Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-06-10 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > We tried very hard to only use min-headers in cases where they were > config/property/test/simple script type files (often used by tooling). Which according to [1] is not an appropriate use, you also have source files with the short header. I suggest you check with legal if this is OK. T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-06-10 Thread Matt Rutkowski
Hi Justin, Given the documented rationale of where we use the mini-header (https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/blob/master/docs/license_compliance.md#project-asf-License-header-policy) are there specific files (types) or specific files themselves where you believe they are not

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-06-10 Thread David P Grove
Justin Mclean wrote on 06/09/2019 09:50:12 AM: > > Sorry to be clearer re the short header issue I suggest you read > [1]. It may be used with mages, minified JavaScript or PDFs, that’s > not the case where it’s been used in your releases and this has been > pointed out several times. If there a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-06-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Sorry to be clearer re the short header issue I suggest you read [1]. It may be used with mages, minified JavaScript or PDFs, that’s not the case where it’s been used in your releases and this has been pointed out several times. If there are other cases where you have confirmed with legal-d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-06-09 Thread Rodric Rabbah
> > We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5] and we document our > use of the short licenses > > Which I see was some time ago but this keeps happening in your releases. > You are correct that we have an outstanding item to tighten our automated checks inline with the project's documen

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-06-09 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > For several of the issues you noted, I opened github defects [1-4] against > the relevant repos so that we will address them before the next release of > the corresponding artifacts. Thanks for that. > We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5] and we document our use > of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-06-09 Thread Rodric Rabbah
For several of the issues you noted, I opened github defects [1-4] against the relevant repos so that we will address them before the next release of the corresponding artifacts. We've also discussed the use of "short licenses" [5] and we document our use of the short licenses and license excl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-05-06 Thread Rodric Rabbah
Thank you Justin for the feedback. I opened several defects to address all the points you've raised. For reference: - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/87 - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/86 - https://github.com/apache/incubator-ope

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk Runtimes v1.13.0-incubating

2019-05-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked all releases: - incubating in artefact names - signatures and hashes fine - NOTICE and LICENSE fine in most cases (but see below) - Some files have incorrect headers (e.g [1]) or missing headers [2]. This has been brought up before in previous releases. - No unexpende