[RESULT][VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-31 Thread Simon Laws
On Jan 31, 2008 2:30 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > ...ant > > > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-31 Thread Simon Laws
On Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > ...ant > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified > some > > issues. > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/general

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-31 Thread ant elder
+1 ...ant On Jan 28, 2008 5:31 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some > issues. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html > > A new release candidate (RC3a) has been create

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-30 Thread Kevan Miller
+1 I scanned the RAT output, eyeballed the license and notice files, and cracked open some of the binaries. All looked good. Nice job. --kevan On Jan 28, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Simon Laws wrote: Hi, The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some issues. http://w

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-29 Thread Matthieu Riou
Looks good to me, thanks for correcting the problems mentioned by Sebastian. +1 Matthieu On Jan 28, 2008 9:31 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some > issues. > > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubato

[VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release (RC3a)

2008-01-28 Thread Simon Laws
Hi, The previous VOTE thread here for SCA Java 1.1-incubating identified some issues. http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg16483.html A new release candidate (RC3a) has been created addressing the issues as discussed in the previous thread. I'm starting this IPMC VOTE thr

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-27 Thread Simon Laws
On Jan 25, 2008 12:50 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-25 Thread sebb
On 25/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > Hi sebb > > > > > > > > Thank you for the detai

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-25 Thread Simon Laws
On Jan 25, 2008 8:59 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Hi sebb > > > > > > Thank you for the detailed review. > > > > > > Can you tell me what you mean by > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-25 Thread ant elder
On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi sebb > > > > Thank you for the detailed review. > > > > Can you tell me what you mean by > > > > On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 24/01/2008,

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi sebb > > Thank you for the detailed review. > > Can you tell me what you mean by > > On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think the NOTICE files in the art

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread Simon Laws
Hi sebb Thank you for the detailed review. Can you tell me what you mean by On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being > > distributed are OK. > > Surely the

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being > distributed are OK. Surely the archive bundles are also distributed? == There are some discrepancies in the jar files covered by the LICENSE file - the names mentioned in the

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-24 Thread ant elder
I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being distributed are OK. The ${pom.name} is changed by the build process so the generated artifact has the proper name, for example, the jar built for wsdl2java ends up with a NOTICE file containing "Apache Tuscany SCA WSDL2Java Tool", se

Re: [VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-23 Thread sebb
Some of the NOTICE files start with the text: ${pom.name} e.g. tools/wsdl2java and modules/policy This does not seem right. The top-level NOTICE and LICENSE files in demos/mortgage-loanapproval are the standard ASF ones - however NOTICE and LICENSE.txt in the demos/mortgage-loanapproval/src/ma

[VOTE] Please approve Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release

2008-01-23 Thread Simon Laws
Hi, The Tuscany project had a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish the Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release. The vote thread on tuscany-dev has 7 +1s and an archive can be found at: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27321.html The release includes new function and bug