN?... &

Re: Need permission again -- Permission to edit the Incubator wiki page for Apache Distributed-Log

for your kindly help. > > Such a quick response. > > > > Regards. > > -Jia > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:08 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Done, happy editing. > >> > >> > >> On

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Bruce, While Willem and Luke are both foundation members, neither is on the IPMC. That's easy enough to rectify if you can get them to send appropriate emails out requesting membership. I'm assuming the mailing lists will all be in the new format of list@rocketmq.i.a.o The RocketMQ github site

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating) - rc1

+1 release looks good. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:00 PM Velmurugan Periasamy wrote: > Incubator PMC: > > Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating). > > [VOTE RESULT] thread: > >

Re: Need write access to the incubator wiki

I've readded you. There were a few emails about the data loss yesterday, apologies. John On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:49 PM Donald Szeto wrote: > Not sure why but I have lost my wiki account and just recreated one > (DonaldSzeto). Would someone please give me write access?

[EXPERIMENT] Moving Incubator Website from CMS to gitpubsub

All, I started a little experiment to move the incubator website from CMS to git. There's a few reasons I've looked at it. First, I've seen a lot of cases where people commit changes to the various control files (podlings.xml, {podling}.xml) without running the necessary CMS steps to publish

Re: Incubator chat on Hipchat?

I'm also thinking of it as a Q area, quick help, or quick discussions. Not decision making, any decision making should be copied back to the list. John On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:31 AM Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Emilian Bold

Incubator chat on Hipchat?

All, Infra recently started leveraging hipchat. A few PMCs have made use of it. I was wondering, would it be beneficial to anyone if we setup an incubator room in hipchat? John

Re: Please check your podling reports - November 2016

org/list.html?c...@incubator.apache.org > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:22 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > All, > > > > There was an issue with the moin-moin wiki this morning. Infra resolved > it > > via migration, however several revisions of the report

Please check your podling reports - November 2016

All, There was an issue with the moin-moin wiki this morning. Infra resolved it via migration, however several revisions of the report were lost (about 15 of them). Please double check the reports and repost anything lost. I apologize for any inconvenience. John

Re: Not seeing wiki updates

If you don't mind, please repost it. Infra emailed out about some issues w/ the moin moin wiki server. Its been replaced, and looks like a little bit of data loss occurred. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:03 PM Keith Turner wrote: > Yesterday I thought I updated >

Re: Permission to Edit Wiki

As mentioned in another email, already granted access. On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:00 PM Alan Ross wrote: > Alan Ross >

Re: Write access to the wiki

Added, happy editing On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:17 PM Mark Grover wrote: > Hi, can you please grant me write access to the wiki for updating a board > report? > My username is MarkGrover. > > And, I am not on this list, so if you make sure I am cc'ed back on your > response,

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "November2016" by zhaijia

Jia, I'll fix the conflicts. On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:30 PM Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" > for change notification. > > The "November2016" page has been changed by zhaijia: >

Re: Initial Reminder - Incubator PMC Report - November 2016

nd that, its once per quarter. Per [1], Juneau is done for the year and will next report in January. [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/report-groups.txt > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:59 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > November 2016 Incubator report

Re: Wiki write access

Added, happy editing! On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:27 PM Marius van Niekerk < marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > My user (mariusvniekerk) needs wiki access to author the podling report for > Apache Toree. > > regards > Marius van Niekerk > > > -- > regards > Marius van Niekerk >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

I'm going to switch my vote to +1 for the release. Other issues are issues outside of this podling's domain. John On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 9:31 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:23 AM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

6, at 6:03 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:53 PM Craig Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> >>> On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>&

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:53 PM Craig Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > -1 due to the kinesis library issue. > > Can you provide a bit more detail on what the objection is with the > kinesis library? Given it's optional and not being distributed I thought > this would cover

Re: Permission to edit the Incubator wiki on behalf of Apache NetBeans

Done, happy editing! On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:16 AM Wade Chandler wrote: > All, > > I haven’t seen any responses to my question of who will fill in the > report, nor any messages from other NB community members to be able to edit > the MoinMoin Wiki, so please give

Re: Permission to edit the Incubator wiki page for Apache Distributed-Log

Done, happy editing. On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:03 AM Jia Zhai wrote: > Hi, > I will be filling the November polding report for Apache Distributed Log. > > May I please heve the permission to edit this wiki page? > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 > > May user

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 3:23 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > So, with respect to the DEPENDENCIES file we're still good to go and > accept > > that a rat check won't work on the release? > > IMO it’s fine. JFYI you you ran rat manually on the release it shows a few

