Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2018-02-02 Thread Matthew Hayes
Hi John, Regarding the events you listed: - Podling discusses graduation. Done. See here . - Podling drafts a charter (whimsy more or less generates

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2018-02-01 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:23 PM Matthew Hayes < matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Given that it has been a few days and I've only seen positive feedback so > far, I have opened a new vote for graduation in the datafu dev >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2018-02-01 Thread Matthew Hayes
Given that it has been a few days and I've only seen positive feedback so far, I have opened a new vote for graduation in the datafu dev list. I will open a new vote here when this vote passes. -Matt On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:57

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2018-01-29 Thread Jakob Homan
+1 On 29 January 2018 at 15:49, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to reopen the discussion regarding Apache DataFu's graduation > from incubator. In the community vote >

[DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2018-01-29 Thread Matthew Hayes
Hi, I would like to reopen the discussion regarding Apache DataFu's graduation from incubator. In the community vote there was consensus to

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-10 Thread Eyal Allweil
Thanks sebb. I've opened the following Jira issue to track what we need to do with the web site. If you (or anyone) has more comments, and want to add them there, we'll try to take care of all of them. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-131 Regards,Eyal

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-04 Thread sebb
On 3 October 2017 at 21:45, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to kick off a discussion regarding Apache DataFu's graduation > from incubator. In the community vote >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-03 Thread John D. Ament
So, are we really saying that we have a case for a graduation with only 4 PMC members? Ideally we want to see committers == (P)PMC, but even then 5 PMC members is really considered the bare minimum. I'm not sure committers really matter, since the board resolutions only ever talk about PMC

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-03 Thread Mike Drob
I would go through the list of committers once (i.e. now, nearing graduation) and ask folks if they would like to remain committers post-graduation. If anybody responds in the negative or doesn't respond at all, then remove them from the list and move on. I think this is your one chance to shorten

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-03 Thread Matthew Hayes
Regarding Raphael's comment: You have 14 Committers, but only 4 for the proposed PMC? The project began incubation with 10 committers. If I recall correctly, the proposed list of committers was drawn largely from contributors in the git commit history in order to be inclusive and give them a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-03 Thread Mike Drob
I have concern about the DataFu process of removing committers due to inactivity, as outlined on this wiki page - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DATAFU/Becoming+a+Committer How often has this process been used? At many Apache projects, merit is considered to never expire.

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-03 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi Matthew You have 14 Committers, but only 4 for the proposed PMC? Regards Raphael Am .10.2017, 22:45 Uhr, schrieb Matthew Hayes : Hi, I would like to kick off a discussion regarding Apache DataFu's graduation from incubator. In the community vote

[DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

2017-10-03 Thread Matthew Hayes
Hi, I would like to kick off a discussion regarding Apache DataFu's graduation from incubator. In the community vote there was consensus to