Folks,
Thanks for all the support shown to the Qpid community and I am closing the
vote officially.
We got the following votes from the incubator PMC.
Voted +1
--
Kevan Miller
Yoav Shapira
Paul Freemantle
Matthieu Riou
Matt Hogstrom
-1 Votes
--
Initially Kevan voted -1, bu
Thank you all for the support shown.
I will be closing the vote at 12.00 EST.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 30, 2007 9:49 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>
> > Thanks for reminding. I almost forgot :(
> > They were done monday mornin
On Nov 29, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Thanks for reminding. I almost forgot :(
They were done monday morning and sent to me, but I forgot to upload
them.
Thanks again.
For the record +1
--kevan
-
To unsubs
Thanks for reminding. I almost forgot :(
They were done monday morning and sent to me, but I forgot to upload them.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 28, 2007 4:16 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rajith,Did you update the Dotnet binaries?
>
> --kevan
>
> On Nov 26, 2007 8:08
Hi Rajith,Did you update the Dotnet binaries?
--kevan
On Nov 26, 2007 8:08 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you all for the support shown.
> However Cliff Schmidt pointed out a few issues with the current release
> candidates.
> 1.) The disclaimer was missing from all RC's
Thank you all for the support shown.
However Cliff Schmidt pointed out a few issues with the current release
candidates.
1.) The disclaimer was missing from all RC's except java
2.) The LICENSE file didn't contain the AMQP license for the specs.
3.) The dotnet release didn't have a source distribut
+1 on the Nov 20th binaries.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
On Nov 23, 2007 1:24 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can I close this vote on monday evening at 6.00 EST?
> The vote has been open from Tuesday evening (after fixing all licensing
> issues).
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 10:50 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EM
Hey,
> > > > This is a kind reminder that the vote will end (after 72 hours) on
> > > Friday
> > > > night.
> > > > Please be kind enough to review and vote for the release.
Sorry for the late vote, Thanksgiving and all. +1 from me (again) ;)
Yoav
-
On 23/11/2007, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can I close this vote on monday evening at 6.00 EST?
> The vote has been open from Tuesday evening (after fixing all licensing
> issues).
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 10:50 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi All,
Can I close this vote on monday evening at 6.00 EST?
The vote has been open from Tuesday evening (after fixing all licensing
issues).
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 21, 2007 10:50 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is my renewed vote +1.
>
> Paul
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 3:48 PM,
This is my renewed vote +1.
Paul
On Nov 21, 2007 3:48 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a kind reminder that the vote will end (after 72 hours) on Friday
> night.
> Please be kind enough to review and vote for the release.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> On Nov 20, 2007 6:54
This is a kind reminder that the vote will end (after 72 hours) on Friday
night.
Please be kind enough to review and vote for the release.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 20, 2007 6:54 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We
Thanks Kevan.
Appreciate your help in reviewing and helping us through the licensing
issues.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 20, 2007 6:54 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We have resolved the licensing issues and update
On Nov 20, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi All,
We have resolved the licensing issues and updated the NOTICE and
LICENSE files.
The the new release candidates are available at the same location.
The keys and svn tag can be accessed using the same URL's as well.
Hi Rajith,
The
Oops. Accidentally sent this to Rajith directly, rather than to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: November 19, 2007 5:15:50 PM EST
To: Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ANN] Qpid M2 Release
Hi All,
We have resolved the licensing issues and updated the NOTICE and LICENSE
files.
The the new release candidates are available at the same location.
The keys and svn tag can be accessed using the same URL's as well.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 16, 2007 1:42 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Kevan,
We rebuild the java RC after cleaning up the dependencies.
Since there are no code changes (except for one file which removed
references to commons logging) and only POM changes, we decided to restart
the vote on incubator list. We have also communicated the message to the
qpid list.
He
On 14/11/2007, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have reduced our dependency set to the following, I will update the
> NOTICE file accordingly and commit the changes so Rajith can rebuild
> the Java release.
>
Sorry let me try that again, I don't think there is anything
suspicious in th
I have reduced our dependency set to the following, I will update the
NOTICE file accordingly and commit the changes so Rajith can rebuild
the Java release.
[dependency:tree]
org.apache.qpid:qpid-client-java14:jar:1.0-incubating-M2
log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.12:compile
org.slf4j:slf4j-simple:jar:1.
On 14/11/2007, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rajith,
> Where is the license information for artifacts included in your
> binaries?
> Your notice files refer to non-apache licenses for a number of your
> artifacts. I would expect to see these licenses included in your
> distribution.
Yes, we have no use of the servlet API.
For JMS we only use the geronimo spec files.
As Martin pointed out, maven seems to be pulling all these jars into the build.
Let us investigate and get back to you guys.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 14, 2007 11:00 AM, Martin Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 14/11/2007, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmm looking at the notice file, it looks like the NOTICE file was
> generated from remote-resources, but it looks completely out of date.
> There are several jars in the lib that have no mention in the NOTICE
> file.
>
> To name a few:
>
Hmm looking at the notice file, it looks like the NOTICE file was
generated from remote-resources, but it looks completely out of date.
There are several jars in the lib that have no mention in the NOTICE
file.
To name a few:
log4j, com.ibm.icu, jms spec
That's strange. Was the NOTICE
Hi Rajith,
Where is the license information for artifacts included in your
binaries?
Your notice files refer to non-apache licenses for a number of your
artifacts. I would expect to see these licenses included in your
distribution. You don't give any license info for a few jars (e.g. msv
a
Hi Kevan,
Thanks a lot. Since we started the vote on monday noon, we can
hopefully close the vote (barring any -1s) by thursday noon.
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 13, 2007 6:38 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2007 6:17 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ca
On Nov 13, 2007 6:17 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can the IPMC members cast their vote, as we are very keen to do the
> release during Apache Con.
> We already have 3 mentor votes. Is that good enough?
Hi Rajith,
Well, here's my interpretation...
According to
http://incuba
Can the IPMC members cast their vote, as we are very keen to do the
release during Apache Con.
We already have 3 mentor votes. Is that good enough?
Regards,
Rajith
On Nov 12, 2007 12:33 PM, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Qpid PPMC is happy to notify the completion o
Folks,
The Qpid PPMC is happy to notify the completion of the vote for the Qpid M2
release.
We would appreciate if the incubator PMC could ratify the release.
There were 12 binding votes in total, including 3 mentor votes.
The following is the vote thread.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox
29 matches
Mail list logo
