eless right now. This same RI is part of the initial codebase for
> this project, so the OJB JDO 1.0.X interface can actually become useful
> =)
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2004, at 12:01 PM, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
>
> > Doesn't ORB already support JDO?
&g
Doesn't ORB already support JDO?
Oliver
On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:47:19 -0800, Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The DB project voted to adopt JDO last week-end, and they suggested I
> contact you to set up the resources for the project.
>
> I've attached the proposal. Perhaps yo
Hi David,
first of all let me say that I really appreciate your help! Second,
let me say that I have no reservations concerning Jackrabbit and
certainly do not see it as a threat to Slide or the other way round
(which others seemed to feel in other posts), but rather want to
explore where each pro
Two (maybe dumb) questions
(1) Where can I get the (tentative) JCR API?
(2) When *presumably* will Jackrabbit be mature enought to be an
alternative to the current Slide backend?
Oliver
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:41:49 -0800, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no problem. There i
> Mhh, a standard query API? WebDAV only specifies a query envelope, but
> not the query language. Or do you mean the Slide API exposes a standard
> query API? Which standard does it use?
There is more than an envelope, there also is the basic search:
http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-re
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:00:23 +0100, Rolf Kulemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 12:46, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> > Hi Rolf,
> >
> > thanks for this honest statement. I was just wondering a little bit:
> > Slide's main focus is on provi
> Ok, sorry, I missed the WebDAV thingy. You are right. BUT WebDAV is very
> limited; see transactions and a standard query API. However, this is
> another discussion.
>
> This is exactly the reason why I won't use Slide for Lenya; I can not
> use WebDAV because of its limitations and I do not wan
e:
> On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 00:03, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
>
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > just heard of JCMS proposed to be incubated and it sounds interesting.
> > Looking at the description and the sources I wonder why not helping
> > the Slide project to achi
Folks,
just heard of JCMS proposed to be incubated and it sounds interesting.
Looking at the description and the sources I wonder why not helping
the Slide project to achive the goals stated in the proposal. Goals
are pretty similar and Slide is working code.
Oliver
-
