A big thanks to all that have left feedback! After much deliberation, we
have decided to withdraw this proposal for the time being. The questions
around licenses are delicate, and we are currently not ready to navigate
them.
Cheers,
Kevin
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:52 PM 申远 wrote:
> You could
You could also read the documentation[1] here about what license is allowed
in ASF project.
[1] https://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
Best Regards,
YorkShen
申远
申远 于2019年10月22日周二 下午2:49写道：
> Base on my experience (wearing my Apache Weex's hat), GPL/LGPL dependency
> is not
Base on my experience (wearing my Apache Weex's hat), GPL/LGPL dependency
is not compatible with ASF's policy, and you may want to fix the License
problem at the beginning, even before into Incubator. Otherwise, GPL/LGPL
dependency will give you a lot of pain than you'd ever expect.
Best
Regarding licenses, dplyr is under MIT, see:
https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr/blob/master/LICENSE.md. However, other
packages are under GPL2.
Here are all the packages that sparklyr currently depends on and their
associated license (This was retrieved from
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=,
This looks interesting to me.
I would be willing to contribute, if you would like to add me to the
initial list of committers.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:50 AM Matt Sicker wrote:
> A lot of core R libraries seem to be under GPL. If we build more R
> projects at Apache, it seems like we may
A lot of core R libraries seem to be under GPL. If we build more R
projects at Apache, it seems like we may need more Apache-licensed (or
compatible) libraries in R.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 03:12, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I also concerned that the initial committer list only contains 3
Hi,
I also concerned that the initial committer list only contains 3 committers.
Why have you not included others in the community that have made contributions?
I don’t know if this is an issue or not but bring it up just in case you not
aware. I can see that some of the tidyverse packages are
Hi,
it's an interesting proposal.
I guess that one of your challenge during the incubation is to extend
the community (only 3 initial committers is very low) and extend the
diversity (two companies affiliation).
Regards
JB
On 19/10/2019 17:53, Kevin Kuo wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> We are
Hi -
An interesting proposal. I am concerned about the very small size of the
Initial Committer list with 3 individuals one of whom I only see small
contributions from on https://github.com/rstudio/sparklyr/graphs/contributors
Do the Mentors intend to be active participants in the community?
Greetings!
We are proposing to enter sparklyr (https://spark.rstudio.com/), an open
source R package for interfacing with Apache Spark, into incubation. Please
see the proposal below.
==
= Abstract =
sparklyr is an open source R package providing an interface to Apache
Spark, a system for
10 matches
Mail list logo
