On 1/6/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/4/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
> > > history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
> > > brings code over?
> >
> > It is still being deb
On 1/4/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
> > history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
> > brings code over?
>
> It is still being debated, so no. Roy's comments about import from private
> vs publ
On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy, what happens if I have a codebase, and I have one file in it that
imports or otherwise references third party GPL code, and I then
delete my
infected file? Do we have a concern about having that GPL infected
code in
SVN, even though it
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:21:28PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>...
> Roy, what happens if I have a codebase, and I have one file in it that
> imports or otherwise references third party GPL code, and I then delete my
> infected file? Do we have a concern about having that GPL infected code in
>
> Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
> history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
> brings code over?
It is still being debated, so no. Roy's comments about import from private
vs public repositories may be a reasonable approach. Personally, I'm a
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:40, Jules Gosnell wrote:
> Isn't the incubator meant to lower the bar for projects wishing to
> migrate into ASF ?
Not directly. Incubator is the buffer that is here to ensure that the ASF, its
members and to some degree its committers are given a low legal risk. Tha
Jules Gosnell wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
>>>
We should take history!
A snapshot does not solve any "legal or social issues". Obscuring history
does not change history and if code is a derivative of LGPL, then not having
the history does not change that fact.
If there is something in the real history, then it is best to have that
explicit i
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
brings code over?
I don't s
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
brings code over?
I don't see how the incubator can
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
brings code over?
I don't see how the incubator can
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling brings
code over?
I don't see how the incubator can hold a single position on t
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code history
is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling brings code over?
I don't see how the incubator can hold a single position on this one.
There are good r
On Dec 27, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
So what would it mean if Project Foo comes to the ASF, having
released their 1.0 beforehand under the GPL, and then I grab the
1.0 code from the ASF repo and release that as my own version of
the original 1.0?
Project Foo can only come to t
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 23, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Is it permissible to commit code to our repositories that were under, say,
GPL (for when a project, like SA, re-licenses)?
Yes. Relicensing means the copyright owners offer a different set
Hi gang,
I agree with Roy from a policy point of view. From a pragmatism point
of view I think the policy is "we SHOULD preserve history for existing
open source projects", but not a "MUST", because of the technical
difficulties (with SVN, no doubt solvable. With some other stuff (eg
bugzilla), le
-1 from me :)
If we have access to the history, then we should take advantage
of it. This is especially true when the code is from public
repos, or, at least, non-private donators.
On Dec 23, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me. Start with a snapshot.
On 12/23/05, Justin Eren
On Dec 23, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On December 23, 2005 1:33:34 PM -0800 "Roy T. Fielding"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree with Justin on these points. We must have a clean
break when
the code comes from a private source repository, since the history
may
conta
On Saturday 24 December 2005 06:26, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> However, I'm concerned with altering the perception that everything in our
> code repositories was done on our lists. Instead, we'll now be conveying
> all of the oddball things that happened externally - be it at codehaus,
> SourceFor
On 12/23/05, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > --On December 23, 2005 1:15:44 PM -0500 "Geir Magnusson Jr."
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry to change the subject...
> >>
> >> Can someone make a definitive statemen
--On December 23, 2005 1:33:34 PM -0800 "Roy T. Fielding"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree with Justin on these points. We must have a clean break when
the code comes from a private source repository, since the history may
contain information that has never been revealed to the public.
H
On Dec 23, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On December 23, 2005 1:15:44 PM -0500 "Geir Magnusson Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history
is brought into our repo from elsewhere whe
+1 from me. Start with a snapshot.
On 12/23/05, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On December 23, 2005 1:15:44 PM -0500 "Geir Magnusson Jr."
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry to change the subject...
> >
> > Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code hist
--On December 23, 2005 1:15:44 PM -0500 "Geir Magnusson Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code history
is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling brings code over?
I say no. We should only t
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code history
is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling brings code over?
I can't make a definitive statement but stdcxx didn't (although
I would have liked it to).
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling brings
code over?
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
26 matches
Mail list logo