+1
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
The Lucene.Net community feels ready to graudate. Our internal vote was a
success (~40 +1's and a bit of a mess because we had a number of mailing
lists which spread our vote out - sorry about that
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko ita...@code972.com wrote:
That mail from Stephan got lost in my inbox, so I never followed up on
that. I guess now would be a good chance to tie up all loose ends.
How do I do the ICLA?
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Troy Howard thowar
My understanding is that we can include the code as long as we have a
ICLA from Itamar. This was discussed at length in January for another
contribution that the same contributor wanted to donate. Stephan
(Bodewig, our Incubation mentor) laid out what needed to be done
really clearly in that
Regarding:
I cannot read the tar.gz files with my normal tools (hexdump shows
that they are in RAR format), and the hashes have got spurious lines
in them which break automated checkers.
Looks like you guys are a) building the release packages on Windows,
and b) using Microsoft's FCIV tool to
of release notes or changes file
within the distributions
...ant
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is
available and ready for your testing and voting. This will be our
first release since
All,
This vote passes with four (4) positive IMPC votes.
Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 will be officially released as
Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating.
We sincerely appreciate everyone who contributed to making our first
release under our new status a success.
Thanks,
Troy
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is
available and ready for your testing and voting. This will be our
first release since returning to the Incubator. We look forward to
your input.
Release candidate artifacts:
Oops, typo!
... and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Lucene.Net PMC
votes are cast.
should have been :
... and passes if a majority of at least three +1 Incubator PMC votes
are cast.
Thanks,
Troy
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I'm
My point was:
Bill made a statement, which though rather neutral and ambiguous,
seemed to indicate that he (or perhaps a silent mass of others) did
not think the proposal was such a good idea, due to the risks
associated with a significant amount of corporate support and
involvement. At least,
+1
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Ate Douma a...@douma.nu wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Rave proposal is in good
shape so I'd like to bring up the vote for accepting Rave into the
Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/RaveProposal and also
In my opinion, a reasonable compromise would be to set it as a project
goal to reduce corporate dependency on the committers list.
I would take that so far as to treat it as a bug, place an issue in
JIRA to that effect, and schedule a date/version for the issue to be
resolved. This will remind
rgard...@apache.org wrote:
On 24/02/2011 23:11, Troy Howard wrote:
In my opinion, a reasonable compromise would be to set it as a project
goal to reduce corporate dependency on the committers list.
I'm really confused where this is coming from. The goal of incubation is to
generate sufficient
All,
We've recently been working to update the Lucene.Net website to
reflect our new status as an Incubator Podling and just generally get
up to date. During that process we have been discussing the project
branding and logo.
The discussion can be found in the comments here:
, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
We've recently been working to update the Lucene.Net website to
reflect our new status as an Incubator Podling and just generally get
up to date. During that process we have been discussing the project
branding and logo
Good advice. Will do that.
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Troy,
I think it would be good to send the below to trademarks@ and to start there.
HTH,
Chris
On Feb 18, 2011, at 3:13 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
Ok
On 01/26/2011 10:05 PM, Troy Howard wrote:
All,
Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan
12th, we now have three mentors signed up and would like to call a
vote to accept Lucene.Net into the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is included below and can also be found
the proposal done, the next thing to do would be to call a vote
to accept it.
-Grant
On Jan 20, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-01-18, Troy Howard wrote:
If I recall correctly we need at least two mentors before the
Incubator PMC can vote on our proposal. Is there anyone else
enhancements. Three of
the other proposed initial committers, Troy Howard, Chris Currens and
Sergey Mirvoda are both already actively involved in other open source
projects, either as committers of code or in coordination roles. Troy,
Chris, Sergey and Prescott are currently committers on a Lucene.Net
fork
out as Mentor?
Thanks,
Troy
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Gianugo Rabellino gian...@rabellino.it wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Please review our proposal for moving the Lucene.Net project back to
the Incubator.
I am happy to support
text form follows this email and the wiki is located here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
Thanks,
Troy Howard
= FINAL =
'Subitted on Wednesday, January 12th, 2011'
= Lucene.Net - A .NET port of Lucene =
== Preface
20 matches
Mail list logo