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam release 0.3.0-incubating

Hi, mvn apache-rat:check fails on your release due to the DEPENDENCIES file not having a header. If you don't need this file, please remove it. I would also recommend leaving apache-rat running all the time to avoid newly introduced issues. In addition, I notice that your build output includes

Re: Permission to edit the Incubator wiki page

Added, happy editing! On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:53 PM Susan Cline wrote: > Hi, John, > > My username for the wiki page is SusanCline. > > Thank you, > > Susan > > > Hi, > > > > I will be filing the November podling report for Apache Edgent. > > > > May I please have

Re: Permission to edit the Incubator wiki page

Please provide your incubator wiki username. John On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:05 PM Susan Cline wrote: > Hi, > > I will be filing the November podling report for Apache Edgent. > > May I please have permission to edit this wiki page? > >

Initial Reminder - Incubator PMC Report - November 2016

November 2016 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 Wed November 02 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun November 06 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun November 06 -- Summary due by end of day Tue November 08 -- Mentor signoff due

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

Release Managers - This brings up a good point. Please make sure you are consulting published artifacts to identify binding votes - don't rely on the poster to state that they are or are not binding. One such source is https://home.apache.org/phonebook.html John On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:59

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating

+1 release contents look good. On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:14 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating. > > This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.RC2, has successfully passed > a vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.4.0 (incubating)

+1 Release looks good. Thank you for resolving the past licensing issues. I suspect that your NOTICE file could use some polishing, I was unable to generate one for the binary output, see also http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary John On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:16 PM Nazeer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

Agreed, a reroll isn't required. Would be good if the next release is perfect, but not required. Here's my +1 on the release as well. Please also note that Craig provided a +1 on the dev list On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:59 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Does

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "October2016" by FlavioJunqueira

Please note that the final flag is set on the page. If you want to make edits at this point, please also update the board report posted on whimsy. John On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 9:59 AM Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

Sam, Can your or someone representing the proposed podling explain why using github as master is preferable to the current mirror strategy in use? John On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:29 AM Sam Ruby wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Greg Stein

[FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - October 2016

. Incubator usage of the new reporeq tool has been mixed. It would be great to see a blog post or something about how to submit git repository requests. * Credits - Report Manager: John D. Ament Summary of podling reports * Still getting started

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - October 2016

Bertrand, On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:57 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi John, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:57 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Below is the incubator board report > > I object to th

Re: [discuss] Move podling rosters to LDAP

Just wondering - do the old mail archives support this, or is it any IPMC member can access the podling private lists (and the PPMCs can't?) If the PPMCs can... can we just replicate that permission? On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:29 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > On 2016-09-02 12:41

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - October 2016

running with the initial set of committers. Signed-off-by: [X](ariatosca) Suneel Marthi [X](ariatosca) John D. Ament [ ](ariatosca) Jakob Homan Shepherd/Mentor notes: BatchEE BatchEE projects aims to provide a JBatch implementation (aka JSR352) and a set of useful ext

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "October2016" by GinoBustelo

> > could add our update. > > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:20 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Yesterday was the last day for sign off. Could someone from Toree > explain > > > the addition? > > &

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - October 2016

at 3:12 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 10:09 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > ...Below is the current draft of the board report... > > > > If you want I can add

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "October2016" by GinoBustelo

Yesterday was the last day for sign off. Could someone from Toree explain the addition? On Oct 10, 2016 11:13, "Apache Wiki" wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" > for change notification. > > The

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - October 2016

elected? Project is running with the initial set of committers. Signed-off-by: [X](ariatosca) Suneel Marthi [X](ariatosca) John D. Ament [ ](ariatosca) Jakob Homan Shepherd/Mentor notes: BatchEE BatchEE projects aims to provide a JBatch implementation (aka JSR352) an

Re: Changed missing monthly attributes

listed though). > > Thanks, > Makoto > > 2016-10-07 11:19 GMT+09:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > The monthly attributes were not set correctly for new podlings 'Hivemall' > > and 'Spot" which caused them to not be included in this month's

Changed missing monthly attributes

The monthly attributes were not set correctly for new podlings 'Hivemall' and 'Spot" which caused them to not be included in this month's report. I figure its ok, and simply pushed them back by a month. John

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC5

Your website tells people to checkout your master branch to build from source. This is a big no-no from an ASF standpoint. Snapshot builds should only be for developer use. CAn you double check your README files, missing headers. John On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:01 PM Donald Szeto

Re: [Proposal] Move Wiki Access Requests somewhere

The requests to get edit access to the incubator's wiki is always higher around the time of report submission. Is the concern that its too much email? John On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:32 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 05/10/2016 17:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > I think it's

Re: Wiki Write Access

Your account is still present. Are you sure you're logged in? Just double check, force a hard refresh, perhaps even log out and back in again. John On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:35 PM Ellison Anne Williams wrote: > My wiki write access appears to have evaporated somehow.

