On 20/01/12 06:46, Eric Yang wrote:
Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Mentor could lose interests in a project over time due to various kind of
reasons. Perhaps, It is time to deconstruct mentor idea and promote ppmc to
ipmc after making incubating release(s) and only allow incubator project to
graduate after promoted ppmc has mentored another project to make inc
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:57:08AM -0500, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release.
>
> Situations like this seem to be common.
>
>> My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether t
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:57:08AM -0500, Ralph Goers wrote:
> This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the release.
Situations like this seem to be common.
> My worry isn't about the PPMC or committers but about whether this podling
> has sufficient mentors.
Perhaps the podling has a
On 1/26/2012 5:57 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on
> the release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two
> didn't participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect
> and needed to be co
One of the mentors recently resigned: http://s.apache.org/2Ss
Chukwa has been coming out of a long, quasi-dormancy due to a
complicated set of upstream dependencies that weren't releasing the
features it required. It's discussed in the December report:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2011
Now you have me worried. This podling has 4 mentors listed. Only 1 voted on the
release. You indicated you were too busy to look at it and the other two didn't
participate at all. Although the tally below is obviously incorrect and needed
to be corrected, your response leads me to believe you we
My apology to all. I am sorry to send out the draft copy when I
intented to save as draft to count the actual votes.
Result Summary for voting Chukwa 0.5.0 RC 3
+1 [9]
0 [0]
-1 [0]
IPMC:
+1 Chris Douglas
+1 Ralph Goers
+1 Ant Elder
PPMC:
+1 Bill Graham
+1 Jerome Boulon
+1 Ari Rabkin
+1 Eric
On 1/25/2012 11:49 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
> The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
> to review the release.
>
> Result Summary for this List:
>
> +1 [1]
> 0[1]
> -1[0]
>
> With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
> from genera
The voting period is now closed. Thanks to everyone who took the time
to review the release.
Result Summary for this List:
+1 [1]
0[1]
-1[0]
With the one IPMC member vote from mentors on the dev list and two +1
from general@incubator, the vote succeeds.
IPMC member voting record:
Ch
Did you every get another vote?
Ralph
On Jan 19, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
> Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> On 1/15/2012 1:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> You know, you hav
+1
Same comment on the NOTICE file as over here:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/hlfebouyg3r5w27i
...ant
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
> Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
regards,
Eric
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 1/15/2012 1:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> You know, you have 4 mentors all of whom are supposed to be IPMC members.
>> Have they voted?
>
> Nope, traveling, and n
On 1/15/2012 1:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> You know, you have 4 mentors all of whom are supposed to be IPMC members.
> Have they voted?
Nope, traveling, and now back in project hell at one of my own
homes. I did review the Chukwa monthly report and comment on
several apparent issues on dev@. I
+1 (binding)
Everything looks fine and the build worked for me. However, I do find it odd
that the online documentation references a binary distribution yet none is
present on the web site below.
On Jan 14, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
> This is a reminder to vote Chukwa 0.5.0 rele
You know, you have 4 mentors all of whom are supposed to be IPMC members. Have
they voted?
Ralph
On Jan 14, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Eric Yang wrote:
> This is a reminder to vote Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 3. We are
> still missing 2 IPMC votes to close this vote. If someone could ta
This is a reminder to vote Chukwa 0.5.0 release candidate 3. We are
still missing 2 IPMC votes to close this vote. If someone could take
a look, it would be greatly appreciated.
regards,
Eric
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Checksum and
+1 (binding)
Checksum and signature match, verifications from previous RCs hold b/c
only NOTICE and LICENSE have changed. -C
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Eric Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source t
+1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:07 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
>> release for Chukwa.
>>
>> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukw
On 10 January 2012 06:09, Eric Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
> release for Chukwa.
>
> The source tarball artifact is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
>
> Documents are available at:
>
> http://peop
Hi all,
Chukwa 0.5.0 is ready for release. This will be the first incubator
release for Chukwa.
The source tarball artifact is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc3/
Documents are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/
The SVN tag to be vote
21 matches
Mail list logo