a license, it looks like we
> cannot backport the BSL codes to the Apache License branch.
>
>> If there is a newer version of the software under BSL, can I backport any of
>> the code to an older, Open Source, version of Akka?
>
>> No. In this circumstance, you would
Dear Apache Incubator Community,
We propose to contribute Chunjun as an Apache Incubator project.
We are still looking for possible Champion and Mentors if anyone would like to
volunteer. Thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
Real-time computing engine team of DTStack.
#Chunjun Proposal
##Abstract
+1, I saw we have had several discussion threads and they have had several
chances without positive outcome.
> On Feb 16, 2022, at 07:20, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Please vote to retire BlueMarlin. This is a group that has made no progress
> as an Apache podling. There is no
all" or "user cases" to a submenu like "Powered
> by".
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://kafka.apache.org/powered-by
>
> --
>
> 此致！Best Regards
> 陈明雨 Mingyu Chen
>
> Email:
> chenmin...@apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> A
itHub @kezhenxu94
Apache Incubator PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Carry my +1 (binding) from dev@ list
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Dec 6, 2021, at 12:05, Serge Panev wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 8.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubat
+1 binding to bring SeaTunnel into the incubator
> On Dec 3, 2021, at 21:56, Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Following up the [DISCUSS] thread on SeaTunnel [1] I would like to call a
> VOTE to accept into the Apache Incubator.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
Oh yes, the problem is that `3rdparty/ctc_include` should be listed under
`BSD-3` section instead of `Apache-2.0` section in the `./LICENSE` file.
> On Sep 13, 2021, at 20:28, Xun Liu wrote:
>
> hi, zhenxu
>
> It is stated in the `./LICENSE`[1] file that 3rdparty/ctc_include i
> I checked the mxnet project again,
> and I found that all the files in the third-party submodule
> ./3rdparty/ctc_include did not include ASF headers.
Hi Xun, those files are from third-party, and is listed in LICENSE
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
-
/Users/chengpan/Projects/apache-kyuubi/work/release/kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz`
2. tar balls are signed by correctly.
3. “incubating” is in file names but “apache-“ is not, prefer to use
apache-kyuubi-1.3.0-incubating-bin.tgz.
4. “Incubating” is not in NOTICE file.
5. Source files have license
ello IPMC,
>
>
>
> The Apache brpc community has voted and approved the release of Apache
>
> brpc (Incubating) 1.0.0-rc02. We now kindly request the IPMC members
>
> review and vote for this release.
>
>
>
> brpc is an industrial-grade RPC framework with
Carry my +1 from dev@
> On Aug 30, 2021, at 07:10, Serge Panev wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 7.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
&
.
- it’s better to put “Apache" and "(incubating)" in the README.md at least for
the first time DataLab occurs, ex. Apache DataLab (Incubating).
- there is a hidden binary file in the source tar "doc/.DS_Store”, consider
removing it in the next release.
> On Aug 3, 2021, at 15:
Hi, -1 (binding)
1. the commit ID claimed in this thread doesn’t match the release tag v2.4.0
(https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/commit/dc841a2720ea0b5a6ca71f1b9c1aa7958d241f16).
> Release Commit ID:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-shenyu/
.
- LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP are correct.
- “Incubator” is in src tar name and docs.
-
> On Jun 11, 2021, at 11:39, Serge Panev wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.9.0, release
> candidate 3.
>
> Apache MXNe
; Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc06 release.
>
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
> and analysis.
>
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and approved this release:
> htt
ote:
>
> Hello all,
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache NLPCraft (incubating)
> version 0.7.5. Apache NLPCraft is a library for adding a natural language
> interface to any application.
>
> The Apache NLPCraft community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> release
rt a LAZY consensus vote in the IPMC.
>
> [ ] +1 Support to retire Weex from Apache Incubator
> [ ] -1 Do not Support to retire Weex from Apache Incubator (please
> provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [1]https://inc
PMC members want to give the following suggestions to the Shenyu's
> team
> - The incubating evaluation process only runs some checks on project
> branding, IP clearance, and community-related issues.
