Hi,
+1!
Kind Regards,
Furkan KAMACI
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:08 PM Moaz Reyad wrote:
> Ok. Thank you all.
>
> I will send the VOTE email since everyone agrees.
>
> Best regards,
> Moaz
>
> On 2019/09/13 19:56:15, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 Congratulations and and all the
Ok. Thank you all.
I will send the VOTE email since everyone agrees.
Best regards,
Moaz
On 2019/09/13 19:56:15, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 Congratulations and and all the best!
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> -
> To
Hi,
+1 Congratulations and and all the best!
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Ok, now that the SGA is filed, I'm +1 on this. Thanks for chasing this
down.
Alan.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:36 AM Beng Chin OOI wrote:
>
> A number have joined Alibaba, Kyoto University, Zhejiang University and
> other companies in
> various countries, and some still continue to contribute.
ในวันที่ พฤ. 5 ก.ย. 2019 06:13 Justin Mclean
เขียนว่า:
> Hi,
>
> I just took a look at the Sign incubator report and it needs some
> improvement. If you were a TLP if and a report like this was submitted to
> the board, it would likely be rejected, or attract questions. I suggest you
> add a bit
A number have joined Alibaba, Kyoto University, Zhejiang University and
other companies in
various countries, and some still continue to contribute.
On Singapore side, IMDA https://www2.imda.gov.sg is pushing the system
for adoption by
the local industry/SME.
SINGA-lite (with federated
Hi,
> 1. The affiliation of the proposed PMC can be found here [1]. It shows that
> the PPMC members belong to six different organizations (not counting the
> affiliations of the mentors)
Thanks for that I can see that 1/2 are from the National University of
Singapore, would the project
Hi Justin,
Thank you for the careful checking.
To answer your questions:
1. The affiliation of the proposed PMC can be found here [1]. It shows that
the PPMC members belong to six different organizations (not counting the
affiliations of the mentors)
2. The README file [2] was updated to
Hi,
I just took a look at the Sign incubator report and it needs some improvement.
If you were a TLP if and a report like this was submitted to the board, it
would likely be rejected, or attract questions. I suggest you add a bit more
meaningful detail to the report.
Thanks,
Justin
If SIGNA started as a university project, which is likely, I think the
university should sign SGA.
I'm a mentor of Nemo (donated from a university project). I helped the Nemo
community file SGA.
Best,
Gon
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alan Gates wrote:
> If I understand correctly, anytime
If I understand correctly, anytime software is brought into Apache as part
of the incubating process there must be documentation from the previous
owner of that software stating that they are donating it to Apache.
Without that Apache's ownership of the code is not clear. Justin, Dave,
others,
Hi,
> All looks good to me, and I checked a lot :-)
Well, tone clearer, except the software grant issue that is.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi,
All looks good to me, and I checked a lot :-)
It’s nice to see a project who brand is well respected as an Apache project,
that has grown it community and understands how to make releases.
A couple of questions:
- Can you give me an idea of the diversity (company wise) of the proposed
Hi,
> The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no need
> for SGA.
The link referred to doesn't give a reason why one is not required. Why was it
decided that it wasn’t needed? Even if it not required (which I’m not 100% sure
that is the case), would it be difficult to
The PPMC reached a conclusion on the discussion [1] that there is no need
for SGA.
Please let me know if there is anything else required. Otherwise, we start
the vote.
Thank you,
Moaz
[1]
Hi -
I see the discussion that an SGA is not needed about 4/2/2015. [1]
I don’t necessarily see the there was a conclusion to that discussion on
private@singa. I certainly don’t see anything related to Singapore in the
grants index in the foundation records. There are plenty of other sgas
Yes, I saw that, but I can't find those papers. They should have been
filed by the Apache secretary on the page I referenced. Either they were
properly transferred and we need to find them so that they are properly
posted in case anyone ever needs them, or, if they weren't sent, then we
need to
ในวันที่ ส. 31 ส.ค. 2019 17:48 Moaz Reyad เขียนว่า:
> Dear Alan,
>
> The copyright section in the project page [1] has the following item :
>
> Date: 2015-03-31
> Item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
> been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights
Dear Alan,
The copyright section in the project page [1] has the following item :
Date: 2015-03-31
Item: Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the
core code, and any new code produced by the
Sorry, I brought this up earlier on the dev list but didn't follow up. I
can't find a copy of the code grant for the code that Singa brought into
the Incubator. When I look at the Secretary's page[1] that lists all of
the code grants I don't see one for Singa. Per the initial proposal[2]
there
Hi all,
In the four and a half years that Apache SINGA (incubating) has
been a part of the Apache incubator, the community has grown, diversified,
and adapted to the Apache Way. We believe that the project is ready to
graduate to a TLP.
As a community, we have discussed [1] and voted [2] to
21 matches
Mail list logo