Re: How to denote unusual copyright circumstances, was Re: [VOTE] Impala 2.7.0 release candidate 3

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:58 PM Jim Apple wrote: > After further consideration, I have a patch in flight to fix that. It > is a compiled source file. > > However, my question was intended to be broader. As Henry notes, there > are some files that are Copyright Cloudera that

Re: Podling Report Reminder - October 2016

Youv'e been added, happy editing. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:41 PM Leigh Stewart <lstew...@twitter.com> wrote: > LeighStewart > > Thanks > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:39 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Sorry can you send your wiki userna

Re: Podling Report Reminder - October 2016

Sorry can you send your wiki username I can add you. On Oct 4, 2016 13:38, "Leigh Stewart" wrote: > Franck since I don't have access can you update the report with this info: > > (This is due by tomorrow) > > Thanks. > > --- > > Your project name > > DistributedLog >

Re: NetBeans next steps

Wade, ICLAs submitted before the vote don't get accounts created automatically. Please reach out to your mentors to get your account created. John On Oct 3, 2016 06:06, "Wade Chandler" wrote: > I have sent in my ICLA, and I received an acknowledgement it was received

Re: [VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

All, You can also build using mvn clean install -DcreateDependencyReducedPom=false (which is what I did). John On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:53 AM Drew Farris wrote: > Mike, > > If this release can only be built with Maven 3.0.4, would it make sense to > set up the enforcer plugin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Unomi 1.1.0-incubating release (take 2)

+1, release contents look good. On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 5:49 AM Thomas Draier wrote: > Hi all, > > The Unomi community has voted again for the release of Apache Unomi 1.1.0 > (incubating). Previous issue with license has been fixed, the dependency to > lgpl library has been

Re: [VOTE] HTrace 4.2-incubating release

+1 (binding) On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 1:16 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Resending this after being told that I used an incorrect subject format. > > On 2016-09-29 21:20 (-0500), "Mike Drob" wrote: > > Dear IPMC, please vote on our latest release candidate as an

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 9:40 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > Which other thread are you referring to? > > A response was received from DataStax legal.

October 2016 Incubator report timeline

October 2016 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2016 Wed October 05 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun October 09 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun October 09 -- Summary due by end of day Tue October 11 -- Mentor signoff due by

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "NetBeansProposal" by GeertjanWielenga

Its generally not good practice to edit the proposal once the vote has started. John On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:38 PM Apache Wiki wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Incubator Wiki" > for change notification. > > The

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

is there anyone on streams to object? Is this going to be more of a reboot or do we expect some amount of going forward? We had a similar case recently with another podling. There was a retirement vote, some community voices, when it came to actually reviving they got part way through and ended

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) and welcome aboard! On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:30 PM Ate Douma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the discussion thread on the NetBeans Proposal has ended, > please vote on accepting NetBeans into the Apache Incubator. > > The ASF voting rules are described at: >

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

Sooo does anyone feel that this needs to wait longer before starting a vote? John On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:06 AM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:35 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I see moving plugins

Re: Radical proposal: no initial list of committers

Its not a bad idea at all, except you're now relying on already stretched too thin mentors to help bootstrap the podling. And since we've agreed that champion can roll off once the podling has been accepted (since they don't have to be a mentor) you're limiting that a bit further. John On Tue,

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

I see moving plugins.netbeans.org out of Oracle control as being a graduation goal, not a start incubation goal. John On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:28 PM Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > > > > won't

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

Can you include the .asc file? John On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:32 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > added batchee source zip there > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/batchee/0.4-incubating/ > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:23 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days > of playing with GIT. > It is used e.g. in the following TLPs: > TomEE > DeltaSpike > Johnzon > CouchDB > Maven > and many, many more! > >

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > This is almsot a worst case calculation. > I too think that we will be able to cut down costs seriously as we do not > need 10 servers anymore. > > E.g. we can share the OSX box with OpenOffice, the GIT repo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

John, Will try to respond in line. On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 2:59 AM John McDonnell wrote: > Hi All, > > > I am a netbeans user that has been following this thread since the > proposal was announced and I am a little fascinated with this whole > process, it seems rather