> - There is no endorsement of the project's technology from Apache or the
>
Hi
> I would like the first release of this package to be an official Apache
> release. I am therefore of the mindset that it should be treated as any other
> official Apache source code release.
Right, it should follow the Apache release policy and release source tar to be
an offici
t; >
> > Best,
> > Jincheng
> >
> >
> > Juan Pan 于2021年4月12日周一 下午7:55写道：
> >
> > > Welcome, looks many people are interested in this project.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
tanding, 0.14.0 has not been released. Why does 0.14.7 exist?
>>
>> [1] https://www.modb.pro/db/49638
>> [2] https://doris.apache.org/master/en/downloads/downloads.html
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
>> Twitter: _WenMing
>>
>
that’s the case, the license header in file
be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp is not complete,
please check and compare with other files, add the missing lines into it.
> I will fix the wrong path of
> "fe/fe-common/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit&
n/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit”,
but was listed as "fe/fe-common/src/test/java/org/apache/doris/common/jmockit”
in LICENSE.txt
The missing 3rd-party files in LICENSE.txt is not a blocker IMO because there
are files from the same owner ("be/src/olap/lru_cache.h”,
“be/sr
,
but I found the headers in these files are not the one ASF specified.
Note that there is dedicated license header for ASF projects, see this link [1]
-
plugins/databases/clickhouse/src/main/java/org/apache/hop/databases/clickhouse/ClickhouseDatabaseMeta.java
-
plugins/databases/clickhouse/src
at 12:36, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc03 release.
>
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based interactive SQL data warehousing for reporting
> and analysis.
>
> The Apache Doris community has voted on and
LICENSE file.
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/blob/release-0.7.0-rc/LICENSE
> On Mar 23, 2021, at 00:25, Yupeng Fu wrote:
>
> Felix and others,
>
> The git hash on the git tag is now the same as the one sent out in the
> vote. Please check again
> http
I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it didn’t get
the approvals from IPMC but was released actually (in both dist.a.o and GitHub).
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 06:14, Yupeng Fu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is
te:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Sorry for my -1 (non-binding)
>>>> Same as Kris Calvin.
>>>> Just my curiosity, DISCLAIMER-WIP existed in incubator-doris-0.12.0 but
>>> disappears from this candidate one?
>>>>
>>>>
>&
this thread.
[1]
-
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pinot/apache-pinot-incubating-0.7.0-rc1/
- https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/tree/release-0.7.0-rc1
- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepinot-1023
- https://repository.apache.org/content
-1 (non-binding) because I cannot see a DISCLAIMER file in the release tar,
neither in the GitHub repository.
> On Mar 15, 2021, at 10:56, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please review and vote on Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc02 release.
>
> Apache Doris is an MPP-based
Hi, there is a dedicated license header for ASF projects [1], while I saw you
are still using a common license header [2].
Also, I cannot verify the checksum via `shasum -a 512 -c
apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5-INCUBATING-source.tar.gz.sha512`, error message is
`shasum: apache-liminal-0.0.1rc5
+1 non-binding. Good luck!
—
Zhenxu Ke (柯振旭)
GitHub @kezhenxu94
> On Jan 30, 2021, at 04:32, Uma gangumalla wrote:
>
> Dear Incubator Community,
>
> We have discussed Apache Ratis Podling graduation in the incubator general
> DISCUSS thread[1] and We did not see
cussion under general mailing list [6], we believe
> ECharts is ready for graduation to a TLP, and we'd like to call on the vote
> to
> graduate Apache ECharts as TPL.
>
> This is a formal voting thread about Apache ECharts's graduation, please
> Vote:
> [ ] +1 - Reco
: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 14:29
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.13.0-incubating-rc03
The vote on Apache Doris (incubating) version 0.13 has been opened.
Looking forward your votes ^0^
Ling Miao
陈明雨 于2020年10月16日周五 下午9:03写道：
> +1 (non-bind
ang
> >
> >Twitter: willemjiang
> >Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >
> >On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:31 PM William Guo wrote:
> >>
> >> +dev
> >>
> >> -- Forwarded message -
> >> From: William Guo
> >> Date: Thu, Nov 1, 201
at the bottom of this email.
