In the past, SVN repos have just been made read-only.
(The intention was to move them to
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/RETIRED/ but that never
happened)
I think it would be a mistake to drop the repos.
There's no guarantee that the code is available anywhere else, and it
seems wrong to
Just a note from infra that we'll need a decision from the IPMC on this
matter no later than February 7th, preferably before :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 1/13/19 10:14 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hello IPMC and other folks,
We have a big bunch of retired podlings with git repositories on
Hi Daniel
Yes I'll be using Kibble so a great suggestion! Sounds like a win-win situation
to me :-)
Thanks
Sharan
On 2019/01/14 11:14:26, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 1/14/19 12:12 PM, Sharan F wrote:
> > Hi Greg
> >
> > You have a good point and my need is a more of a personal one (rather
> >
On 1/14/19 12:12 PM, Sharan F wrote:
Hi Greg
You have a good point and my need is a more of a personal one (rather
than an IPMC one) so if delete is the consensus, then go for it. I
won't hold it up.
If you are doing research on them, and you are (presumably) using Kibble
there, you could
Hi Greg
You have a good point and my need is a more of a personal one (rather than
an IPMC one) so if delete is the consensus, then go for it. I won't hold
it up.
Thanks
Sharan
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, 11:25 Greg Stein If they didn't graduate, then they aren't Apache projects. So as Myrle
>
If they didn't graduate, then they aren't Apache projects. So as Myrle
says, "what are they doing on our servers?" For the retired podlings, our
copy of their code could be misleading, relative to where it came from, or
where the community may have newly forked it.
Not an Infra opinion,
-g
On
Hi
I am doing some research on incubator projects and the ones that didn't
make it to TLP could be interesting to analyse so I'd be in favour of the
rename rather than a delete for now.
Thanks
Sharan
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, 07:12 Myrle Krantz If we can’t name a reason for keeping the data,
If we can’t name a reason for keeping the data, I’d be inclined to just
delete. We are not data squirrels.
: o),
Myrle
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:15 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hello IPMC and other folks,
>
> We have a big bunch of retired podlings with git repositories on
> git-wip-us. As we
Hello IPMC and other folks,
We have a big bunch of retired podlings with git repositories on
git-wip-us. As we are working on retiring this service, we need to
address what happens with these old project repositories.
The retired podlings we need to address are:
blur, cmda, concerted,
