Paul Fremantle wrote:
Actually I'm wrong
The correct wording (I think) is:
..establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge
to the public, that simplifies the development, deployment and management
of
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Meeraj, Jeremy
Please read my note again. At no point did I say or imply that BEA led
anything. The only thing I said about BEA was:
the two companies who couldn't agree to do it together in Tuscany.
Is there anything
[x] +1 (non-binding) Accept BlueSky for incubation
Simon
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special
thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is
documented here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky
Please
The recent Tuscany 1.0 release included Ode integration with an
implementation.bpel component type. We also have experimental support
for integration with Geronimo.
In the last 2 months, 3 new committers have been added, one is in progress
as Paul has said, and one is being discussed. Of these
Jim Jagielski wrote:
IMO, the need for Independent committers is based on the
following wants and needs:
1. Reduce the influence that any single entity has over
the codebase and/or its direction.
2. Reduce the risk that, if a single entity suddenly drops
its support for a
Luciano Resende wrote:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
creation and maintenance of open-source software for distribution
at no charge to the public, that simplifies the development,
deployment and management of distributed applications built as
compositions of
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Not to go down a rat hole but I think that clarifying the affiliations
needs some refinement. On Apache Geronimo we have a few committers
that work for IBM but their participation is not part of their day
job. Would the committer in question for this situation
I will be attending ApacheCon US 2007 and I would be very pleased
to take part in FastFeather to tell people about Apache Tuscany.
Simon
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Hello incubator committers!
You should have received an email from me if you are a committer,
sent on 8/17, encouraging you
I'm following up on this thread which has gone very quiet. AFAIK
there has not yet been an acknowledgement of the software grant form
by an officer of the ASF. Can anyone who is an officer of the ASF
help with this, please?
Simon
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
The Tuscany project (which is
The Apache Incubator Tuscany team is pleased to announce the availability
of the SCA Java 1.0-incubator-M2 release, together with a restructured
Web site with enhanced content and better organization. Information about
Tuscany, including details of the release contents and download links can
be
Robert,
Thanks (as always) for the careful review. See comments inline below.
Simon
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12/13/06, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A vote has recently completed on the tuscany-dev list to release
Tuscany SCA Java M2. The vote passed with binding +1s from
The vote has therefore passed, and we will proceed to make the
release artifacts public.
Thanks to all who reviewed this release and voted.
Simon
Simon Nash wrote:
A vote has recently completed on the tuscany-dev list to release
Tuscany SCA Java M2. The vote passed with binding +1s from rfeng
A vote has recently completed on the tuscany-dev list to release
Tuscany SCA Java M2. The vote passed with binding +1s from rfeng,
jmarino, rineholt, svkrish, isilval, antelder, dims, and jboynes,
and a non-binding +1 from Simon Nash. The vote thread is here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