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 recommend to the Board the resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker
> to a TLP
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 don't graduate Apache FreeMarker to a TLP (please specify a reason)
>
> Thanks,
> J
-1
Ralph
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 10:22 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I'm calling to vote on a proposed policy change. Current guide at [1]
> indicates that maven artifacts should include incubator (or incubating) in
> the version string of maven artifacts. Its labeled as a best practice
+1 (non-binding)
On September 23, 2016 at 12:51:30 PM, Suneel Marthi (smar...@apache.org) wrote:
On September 22, 2016 at 5:05:39 PM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu) wrote:
On 2016-09-21 18:28, apache wrote:
> I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social
> web
> data interoperability. Participating in the incubator process has taught me a
>
> l
I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social web
data interoperability. Participating in the incubator process has taught me a
lot, and I would like the keep the project operating at Apache, but as Ate
points out the community around this podling has never been
The Apache Johnzon team is happy to announce the first release of
Apache Johnzon - version 0.1-incubating.
Apache Johnzon is an implementation of JSR-353 (JavaTM API for JSON
Processing) and provides additionally a set of useful extension for
this specification like an object mapper and some JAX
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Flex 4.8.0-incubating!
Apache Flex is an application framework for easily building Flash
Platform-based applications for mobile devices, the browser and desktop.
This is the first release under the Incubator of the Apache
I just wanted to let you know about a ConCom approved event in London,
UK this month. There will be an Apache Way talk and a few ASF projects
will be there. Maybe your projects should be too?
As you may already have seen the London Java Community (LJC) are
running their June Unconference
nanoTime, like this one?
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/System.html#nanoTime()
is there a difference?
Filip
Julius Davies wrote:
Hi, Commons Developers, Incubator,
I've been too busy over the last year to spend much time on incubating
not-yet-commons-ssl, but I just wante
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 7:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Craig has a good point - maybe that 'pruning' process, to the
extent it's appropriate, should happen before they start the actual
graduation process?
The question is how, and it's something
x27;s usual meritocracy rules.
The goal is to ensure that all Apache committers have gone through the
"meritocracy filter", which does not apply to people included in a
podling's initial committers list, for obvious reasons.
The suggested process is to have podling committers (
My vote, fhanik
For information, I'm blind copying incubator private alias.
[X] +1 offer Erik commit privileges in Imperius
[ ] -1 don't (why?)
Here's my enthusiastic +1
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e in English on technical topics. We want to share our work
with people who is interested in it around the world. We want new
volunteers to make our team more diverse, active and creative.
I'm sure we'll be fine with respect to communications ;)
For this is our first candidate
s on the proposal. I made one
small tweak; Tomcat, rather than Geronimo, should be one of the first
bindings.
Please vote on accepting project Imperius into the Apache Incubator.
The vote will run 1 week,
until Sunday, Oct. 7, 2007 or until all Incubator PMC members have voted.
[ ] +1 Accept
ration, we can add that to the
proposal. And, of course, the code is (suppose to be) modular, so
others
could at it at any time.
Lot more people deploy and manage large number of Tomcat instances
than Geronimo instances.
just ping me fhanik at apache dot org when you wish to do Tomcat
inte
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We proposed to develop a policy-based management infrastructure that
automates administrative tasks by executing policies
Sounds good. I will be curious to see the reaction from the HTTP Server
folks, but this sort of thing is very much needed in real-world deployme
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 17:36 -0400, Jim Hurley wrote:
I'm not going to try and pull a Bill Clinton with "it depends what the
definition of "is" is" but I'd answer that I believe the Jini
Community
views the project as *the* Jini implementation.
But *the* as i
Bob Scheifler wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
We have a tradition, for good reason, for not giving our projects
"technology domain" ownership for implementations. I'd never support
"Apache EMail" or "Apache Web".
It would help me if you could expla
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig.Russell wrote:
It would appear then that the "Apache Jini" podling would be the
[spec project], and the "to be named" podling the [implementation
project]. Fortunately, the incubator should be warmed up for a
naming discussion.
Apache
55 matches
Mail list logo
