Re: Inclusion/exclusion of ASF headers from GNU Autotools output (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1))

Going with Mike here. Get Outlook for Android On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM -0400, "Mike Jumper" wrote: On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: >> >> So OK, I'm going to

Inclusion/exclusion of ASF headers from GNU Autotools output (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1))

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:03 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: >> >> So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable >> stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating. > > We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

In which case +1 from me as well. LieGrue, strub > Am 31.03.2017 um 19:27 schrieb Mike Jumper : > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Mike Jumper wrote: >> >>> * guacamole-auth-header includes some copies of ALv2 and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Mike Jumper wrote: > >> * guacamole-auth-header includes some copies of ALv2 and mentions in your >>> > LICENSE file. You only need to propagate the copyright notice here, >>> not the >>> > license text (since you already

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Mike Jumper wrote: * guacamole-auth-header includes some copies of ALv2 and mentions in your > LICENSE file. You only need to propagate the copyright notice here, not the > license text (since you already have that once). Looks like this might be > the case around the binary tarballs. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * Could build the client, but I don't have a setup to build the server > * DISCLAIMER in every artifact > * Sufficient LICENSE & NOTICE files. Even in the WAR! Good job :) > * Commits exist in SCM > *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

+1 (binding) * Could build the client, but I don't have a setup to build the server * DISCLAIMER in every artifact * Sufficient LICENSE & NOTICE files. Even in the WAR! Good job :) * Commits exist in SCM * Sigs/xsums OK In the future: * Your copyright in NOTICE files needs updating (2017) *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating. > > We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Mike Jumper wrote: > The link is sent out only to the dev@ list. Mike, I agree with all of your arguments and it seems to me that you grok the spirit of the policy. A while back, you and I worked through many of the same themes with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 11:10 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:14 PM Mike Jumper > wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:03 AM Mike

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:14 PM Mike Jumper wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:03 AM Mike Jumper > > wrote: > > > ... > > > Thanks, John. We definitely

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:03 AM Mike Jumper > wrote: > > ... > > Thanks, John. We definitely won't move forward with altering the presence > > of the ASF headers until we get a ruling from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:03 AM Mike Jumper wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable > > stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:01 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable > stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a follow > up JIRA (run it by legal first, as I'm honestly curious). I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

So OK, I'm going to vote +1 on the release. There's some questionable stuff about the autogenerated files, and I think we can handle as a follow up JIRA (run it by legal first, as I'm honestly curious). I suspect the ruling would be that the ASF header is OK to leave there since the tooling

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Mike Jumper wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > > Does the license of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Does the license of autotools need to be included in LICENSE? > > > > Good question. Other projects that use it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:55 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Does the license of autotools need to be included in LICENSE? > > Good question. Other projects that use it don't add to license INAL but > given the exclusion states you’re allowed to distribute under

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Hi, > Does the license of autotools need to be included in LICENSE? Good question. Other projects that use it don't add to license INAL but given the exclusion states you’re allowed to distribute under your own terms [2] I think that’s OK. > I do see reference to autotools being approved for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > So I'll be up front - I have mixed feelings about the download page. I > love the format, it works well. I dislike that you're linking to > unapproved releases, but it does have a decent warning sign. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Hi, So I'll be up front - I have mixed feelings about the download page. I love the format, it works well. I dislike that you're linking to unapproved releases, but it does have a decent warning sign. Some items I'm noticing: - The included dockerfile should reference the guacamole community

[VOTE] Release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating (RC1)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Guacamole community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Guacamole 0.9.12-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here: