Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
Hi Justin, The license didn’t change for the other repo. It has always been Apache License, Version 2. Not sure if that matters? Sander On 22 Jun 2021, at 14:45, Justin Mclean wrote: HI, Again I request that you please don’t mix private and public channels. IMO More than just a SGA is neede

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
But we are constantly discussing that particular repo right? It's the aothet one that was just added. Sander On 22 Jun 2021, at 16:05, Justin Mclean wrote: HI, > The license didn’t change for the other repo. It has always been Apache > License, Version 2. Not sure if that matters? The lice

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
Hi Justin, I'm sorry, I just hit "reply-all" as I have no idea what's a private list and what's not. But I'll stop mailing... Sander On 22 Jun 2021, at 17:08, Sander van Harmelen wrote: But we are constantly discussing that particular repo right? It's

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
A, I just now see your message Rohit (it got in my spambox). But yes, I think the mail I've send just now is pretty much inline with your explanation in this mail... Sander On 23 Jun 2021, at 07:30, Rohit Yadav wrote:  My understanding is the plugin was originally started as a repo or work b

Re: IP clearance officer for accepting Terraform

2021-06-22 Thread Sander van Harmelen
Hi Justin, The story is a bit different. I started, maintained and build most of both these code bases. And as far as I know I'm (still) legally both the author and the owner of the IP as the company I work for (for the last 12 years) has a chapter in their contract that states that any open so