Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hi, > Or is your feeling that inclusion of the LICENSE is enough of a prominent > statement? In this case yes I can't see any reason to include it in NOTICE and LICENSE inclusion would be enough. But I'd be interested in what other IPMC people think. Either way it’s not a big issue, at worst

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:27 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > The reason is that the license is a Cat B. Otherwise, I would advise to > > include it in your notices file as well. NiFi does this well IMHO > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hi, > The reason is that the license is a Cat B. Otherwise, I would advise to > include it in your notices file as well. NiFi does this well IMHO >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Perfect, thanks Dan. I'll point out that after looking at the PR I do see one more issue. For the font files, can you point to a public location for them? google tends to provide a free service hosting a number of fonts. The reason is that the license is a Cat B. Otherwise, I would advise to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On 2/15/17, 4:37 PM, "John D. Ament" wrote: >Dan, > >So here's my point of view. Justin's provided some more context on how to >shape licenses. If you feel very strongly that the release should go out >the door, the way it is, then I am OK with changing my vote to a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:10 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:05 PM Marvin Humphrey > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:05 PM Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > Personally, the reason why I'm asking about the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hi, > Thanks, John.. I'm confused on this. According to > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps : > > `In LICENSE, add a pointer to the dependency's license within the > distribution and a short note summarizing its licensing:` The pointer mentioned there is a file

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:05 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > > You're right -- fixing the license file is not a huge effort (now that > > we understand what's expected..). The effort is in going

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > You're right -- fixing the license file is not a huge effort (now that > we understand what's expected..). The effort is in going thru the > voting process again.. > > I'll go with whatever you recommend.. Folks, we're

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

You're right -- fixing the license file is not a huge effort (now that we understand what's expected..). The effort is in going thru the voting process again.. I'll go with whatever you recommend.. thanks.. Dan On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:58 AM, John D. Ament wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

I'd like to know the effort required from your POV to fix the license file. Alex's description matches my expectations, thanks for clarifying it. I would rather not create a release that didn't match the licensing requirements, but will be OK if you come back saying its a huge effort (however, I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Thanks, Alex.. John -- would it be reasonable to fix this in the next release barring any other major issues? thanks.. Dan On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 2/15/17, 7:40 AM, "Dan Kirkwood" wrote: > >>Thanks, John.. I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On 2/15/17, 7:40 AM, "Dan Kirkwood" wrote: >Thanks, John.. I'm confused on this. According to >http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps : > >`In LICENSE, add a pointer to the dependency's license within the >distribution and a short note

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Thanks, John.. I'm confused on this. According to http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps : `In LICENSE, add a pointer to the dependency's license within the distribution and a short note summarizing its licensing:` Is MIT a special case in this regard? And in that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

-1 license file still needs a lot of work. MIT licenses need to be explicitly included in the license, not just linked. In general, the license contents need to be in the LICENSE file, not just links to the licenses. In some cases, its done like this (full license headers copied) and in others

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > The git tag for the repository is "RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9": > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/releases/tag/RELEASE-1.8.0-RC9 > > The source distribution (also linked in the release notes) is here: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

+1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:28 AM Dan Kirkwood wrote: > Minor correction to the previous email -- the artifacts for RC9 are > located here > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC9/ > . > > Please review this RC and vote.. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Minor correction to the previous email -- the artifacts for RC9 are located here https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC9/. Please review this RC and vote.. The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Traffic

[VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)

Hello Incubator PMC, The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating. We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. The VOTE RESULT is here: