The CXF build fails several tests.
Environment:
Maven version: 2.0.8
Java version: 1.5.0_13
OS name: "windows xp" version: "5.1" arch: "x86" Family: "windows"
Log file:
http://people.apache.org/~sebb/CXF
On 30/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are several problems with the NOTIC
There are several problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
The NOTICE file should only pertain to artefacts actually included in
distribution; it should not have any details of transitive
dependencies. So the "/uses" text should be removed.
The line
This product includes/uses software(s) deve
The policy page says:
"Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least three
+1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page), and only the
PPMC member votes are binding. If the majority of all v
As long as the vote was for the *same artifact*, I don't see what
difference it makes *where* the vote was posted.
Craig
On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:
I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they
vote in
this thread, no mater though as there are enoug
This vote has been open for 4 days now. We have binding +1 votes from:
Bill Stoddard
Ant Elder
Niclas Hedhman
Davanum Srinivas
Jim Jagielski *
Jeff Genender *
Bruce Snyder *
(*) votes were on the cxf-dev vote
That's 7 binding +1 votes along with the 10 non-binding votes on cxf-dev.
Thus, th
+1
Bill
Daniel Kulp wrote:
We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered during some
interop testing.
For a full list of the issues, see:
h
I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they vote in
this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
...ant
On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Just a quick update while the vote is open.
>
> Jim Jagielski and Jeff G
Looks ok to me, +1.
...ant
On Jan 25, 2008 9:42 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
> is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
> 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encou
On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:42, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
> is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
> 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered during some
> interop testing.
+1
Chee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 from me!
- -- dims
Daniel Kulp wrote:
|
| Just a quick update while the vote is open.
|
| Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-dev.
| Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes. Vote is still
| open
Just a quick update while the vote is open.
Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-dev.
Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes. Vote is still
open :-)
Dan
On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release
We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered during some
interop testing.
For a full list of the issues, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jir
12 matches
Mail list logo
