The vote passes: The results of the VOTE was:
+1 : 5
0: 0
-1:0
+1 (binding)
Justin Mclean
Drew Farris
John D. Ament
P. Taylor Goetz
Josh Elser
Vote Thread:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Gossip-version-gossip-0-1-1-incubating-RC2-td53327.html
Thank you everyon
Hello,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- name includes incubating
- disclaimer exists
- notice looks good (echo Justin's comment re: 2106 vs 2017)
- commit 6720f35beb8 is present at git://git.apache.org/incubator-gossip.git
- binary distribution builds
- gpg signatures OK (echo Justin's comment re: signi
Hi,
> However, none of our incubator policies talk about this as far as I can
> tell. Is this something we actually want to pursue?
Also see [1].
> Most TLPs don't do this.
Not sure re exact numbers, but there a number that do, or at least they
document it that way :-)
Thanks,
Justin
1. htt
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> IMO, it prevents a one-line release command for Maven projects using the
> standard conventions (I'm blindly assuming is Maven is the most common tool
> used). However, I can also see where Justin is coming from with the
> provenance side of thi
IMO, it prevents a one-line release command for Maven projects using the
standard conventions (I'm blindly assuming is Maven is the most common
tool used). However, I can also see where Justin is coming from with the
provenance side of things (the disconnect between what was voted on and
what g
So this issue pops up in a lot of podling votes.
Next time could you please:
- Place the artefacts for voting on in [1] that way they can be released
with an svn mv command.
However, none of our incubator policies talk about this as far as I can
tell. Is this something we actually want to pursue
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- name includes incubating
- disclaimer exists
- notice good (but year last year - please update in next release)
- all source files have ASF header
- no binary files in release
- can compile from source
Next time could you please:
- Place the artefacts for voting on in
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:19 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> +1
>
> Few notes:
>
> - Add license to README.md (you have it on .travis.yml so why not?)
> - The use of RELEASE creates a potentially not-repeatable build for apache
> parent.
> - More than the listed test failed:
>
> Failed tests:
> Shut
+1
Few notes:
- Add license to README.md (you have it on .travis.yml so why not?)
- The use of RELEASE creates a potentially not-repeatable build for apache
parent.
- More than the listed test failed:
Failed tests:
ShutdownDeadtimeTest.DeadNodesDoNotComeAliveAgain:103 ComparisonFailure
expecte
Forwarding my vote from Devi list. +1 (binding)
-Taylor
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 3:06 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
> Forwarding my +1 (binding)
>
> Edward Capriolo wrote:
>> I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.1-incubating.
>>
>> The PPMC vote thread is here:
>> The vote thread is here:
Forwarding my +1 (binding)
Edward Capriolo wrote:
I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.1-incubating.
The PPMC vote thread is here:
The vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/86bf41b491a575c4751c1191f8f9d8ee2d17bedeac4bdef582ba5f03@%3Cdev.gossip.apache.org%3E
Rele
I am pleased to call an IPMC vote for gossip-0.1.1-incubating.
The PPMC vote thread is here:
The vote thread is here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/86bf41b491a575c4751c1191f8f9d8ee2d17bedeac4bdef582ba5f03@%3Cdev.gossip.apache.org%3E
Release this package?
[ ] +1 yes
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1
12 matches
Mail list logo
