Hi,
> I updated it to mention the SGA - not sure when the refresh will happen.
Thanks for that.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.a
I updated it to mention the SGA - not sure when the refresh will happen.
regards,
Karl
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:28 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> > given that we have an SGA from IBM now I'll assume that your concerns
> > are addressed - please let me know if that is not the case.
>
> I
HI,
> given that we have an SGA from IBM now I'll assume that your concerns
> are addressed - please let me know if that is not the case.
I don’t see these details recorded here [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-atomos.html
---
After clearing up some questions and getting an SGA from IBM to make
sure, the IP Clearance of the "Atomos Codebase" contribution passes.
We will proceed to incorporate the code in Felix.
regards,
Karl
--
Karl Pauls
karlpa...@gmail.com
-
Hi Justin,
given that we have an SGA from IBM now I'll assume that your concerns
are addressed - please let me know if that is not the case.
regards,
Karl
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:42 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> -1 until the following is cleared up.
>
> I can see that until a month ag
+1 from me
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:00 PM Karl Pauls wrote:
> > > I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code was
> relicensed,
> > > removing IBM specific headers. If the code never had IBM licensing on
> it,
> > > this would be a very easy +1 but because of the relicensing, it'
> > I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code was relicensed,
> > removing IBM specific headers. If the code never had IBM licensing on it,
> > this would be a very easy +1 but because of the relicensing, it's a -1 from
> > me until we get an SGA from IBM.
>
> I'll talk with Tom ab
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:04 PM John D. Ament wrote:
>
> CCLAs simply tell us that a company is aware that their employees are
> contributing to ASF projects. They don't really help much in the way of
> getting code transitioned here.
>
> I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code
CCLAs simply tell us that a company is aware that their employees are
contributing to ASF projects. They don't really help much in the way of
getting code transitioned here.
I think the problem at the root is the fact that the code was relicensed,
removing IBM specific headers. If the code never
Let me try to rephrase that:
The project has been done by Thomas Watson who has an iCLA, works for
IBM, and is a Felix PMC. I was assuming that would be enough to have
him be able to contribute this code. If we think we want something
more like a specific SGA or CCLA from IBM than I can try to wor
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Thomas Watson is from IBM and should be covered by their CCLA and has
> > an iCLA on file.
>
> Nope a CCLA is not a blanket permission to donate this code if it is
> copyright IBM.
I think we've been here before - so what would
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:09 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm not sure how that follows - which code is EPL?
>
> Several pieces of code in the repo still have headers that claim IBM is the
> copyright holder and under EPL license.
I can't see any code - there are only some profiles tha
Hi,
> I'm not sure how that follows - which code is EPL?
Several pieces of code in the repo still have headers that claim IBM is the
copyright holder and under EPL license.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
Hi,
> Thomas Watson is from IBM and should be covered by their CCLA and has
> an iCLA on file.
Nope a CCLA is not a blanket permission to donate this code if it is copyright
IBM.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:49 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> BTW if the code in general is not from IBM then it contains code that is and
> is licensed EPL, that can’t be included in an ASF source release so I would
> be -1 on those grounds.
I'm not sure how that follows - which code is EPL
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:42 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> -1 until the following is cleared up.
>
> I can see that until a month ago it was under the EPL license. Did all of the
> contributors agree to the license change?
The main contributor is Thomas Watson (who did the change) - there
Hi,
BTW if the code in general is not from IBM then it contains code that is and is
licensed EPL, that can’t be included in an ASF source release so I would be -1
on those grounds.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gener
Hi,
-1 until the following is cleared up.
I can see that until a month ago it was under the EPL license. Did all of the
contributors agree to the license change?
It also seems that the code was copyright is IBM. Have they given permission
for this software to be donated or license headers to
The Apache Felix project has received an "Atomos" contribution from
Thomas Watson.
Atomos is a Java module framework using OSGi Connect which is a
proposal (RFC) for the upcoming OSGI R8 Core specification.
- A snapshot of the code, that is already ALv2, is available in a
github repo: [0]
- The I
19 matches
Mail list logo
