On 08/08/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest example is all the debate surrounding whether or not the
glasgow name is appropriate. Up until about a week or two ago, it
certainly was accepted practice (just look around), and now 'suddenly'
there's messiness. Its ok if opinions
rant
It must be sooo frustrating for new projects coming in. They read the
websites, read the mail archives, talk to loads and loads of people,
and when they think they get it all right they send in a proposal. And
then, more often than not, someone somewhere within the ASF sees
something that is
ABSOLUTELY +1! I also feel really terrible about our unprofessionalism
when it comes to handling proposals.
+1 for another list for proposal submissions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
for this to remain for the current purpose.
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 23:24 -0700, Leo Simons wrote:
rant
It
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 01:17:25PM +0530, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
+1 for another list for proposal submissions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
for this to remain for the current purpose.
-1. Eww. Please not another list. Folks just need to exhibit common sense
towards proposals. -- justin
+42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per
single thread on this list at the moment).
Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with versioning policy. Podlings
should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and then
a more recent one on graduation (so even if
On 8/8/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we
could have a released version of all the things we want a project to
do and/or comply with (this is our website) and we could have an
in progress version of the same thing (this
A big +1. And I also really like the idea that the proposals contain
the version number they were written against.
-David
On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:34 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 8/8/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
+42 (which, I believe, is also the average number of messages per
single thread on this list at the moment).
Anyway, I'm definitely in agreement with versioning policy. Podlings
should comply to the latest agreed set at the time of entry, and
