[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-19 Thread Adrian Cole
Thanks to everyone that participated. The vote to release Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0 is now closed. It PASSED with 5 (+1 binding) votes and no 0 or -1 votes: +1 Willem Ning Jiang (binding) +1 Sheng Wu (binding) +1 Andriy Redko (binding) +1 Michael Semb Wever (binding) +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Here’s some other links that may help. A worked example on how to assemble LICENSE and NOTICE: https://github.com/justinmclean/ApacheWombat https://vimeo.com/171210141 A previous incubator talk (from 2017): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0-lp1t9ee0 A talk I gave last year it currently

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Paul King
I'd second Geertjan's comments about how helpful (even though it probably seemed painful at the time) Justin's comments were for Apache Groovy during our incubation. Perhaps it is worth re-reading some of the reasons why The ASF values highly the provenance behind all of the software in its

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > the fact people allow tools like apache RAT to rot, yet somehow can > find glitches in dozens of repos tells me priorities are whacked. If you’ve found an issue with Rat please raise an issue with that project. Rat isn’t expected to be perfect, as it says: Rat is really little more than a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > maybe you can open source the tools you use justin. I spoken about it at many ApacheCons and provided "them" here on this list. Calling them tools is probably an exaggeration, It’s nothing complex. Here’s the tool I used: search copyright | sort -u (Where search is "find . -type f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Probably more than anyone in the world, I feel your pain. Tip: document everything Justin identifies as a problem, focus on those items in addition to everything you’re focusing on already, and each release will be less painful than the one before. Gj On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 17:46, Adrian Cole

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Adrian Cole
the fact people allow tools like apache RAT to rot, yet somehow can find glitches in dozens of repos tells me priorities are whacked. For example, the last release justin found a second header on a file that said it was temporary (now deleted) did he manually look at hundreds of files to see

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
In defence of Justin :-) I'm very sure NetBeans would not be as solid and well placed in Apache right now, outside the Incubator, without Justin's uncanny ability to find glitches. :-) Gj On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 4:59 PM Adrian Cole wrote: > maybe you can open source the tools you use justin. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Adrian Cole
maybe you can open source the tools you use justin. you seem uncanny ability to find glitches, yet also have an ability to ignore note in the vote request mentioning known issues. start helping instead of finding faults. you are the reason incubator is not something anyone wants to go through

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > But for Zipkin, there are lots of community releases which are built > on top of auto tools, so I think it's much safer for us to start a > parallel vote both PPMC and IPMC. Given all release I’ve looked at had license (or other) issues why do you think that the “auto tools” are doing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-18 Thread Willem Jiang
As mentor is member of PPMC and IPMC, it could speed up the voting process by getting the mentor involved at the earlier stage. Normally we just wait for the PPMC to do the technical check then we go through the License check in the IPMC vote. But for Zipkin, there are lots of community releases

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-17 Thread Michael Semb Wever
> Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason +1 - built source - checked sha - checked copyright and licence (noting Justin's points) - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > This vote is running concurrent with the above, carrying over 3 > binding +1 votes from mentors Willem Ning Jiang, Sheng Wu and Andriy > Redko. Given that people can change their vote I would suggest you not do this in future but wait until the podling vote is over. If an issue was found

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) but there some improvements that can be made. I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE needs a little more work and is missing LICENSE for [2]. - NOTICE is incorrect as it missing information from this NOTICE [4] - no unexpected binary files -

[VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0

2019-05-16 Thread Adrian Cole
Hello IPMC The Apache Zipkin community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Zipkin (incubating) version 2.14.0. The voting thread can be found here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/03b215cc4a6e10a7092fe39b6ce87d3a964f35b6e181e12da4d45432@%3Cdev.zipkin.apache.org%3E This