+1 (non-binding)
> On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:41, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain.
> [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ in
* Alex Boisvert ( [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> * Cory Harper([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> * Davanum Srinivas ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> * Guillaume Nodet( [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> * Lance Waterman ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> * Maciej Szefler ( [E
+1 (non-binding)
On 13 Jul 2006, at 07:48, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Jason van Zyl
Would it not be more expedient to have Ode as an umbrella project -
but the goal would to be to try and find commonality between all the
projects and see it's possible to merge?
It's a complex problem - no doubt (not because the individual code
bases are complex - but they are completely diff
I'm not sure it's consensus - more a case of folks getting fed up
with the petty arguing and just want to get things done.
On 16 Feb 2006, at 08:54, Matthieu Riou wrote:
I'm really glad to finally see a consensus emerging!
Matthieu.
Bill,> It seems everybody has exhibited a willingness to
ote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
Because we care enough to have the debate. If anyone wants silenc
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
On 5 Feb 2006, at 21:03, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
We have received the generous donation of a complete and w
+1 Release the binary as 4.0-M4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I Also share these concerns - is there currently a process to have
continuous reviews throughout the entire life-cycle of all new and
existing projects - to ensure that everything under the 'apache'
brand is and will continue to be 'worthy' ?
Sorry if there's already a process in place -