Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) > On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:41, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do

Re: [VOTE] Graduate ODE to a Top Level Project

]) * Niclas Hedhman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Paul R. Brown ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Paul Fremantle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Rob Davies ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that John Smith be appointed to the office

Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

+1 (non-binding) On 13 Jul 2006, at 07:48, Jason van Zyl wrote: Jason van Zyl

Re: Ode / BPEL Donation of BPEL 2.0 Engine

Would it not be more expedient to have Ode as an umbrella project - but the goal would to be to try and find commonality between all the projects and see it's possible to merge? It's a complex problem - no doubt (not because the individual code bases are complex - but they are completely

Re: Let's rewind!!! (Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project)

I'm not sure it's consensus - more a case of folks getting fed up with the petty arguing and just want to get things done. On 16 Feb 2006, at 08:54, Matthieu Riou wrote: I'm really glad to finally see a consensus emerging! Matthieu. Bill, It seems everybody has exhibited a willingness to

Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project

The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing - It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to Apache in the future ... On 5 Feb 2006, at 21:03, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: James Strachan wrote: We have received the generous donation of a complete and

Re: [VOTE] approve a milestone release of ActiveMQ?

+1 Release the binary as 4.0-M4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is the incubator out of control?

I Also share these concerns - is there currently a process to have continuous reviews throughout the entire life-cycle of all new and existing projects - to ensure that everything under the 'apache' brand is and will continue to be 'worthy' ? Sorry if there's already a process in place -