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Geertjan, This is a sound plan. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:22 PM Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases > contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list. > > Here's what I propose:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Hi Bertrand, Responses in line. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:54 PM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Geertjan, > > I won't have time to look at your whole message now, just a few > clarifications as far as committers/PMC is concerned. > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 7:50 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

I spoke with Geertjan this afternoon. We both happened to be at the same popular java conference in San Francisco. I did give him some advice on the current initial contributors list. Basically two notes: - Add new members based on merit, not because prior to joining they are interested. The

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] JWPlayer SQE (Streaming Query Engine)

Are the binaries expected to be imported as well? https://github.com/jwplayer/SQE/tree/master/jars John On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Apache Storm has received a code donation for JWPlayer SQE (Streaming > Query Engine): > >

Re: Request to be added to ContributorsGroup on MoinMoin wiki

iki.apache.org/incubator/RocketMQProposal > > Bruce > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > My username for MoinMoin is BruceSnyder. > > > > Bruce > > > > On Mon

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

Ate, Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html John On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:37 AM Ate Douma wrote: > FYI, I've started below vote to retire Apache Streams, after I first > initiated a >

Re: Request to be added to ContributorsGroup on MoinMoin wiki

Bruce, Whats your username? Each wiki requires separate accounts. John On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:30 AM Bruce Snyder wrote: > Please consider this a request to be added to the ContributorsGroup on the > MoinMoin wiki at wiki.apache.org. I need to edit the RocketMQ

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

+1 binding While the release contents look odd, they're not wrong. We'll need to sort out the rest via legal prior to graduation. I would appreciate if the podling did start tracking a project specific goal of resolving the BSD licensing switch over to Apache License. John On Wed, Sep 7, 2016

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 11:14 AM Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > ...Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details > > specifically, before going

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Actually, I think a nightly build artifact would only be supported via Jenkins. Travis can upload to things like nexus, but I don't believe we publish our credentials outside of the environment. This may also be a use case for jenkins pipelines, to orchestrate the build steps required

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Sorry for top posting (phone), but of the machines listed, are any available to be migrated or donated to the ASF? Or expected to be? Mac builds is an interesting topic on this as well. On Sep 15, 2016 6:36 PM, "Geertjan Wielenga" < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Notes on the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Hi Bertrand, Geertjan, I too share some of the infra concerns Daniel's pointed out. For instance, where it is referenced one large hg repository, I count 33 repositories hosted on hg.netbeans.org. Some of them haven't been maintained in a while, so I wonder if they're relevant or not. I'm also

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

wrote: > John, > > I am checking MADlib github page for the src/utils folder and it indicates > that the latest commits are from 4-5 years ago. Could you point us to the > commit tag that you mentioned? > > Thanks, > > Orhan > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, John D

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

036 > and they have not been changed since that time. > > tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460 > > So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for > src/utils > > Frank > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament <johndam

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

> and > didn't > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases. > > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to > keyservers.net > > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is this > the > > Apache recomm

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "September2016" by smarthi

ng setup in Incubator. > > + Date of last release: > > + None > > - Signed-off-by: > + When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > + Project is being established in incubator with the proposed initial > set of committers. > + > + Signed-off-b

Re: finding a Champion

HI Roberto & Welcome! It might be a good thing to post some information about your project, what it does, if theres any existing source or community point links to it. Seeing something vibrant and functioning will definitely draw out a champion. John On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:05 PM Roberto

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

specific, so why are they not using proper license headers? John On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:53 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm getting a problem with your key. Can you look at it and tell me if > you think the issue's on my end? > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johna

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

I'm getting a problem with your key. Can you look at it and tell me if you think the issue's on my end? Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made

What goes in the NOTICES file?

All, I was wondering if someone can point me to a resource that clearly identifies what goes into the NOTICES file for a source and binary release? I've seen Justin's video, but would be great to also have it written down. John

Re: [discuss] Move podling rosters to LDAP

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:42 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > For background, if you go to the Apache phonebook > (https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html) and click on the "Podling > name" input field and click on enter you will see an incomplete list of > podlings. If you click

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

Reach out to infra. You can create a JIRA ticket. John On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:52 PM Jochen Theodorou wrote: > Only partially related to the namespacing problem... > > But does somebody here know who to contact if I wanted to have a docker > image on

September 2016 Incubator PMC Report Timeline

September 2016 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2016 Wed September 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun September 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun September 11 -- Summary due by end of day Tue September 13 -- Mentor

Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:30 AM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 6:28 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:58 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > > wrote: >

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >